2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWashington Post - Sanders won the 4th Democratic Debate
By Chris Cillizza
The fourth Democratic presidential debate -- and the last one before the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary next month -- is in the books. The best and the worst from the night are below. And make sure to check out our annotated debate transcript!
Winners
* Bernie Sanders: Yes, Sanders has one volume: Shouting. And, yes, he got tripped up a few times during the debate on his voting record -- especially on guns. But, throughout the debate's first hour -- the hour when most people, especially on the east coast and in the midwest, were watching -- he was the prime mover in virtually every discussion from Wall Street reform to healthcare to climate change. He was on offense, accusing Hillary Clinton of half-measures and political caution at a moment when boldness is required.
Sanders held his own in the foreign policy focused second hour of the debate, something he had failed to do in debates past. And, he had one of his best moments of the debate at an unlikely time -- in response to a question about his criticism of Bill Clinton's behavior. Sanders turned the question into one focused on how the campaign he is running is about policy not personal differences -- to much applause.
More than anything he said though, it was the passion and disruption that Sanders oozed from every pore over the two hours that should convince Democrats on the fence about the race into his camp. Sanders effectively positioned himself as the anti-status quo candidate in this race, a very good place to be in this electoral environment.
More: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/winners-and-losers-from-the-4th-democratic-presidential-debate/ar-BBolojN?ocid=spartandhp
Uncle Joe
(58,491 posts)Thanks for the thread, Quixote.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Duckfan
(1,268 posts)That's one hell of a review.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)Lots of hot sweaty collars at camp corporate.
merrily
(45,251 posts)that's only the internet WAPO.
This is impressive because Cillizza's been touting Hillary all along.
the man literally got fired for calling her a bitch in 2008. No really, he did. He has no business at all writing about her. If he had called Sanders a Hebe he wouldn't be covering Sanders.
merrily
(45,251 posts)dsc
(52,172 posts)he wrote over 50 articles for the post about the server for instance. He clearly hates Hillary, again if a reporter had called Sanders a Hebe and then wrote negative stuff about him, I would dismiss it out of hand. But I guess bitch is just fine.
merrily
(45,251 posts)But I guess bitch is just fine.
You're the only one who has typed anything remotely like that.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)He's basically a typical snarky "insider" type of journalistic "analyst.".
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton both used harsh tones-of-voice in last night's debate.
Whichever one of them is the nominee, I'm hoping for a gentler tone-of-voice in the general election debates.
Democat
(11,617 posts)I doubt it.
I am just hoping that whichever democrat is nominated, we can all stand behind him or her.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Check out how smooth-and-pleasant Obama's voice is while debating Mitt Romney:
Democat
(11,617 posts)Some of the right wing choices this time having nothing but shouting going for them.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)sorechasm
(631 posts)So, why is she in the loser column? Because she did nothing in the debate to slow the momentum that Sanders is building in Iowa and New Hampshire. Aside from guns, where Clinton scored a clean hit on Sanders, she was unable to effectively cast him as a pie-in-the-sky idealist and herself as the only person who could truly fight -- and win -- for Democratic priorities.
Chris Cillizza is feeling the Bern?
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)dsc
(52,172 posts)thinks she is a loser. I mean, just wow. I guess next she will have Scaife criticise her.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)dsc
(52,172 posts)all authored by him. Again, surprise surprise he hates Hillary I am shocked I tell you just shocked.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)dsc
(52,172 posts)so you can stop implying I am a liar anytime now.
http://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2015/09/25/50-headlines-that-reveal-wash-post-reporter-chr/205765
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Response to nashville_brook (Reply #17)
Name removed Message auto-removed
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Response to Quixote1818 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Response to Babel_17 (Reply #29)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)But Brock remains a prince of sleazy ethics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Brock
*http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141317462#post9
Response to Babel_17 (Reply #31)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)So you're a fan of Brock? After what he did to Anita Hill? And while he still plays by the same rules?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Real_Anita_Hill
Cilliza is an equal opportunity click hound. Pretty representative of his trade.
Response to Babel_17 (Reply #34)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Cillizza has been a major contributor to this effort, repeatedly claiming the email story "just keeps getting worse" and that it's "not going away," while claiming Clinton has an "honesty problem" and should "start panicking."
That's not hate, that's pretty much conventional wisdom at the moment.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)How stupid! Men in Iowa who were listening will not vote for her. Bookmark this post!