Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:11 AM Jan 2016

Oh, my. The Wall Street Journal says, "It’s time to take Bernie Sanders seriously."

http://www.wsj.com/articles/taking-sanders-seriously-1453248572

It’s time to take Bernie Sanders seriously. The Vermont Senator is leading in Iowa and New Hampshire and in Sunday’s debate he sounded for the first time like a candidate who thinks he can win. He still isn’t the favorite against the Clinton machine, but it’s no longer impossible to imagine the 74-year-old socialist as the Democratic nominee.


Note to WSJ: He's a DEMOCRATIC socialist.
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh, my. The Wall Street Journal says, "It’s time to take Bernie Sanders seriously." (Original Post) antigop Jan 2016 OP
Rupert Murdoch's WSJ takes Bernie seriously now? fascinating! emulatorloo Jan 2016 #1
Of course they will Thenewire Jan 2016 #4
add +1 to the "Bernie is unelectable" meme counter. nt antigop Jan 2016 #5
One-Wrong. daleanime Jan 2016 #6
sorry but your wrong if you think that Robbins Jan 2016 #12
You are SOOOOO dismissive of his VP choice. Or did you forget about that? nt valerief Jan 2016 #13
Wow... chervilant Jan 2016 #15
I distinctly remember both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama being Gene Debs Jan 2016 #16
LOL -- Good line. Armstead Jan 2016 #35
+1000 -- when they start sounding that disconnected from reality - I do wonder Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #43
Hate to confuse you with facts . . . hueymahl Jan 2016 #17
You sound like you work at one of those padfun Jan 2016 #18
Right, because Pantsuit is trouncing all the Republicans in one-on-one polling matchups. Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #19
You are wrong. leftcoastmountains Jan 2016 #24
Actually, it's the GOP's only chance floriduck Jan 2016 #25
Failures? Geronimoe Jan 2016 #27
Polling shows Bernie trouncing Trump, but you know that. NorthCarolina Jan 2016 #28
Drink! artislife Jan 2016 #30
I agree completely.. asuhornets Jan 2016 #32
I am so sick of hearing people say Obama is in anyway electable. (2008) Armstead Jan 2016 #34
now don't get sick,you poor thing! ,stranger things wendylaroux Jan 2016 #36
Then why does he do better in the one v one polls than Hillary? Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #40
I'm not about to repeat this to everyone else who is making the same false assumption. Thenewire Jan 2016 #42
BS - the Reich has 20 years of opposition research on Hillary - They can t wait to use it Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #44
Sanders gets cross-over votes, Clinton does not. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #47
I am surprised they didn't call him a "communist" awake Jan 2016 #2
gotta keep your powder dry. They're waiting for the GE FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #3
Claire McCaskil went there...no problem for her. libdem4life Jan 2016 #45
Which means the attacks by the corporate media will soon begin book_worm Jan 2016 #7
Bring-'em appal_jack Jan 2016 #8
Clinton scandals... asuhornets Jan 2016 #33
No matter how much you wish it away... appal_jack Jan 2016 #38
Oh Plzz.. asuhornets Jan 2016 #39
Yea, but should we worry about it, seriously? nolabels Jan 2016 #10
WSJ/Fox media first. Then other outlets will pick it up as they are scared of being called 'biased' emulatorloo Jan 2016 #11
Bring it... DUbeornot2be Jan 2016 #20
In Iowa, Clinton leads by 4 points in the Real Clear Politics average. Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #9
she had more than a 3 point lead over Obama at RCL with just 10 days left before the '08 Iowa Caucus corkhead Jan 2016 #22
here it comes retrowire Jan 2016 #14
Attention 1%ers! We rabble have been roused corkhead Jan 2016 #21
Hehe. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #23
Pitchfork and Torch are ready Half-Century Man Jan 2016 #26
Oooh,good one! wendylaroux Jan 2016 #37
The WSJ editors are a bunch of Johnnies-come-lately Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #29
"Note to WSJ: He's a DEMOCRATIC socialist." SoapBox Jan 2016 #31
The one huge issue is that Sanders will start the debate all over again for the rladdi Jan 2016 #41
Let's hear it for the Pitchfork Voters!! libdem4life Jan 2016 #46

Thenewire

(130 posts)
4. Of course they will
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:24 AM
Jan 2016

They want him to get the nomination since it is the republicans best chance at winning the presidency. I'm so sick of people thinking that Sanders is in any way electable, he is just as removed from reality as Trump and very one dimensional. If Sanders gets the nomination we will all pay the consequences of his failures.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
12. sorry but your wrong if you think that
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jan 2016

The entire GOP playbook is to run against clinton.

How electable is clinton if she is having problems with one you call unelectable.

Clinton has plenty of GE number problems.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
15. Wow...
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:24 PM
Jan 2016

Senator Sanders polls better than HRC against EVERY Republican. I'm so sick of people thinking that Sanders is in any way UNELECTABLE!

Well, durn. I surmise from your hilariously incorrect post that HRC's supporters are getting a wee bit nervous.


 

Gene Debs

(582 posts)
16. I distinctly remember both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama being
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:30 PM
Jan 2016

loudly declared "unelectable."

And precisely what "failures" of Sanders' are you referring to?

This post seems so crazy I almost wonder if it was posted from a wildlife refuge in Oregon.

padfun

(1,786 posts)
18. You sound like you work at one of those
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jan 2016

Republican phone banks. Or now days, a internet room where they pay to roam the forums and give misleading information.

And I'll bet we hear from more and more of these hot rooms. Looking at post counts can be revealing as well.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
19. Right, because Pantsuit is trouncing all the Republicans in one-on-one polling matchups.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jan 2016

Oh, wait, she isn't.

leftcoastmountains

(2,968 posts)
24. You are wrong.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:11 PM
Jan 2016

But as they say time will tell. Hillary has no coattails. People will follow Bernie. They will not follow Hillary.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
25. Actually, it's the GOP's only chance
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:13 PM
Jan 2016

of preventing Hill from getting the presidency since none of their candidates has a chance in hell.

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
27. Failures?
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:29 PM
Jan 2016

Do you mean like Bill Clinton's deregulation of banking and free trade agreements, or Hillary's support for Iraq War?

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
28. Polling shows Bernie trouncing Trump, but you know that.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jan 2016

I'm sure that you also know your comments lack merit. Wouldn't it be best to simply go with the truth of why you despise Sanders? I suspect you can't because it would expose your true allegiance, the political philosophy you truly adhere too which you know to be far to the right of what the party base stands for.

asuhornets

(2,405 posts)
32. I agree completely..
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:42 PM
Jan 2016

He just a politician like everyone else. One-dimensional is his middle name. ASk him a question about ISIS-he talks about the economy-which is not a bad thing, But that was not the question. If he does become the the Democratic nominee and he won't , the republicans are going to turn him into a cartoon character. -he is not even a Democrat.

wendylaroux

(2,925 posts)
36. now don't get sick,you poor thing! ,stranger things
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jan 2016

have happened.ya know,like more US citizens finally waking up and
realizing there is a candidate who actually GIVES A SHIT.

GO FOR BERNIE

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
40. Then why does he do better in the one v one polls than Hillary?
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 02:11 PM
Jan 2016

Hillary is the un-electable one.

She is a terrible candidate who panics every time things go bad. Besides that, she just has so much baggage it can't be overcome.

On top of that, her favorable numbers are so horribly upside down that those numbers in themselves prove that she is a long shot to win the GE, at best.

Thenewire

(130 posts)
42. I'm not about to repeat this to everyone else who is making the same false assumption.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jan 2016

But those polls are absolutely meaningless. They would still be meaningless if Clinton was ahead of every republican by 20+ points.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
44. BS - the Reich has 20 years of opposition research on Hillary - They can t wait to use it
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jan 2016

Did you miss the sub title of the article?

The socialist beats Trump by 15 points in one recent survey


and not just in 1 survey in almost ALL surveys!

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
47. Sanders gets cross-over votes, Clinton does not.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 04:24 PM
Jan 2016

Therefore, your post is incorrect.

Sanders is popular with Independents and a handful of Republicans.

Few Independents and NO Republicans will vote for Clinton.

If he's the nominee, he wins. If she is, the Republicans win.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
7. Which means the attacks by the corporate media will soon begin
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:33 AM
Jan 2016

No more ignoring, but much more attacking.

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
8. Bring-'em
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jan 2016

I'd much rather exert energy defending principles of populism, true democracy, justice, and equity than get mired down in further Clinton scandals and bait-and-switch corporatism.

-app

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
38. No matter how much you wish it away...
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:58 PM
Jan 2016

...the last genuine news story on the private e-mail server has not yet been written. Do you really want that hanging over our election right now? Do you pretend to know what was and was not on that private server? How about ties to Wall Street, speaking fees from HMO's & banks, many possible instances of quid pro quo between the then Secretary of State and foreign donors to the Clinton Foundation?

And that's just scratching the surface of the most plausible and presently-visible problems.

The history of the Clintons is a history replete with scandals, and the ire of the right wing is only one small root of that larger tree.

-app

asuhornets

(2,405 posts)
39. Oh Plzz..
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 02:07 PM
Jan 2016

You sound like Fox News and Donald Trump rolled up into one. Hillary testified for 11 hours and nothing was found. And no I don't care about Wall Street and speaking fees. And who cares about the ire of the right wing. You sound scared. Hillary will eat any republican for lunch in a debate. And personally I think she is holding back on Bernie Sanders. She knows and so do I - he will never be president.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
29. The WSJ editors are a bunch of Johnnies-come-lately
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:39 PM
Jan 2016

We've been taking Bernie's campaign seriously for months.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
31. "Note to WSJ: He's a DEMOCRATIC socialist."
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:41 PM
Jan 2016

Isn't it pathetic that they can't even get this correct?

I think half of it is intensional and the other half is just because the are stupid fucks.

rladdi

(581 posts)
41. The one huge issue is that Sanders will start the debate all over again for the
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 02:13 PM
Jan 2016

Health care bill, giving the Republicans the opportunity to trash it for good. Bernie has major changes he wants to do on the HCB.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Oh, my. The Wall Street J...