2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCecile Richards and Hillary Clinton joint interview: Why These2 Women Broke A 100-Year Tradion for u
Democrat for Obama Retweeted
Hillary Clinton @HillaryClinton 5h5 hours ago
Hillary sat down with @CecileRichards and @refinery29 to discuss whats at stake in the 2016 election. Hint: A lot.
http://hrc.io/1mYQKvt
http://www.refinery29.com/2016/01/101149/hillary-clinton-cecile-richards-planned-parenthood-funding-interview?utm_medium=social&utm_source=tw&utm_campaign=20160114#.4dzoxsp:RzjL
Photo: Matt Baron/BEI / Rex Features.
Why These Two Women Broke A 100-Year Tradition For You
Photo of Neha Gandhi
Jan 14, 2016 12:30 PM
Let's play a game of two truths and a lie.
1. Planned Parenthood was founded by a registered Republican who didn't support abortion.
2. Only 3% of Planned Parenthood's services are abortions. And those are not covered by government funding.
3. Planned Parenthood is the nation's largest provider of sex ed.
Those facts are actually all true. See here, here, and here.
But the national discourse around Planned Parenthood rarely centers on health care, preventative care, cancer screenings, or education. It's about abortion. It's about lawmakers taking away a woman's right to choose. And, while Refinery29 isn't a partisan organization, we are strong advocates of women's rights and autonomy in healthcare decisions so naturally, we jumped at the opportunity for an exclusive interview with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards.
And while protesters threaten and picket Planned Parenthood and too often, zealots and terrorists attack it Congress votes to defund it. In the past four years, 288 restrictive measures limiting access to abortions have been passed at the state level. In 2016, the Supreme Court will hear two potentially landscape-altering cases (Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. Burwell and Whole Woman's Health v. Cole) that could challenge access to contraceptives and uphold those state-level restrictions, respectively. And, every single Republican candidate in the current presidential race touts an anti-choice ideology as well as the belief that women should pay for birth control out of pocket, without exception.
Considering all of that, it's not surprising that the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) has a vested interest in the 2016 election. Which is why, according to its president, Cecile Richards, the Planned Parenthood Action Fund has made its first primary-race endorsement in its nearly 100-year history, throwing its support to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Richards says, "I have never seen a group of candidates running for president in the Republican party who have pledged to take away all the rights we have fought for for decades, at Planned Parenthood and across the country. They have pledged to deny access to Planned Parenthood; they have pledged to deny access to safe and legal abortion; they want to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which is providing birth control with no copay to millions of women. The stakes have never been higher. Thats why we, and our activists across the country, pushed to get an endorsement early because theyre ready to get going."
And, when asked whether potential backlash from fellow Democrat Bernie Sanders' supporters deterred PPFA from making the early endorsement, she said, "We have a lot of friends in Congress, we have a lot of friends in this race, but we have one true champion. To me, this isnt about politics." Clinton echoed that idea, saying "If its controversial, or if people are trying to make it a political, partisan action, then I hope they will reconsider, because this is about health care, and I have a long history of fighting for womens rights."......................
Ahead, read a transcript of our entire conversation (at website). Well worth the time IMHO.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)riversedge
(70,206 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)And hiring my daughter.
Nothing, I yell you.
riversedge
(70,206 posts)But it is rather humorous that they felt they needed to try to convince people.
I don't think it worked though and will probably bring in more donations for Bernie, so it works for my laughter and Bernie's coffer.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)questionseverything
(9,654 posts)both are so far removed from the average Americans life....they don't realize we are out here
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Are you serious?
questionseverything
(9,654 posts)i look at pp as a collective group that i support and am proud of...the half million dollar plus a year ceo, ms richards is just a figurehead...i do not blame her for not understanding how important this election is for the 99%
reminds me of a story
neighbor boy came thru the alley after school crying
whats wrong ,i asked
he had worn his brothers slippers to school and kids had made fun of him.....he tried to explain he had lost one of his shoes
the wealthy kids could not freaking understand why he didnt wear another pair, could not imagine only having one pair of shoes
i told him how proud of him i was for going to school anyway,that he should never worry what others thought because poor peops are the best peops and there are way more of us than them
then we knocked on every door in hood til we found a pair of hand me downs for the next day
<shrugs>
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Thanks for sharing it.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Who goes to Planned Parenthood? It's certainly not wealthy women.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I doubt she has been working at the clinic assisting with paps.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Or do you think women's should have CEO's instead of qualified medical staff performing pap smears?
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Either way she isn't working in the clinic itself so don't try to act like u ccould't understand the point.
Nailzberg
(4,610 posts)She was the DNC Deputy Communications Director. It's not like she was out job hunting.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)To automatically assume that a woman would not be able to get such a job without the influence of corrupt nepotism, rather than on the merits of her own accomplishments?
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Prob has nothing to do with privilege. Nothing to do with her family friends.
merrily
(45,251 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Most of those assumptions are wrong.
merrily
(45,251 posts)My post made no assumptions whatever.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)That's far more likely in the real world.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Of Hills buddy there? That would pay for a lot of paps.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 15, 2016, 08:55 AM - Edit history (1)
Don't hear much whining about them on DU.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)N/t
merrily
(45,251 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)That is not what I thought it was about.
riversedge
(70,206 posts)the reasons for the endorsement was that PP recognized that Hillary has a huge ground game, and many already promised delegates -in waiting. They see her as most likely to be in oval office and agree. PP is and will continuously be hit by Republicans from all angles. they can not afford to take a chance. they need a Democrat in the oval office.
cali
(114,904 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Damn, this pisses me off even more than the endorsement did. What the hell is Richards thinking?
oasis
(49,382 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)All 3 Democratic candidates are pro-choice. The premise that there was some need to do this and it was somehow done for me is rankest bs.
riversedge
(70,206 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)And having Ann Richards avatar, OMG, Ann was also an advocate for women's rights, raised very fine daughters of which we are blessed to have Cecile Richards as head of PP.
riversedge
(70,206 posts)Richards daughter. She was intelligent and strong.