Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 06:48 PM Jan 2016

Dear Hillary: RED BAIT People Like Me and Lose My Vote In ANY Election








I will not stand by and let you use Socialists as a political target and give you my vote. Ever.

I wouldn’t do it for a candidate who uses anti-gay smears to get votes.

I wouldn’t do it for a candidate who uses racism to get votes—a major reason I couldn’t stand you in 2008.

You do not have permission to trade my dignity or the dignity of the left as currency to finance your ambition, devoid of conscience as it clearly is.

Should there be anyone in your camp, or any other, who wants to accuse me of helping to elect a Republican because I demand to be treated with respect as part of the coalition, please be advised: it is you and your set who believe that for every vote you lose on the left, you gain more than one on the right.

That is your calculation, not mine.

Loyalty and decency do not require me to serve as a willing target for an ambitious, amoral campaign. If that means ejection from what’s left of the coalition trying to elect a Democrat, please remember: i will already be gone.

I don’t care if you or your “centrists” are angry or dismissive. I don’t care about your career. I will not see my kind trashed by you and give you my vote.

Again, that is your calculation, Madame Secretary, not mine. I hope you’ll be happy with the results.

And yes, that is a portrait of Eugene V. Debs, a person with a level of integrity and care for working people you will never, ever understand, let alone achieve.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/01/20/1472562/-Dear-Hillary-Red-Bait-People-Like-Me-and-Lose-My-Vote-In-ANY-Election
142 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dear Hillary: RED BAIT People Like Me and Lose My Vote In ANY Election (Original Post) Segami Jan 2016 OP
Ouch. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #1
Way To Fucking Go! You Are Echoing the Sentiment of A HUGGGGEEE Number of People CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #37
You don't need to convince me, I've been a Bernista since the early 80's. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #41
Liberals don't red bait. Conservatives do. Hortensis Jan 2016 #80
Better inform your associates here. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #97
No. My associates often say they would vote for both candidates. Hortensis Jan 2016 #110
What are you on about? What does that have to do with red baiting? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #112
Liberals don't red bait. Conservatives do. Hortensis Jan 2016 #116
Since they red bait you just reclassified several of your associates here as conservatives. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #120
do'h. PatrynXX Jan 2016 #103
Hillary is a liberal and her supporters liberals and independents. Hortensis Jan 2016 #117
Hillary is not a liberal Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #137
Ridiculous premise. Hillary is a progressive liberal. Hortensis Jan 2016 #141
"No true Scotsman...." robbob Jan 2016 #106
Hillary is a PROGRESSIVE liberal. Hortensis Jan 2016 #118
Like the progressively-resolved problem of Saddam's WMDs and al-Qaeda membership? arcane1 Jan 2016 #129
"Clinton...always been..pretty far to the left." Hortensis Jan 2016 #142
k/r 840high Jan 2016 #59
Their is not red bate: Sanders is a socialist he choice to be one Himself lewebley3 Jan 2016 #94
Well that was coherent. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #99
I wonder if Red bating [sic] is like masturbating. n/t geardaddy Jan 2016 #107
They want our precious bodily fluids... beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #108
that's why... green917 Jan 2016 #115
No flouride in your dihydrogen monoxide! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #121
Jack D. Ripper geardaddy Jan 2016 #122
Some folks seem to think that was a documentary. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #123
yikes! H2O Man Jan 2016 #111
Just checked out lewebely3 stats, interesting. Bohunk68 Jan 2016 #130
I didn't notice that. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #132
I hope you feel better--seriously, whether it's flu or exhaustion. Get some rest. n/t zazen Jan 2016 #109
Another day, another incoherent one liner. dorkzilla Jan 2016 #119
Great piece! Thanks to the person who wrote it on DailyKos, and to you for posting it here. kath Jan 2016 #2
my grandpa was a socialist and got blackballed trying to organize a roguevalley Jan 2016 #21
Both of my grandpas were union organizers back in the '30s and '40s. At least one of them was kath Jan 2016 #45
Hillary isn't responsible when people tangentially connected to her say and do things that displease Metric System Jan 2016 #3
Haha, like Claire McCaskill is "tangentially" connected to Hillary? thereismore Jan 2016 #6
Bull. McCaskill is supporting her bid for the presidency but she is NOT close with the Clintons. She Metric System Jan 2016 #9
She is her attack person. nt thereismore Jan 2016 #10
. . . with just enough distance for plausible deniability. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #87
My ass she doesn't speak for the campaign. pangaia Jan 2016 #23
Get Reallll! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #38
Yeah, funny how she and other "independent thinkers" all say the same thing at the same time Armstead Jan 2016 #57
McCaskill DOES and IS speaking for Hillary Clinton and her campaign. CoffeeCat Jan 2016 #104
"Tangentially"? WTF? Do you expect anyone to be dumb enough to believe that one. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #8
Where's your proof that she's being told by the campaign to do this? Metric System Jan 2016 #12
Where's your proof that she has absolutely no connection to the campaign? hobbit709 Jan 2016 #13
The same 'proof' that told me Saddam didn't have any WMDs. pangaia Jan 2016 #30
For me it was PowerToThePeople Jan 2016 #35
Well, yes. That too. Hans Blix knew the score. pangaia Jan 2016 #62
Give me a decade and a FOIA request. morningfog Jan 2016 #31
ROFL! Segami Jan 2016 #15
I thought of this.. pangaia Jan 2016 #29
Well Conceived... Nice Job! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #40
ROFL! Melissa G Jan 2016 #44
This is where the internet becomes educational. senz Jan 2016 #63
Oh I see, Senators aren't connected to candidates but Twitter supporters are. DemocraticWing Jan 2016 #16
Now how does that go? I have read it a thousand times on DU.... Oh, I remember! A Simple Game Jan 2016 #24
BULLSHIT and you know it. Don't play fucking stupid. morningfog Jan 2016 #27
Nice try. TBF Jan 2016 #138
Bernie wrote a book about Eugene V. Dobs. thereismore Jan 2016 #4
He also read Marx, Engels, et al. pangaia Jan 2016 #33
So did I. nt thereismore Jan 2016 #36
Yeah me to. You know what? I actually learned something from it. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #88
Well. SHE's toAstT now! OilemFirchen Jan 2016 #5
How can they not see that this will backfire? Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #7
Recommended and BOOKMARKED. pa28 Jan 2016 #11
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #14
K&R CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #17
K & R SoapBox Jan 2016 #18
Thanks for the post and the reminder EndElectoral Jan 2016 #19
Damn son is your name really Dylan ? ValasHune Jan 2016 #20
DY-LAN FrostyAusty Jan 2016 #70
KICKING, Need To Bookmark, Too Much Info In My Head ChiciB1 Jan 2016 #22
K&R 99Forever Jan 2016 #25
Hear, Hear !!! WillyT Jan 2016 #26
K&R Thanks for posting. eom Purveyor Jan 2016 #28
Kick azmom Jan 2016 #32
AMEN!! Tell it, bro! John Poet Jan 2016 #34
There are enough of us to take over the Independent party Kalidurga Jan 2016 #39
It's not red bait. Bernie IS a socialist ecstatic Jan 2016 #42
This shows a lack of understanding the difference between communism artislife Jan 2016 #47
And that's what he'd be facing and it's why he'd lose. nt ecstatic Jan 2016 #48
Because people don't understand more than you do? artislife Jan 2016 #50
Running on Socialism and raising taxes redstateblues Jan 2016 #52
Ha..I like that you have a favorite meme to push. nt artislife Jan 2016 #55
Calling it a meme doesn't mean it's not true redstateblues Jan 2016 #56
I think you meant to write Hillary in that little scenario...nt artislife Jan 2016 #60
And you base that theory on what? blackspade Jan 2016 #75
+1,000,000 Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #51
This is totally wishful thinking on your part. senz Jan 2016 #65
So the 81% of Dems and 58% of the general population who want Medicare for All-- eridani Jan 2016 #67
Are you trying to be funny? blackspade Jan 2016 #74
"Most Americans are comfortable with the current mix of socialism and well regulated capitalism." passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #79
They have been whittling away at a half way decent mix for the past 40 years. We need to get back Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #89
Absolutely! nt 7wo7rees Jan 2016 #43
Wow! Autumn Jan 2016 #46
Tell it! RoccoR5955 Jan 2016 #49
:) The certainty of that reminds me of this Babel_17 Jan 2016 #53
Snap! virgdem Jan 2016 #54
That last paragraph makes me really sad. SMC22307 Jan 2016 #58
The Legacy of McCarthyism AOR Jan 2016 #61
Great read, Thanks! blackspade Jan 2016 #77
Another couple of Socialists... Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #64
Don't forget MLK. nt tblue37 Jan 2016 #92
And another one hobbit709 Jan 2016 #113
And a Presbyterian minister as well, like Fred Rogers. Manifestor_of_Light Jan 2016 #133
"An ambitious, amoral campaign" -- succinct and true. nt senz Jan 2016 #66
That's worth a hoo-rah. malthaussen Jan 2016 #68
I, in_cog_ni_to, STAND WITH by MrJayTee! RED BAITING is the lowest of Hillary's lows and she has in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #69
+1000 blackspade Jan 2016 #71
All it takes for the word "socialist" to be OK again... Helen Borg Jan 2016 #72
Or to have capitalism fail again as miserably as it did in 1929. n/t deutsey Jan 2016 #81
Perhaps, but it kinda did in 2008 and yet... Helen Borg Jan 2016 #82
Not as bad as 1929. deutsey Jan 2016 #83
But wait! Gamecock Lefty Jan 2016 #73
Need some vinigar with your word salad? blackspade Jan 2016 #76
And Hillary's so-called surrogates are nothing near as nasty of King Bernie's supporters on DU! AlbertCat Jan 2016 #96
amen!!!!!! oldandhappy Jan 2016 #78
It's becoming obvious the the Democratic wing of the Democratic party has had enough! raindaddy Jan 2016 #84
Then you will get the president that you deserve Tarc Jan 2016 #85
Going by the polls, that'll be the case if Hillary wins the nom Lordquinton Jan 2016 #95
If she goes down that road, I won't be voting FOR her, I'll be voting AGAINST the Republican. phleshdef Jan 2016 #86
Look out, there's a straw man over there! Nitram Jan 2016 #90
K&R Kermitt Gribble Jan 2016 #91
Thank you for this courageous OP Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #93
+ 1, well said! Utopian Leftist Jan 2016 #98
Off topic - Anyone else think Debs looks like a bald George W. Bush in that picture? MadDAsHell Jan 2016 #100
I agree Segami. It would be a shame saidsimplesimon Jan 2016 #101
Hasn't been too bad so far. HassleCat Jan 2016 #102
Kickin' Faux pas Jan 2016 #105
And I don't even consider Bernie a leftist. Scruffy1 Jan 2016 #114
Right? K&R to your post - TBF Jan 2016 #139
K & R ! TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #124
So, we've gone from FDR to Eugene Debbs . ... reACTIONary Jan 2016 #125
More "I wont vote for HIllary in the GE" thread, while this should be RARE at DU randys1 Jan 2016 #126
David Brock was already at this a couple of months ago, and now the other employees are on it. arcane1 Jan 2016 #127
I must be losing my hearing, but I could have sworn I just heard Chuckie Toad on MTP Bohunk68 Jan 2016 #128
hillary's self serving attacks on hopemountain Jan 2016 #131
Thank you mrsadm Jan 2016 #134
I am a Socialist. I will not vote for ANY candidate who engages in red-baiting, ever. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #135
wait for the the General Election if BS is the candidate. the GOP are masters of demonizing Bill USA Jan 2016 #136
It's a sign of the times Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #140

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
37. Way To Fucking Go! You Are Echoing the Sentiment of A HUGGGGEEE Number of People
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:33 PM
Jan 2016

which derived from this dirty crap just serves to demonstrate ... ONE MORE TIME... just how little character and integrity Mrs Clinton possesses in her own right. Entirely her doing with not another soul to blame...

I don't care about surrogates doing the dirty shit... THIS IS Madame' Secretary's campaign and which has been afforded EVERY MOTHER EFFING ADVANTAGE FROM WALL STREET CA$H TO A BOUGHT AND PAID FOR IN THE TANK CORPORATIST MEDIA...notwithstanding BULLSHIT ENDORSEMENTS BY THE LEADERSHIP OF MAJOR UNIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE IGNORED THE WISHES OF THEIR MEMBERSHIP e.g., As noted above.

Clinton Incorporated has it all and cannot even begin to win fair and square!

People are not listening to this crap, and we in fact fully expected this shit when the road got a little bit bumpy!

The fact is that the background and history associated with Bernie's major primary opponent (anointed front runner/inevitable nominee), is far more of a drag on her own campaign than anything that Bernie can say or do to detract from her candidacy.


Bernie offers a sincere and well thought out path of hope that his opponent's mealy mouth incrementalism coupled with syrupy lip service cannot and will not fly against. People are demanding... sincerity, truth and integrity this election associated with a drive for real palpable change...

Bernie Sanders offers that script while the Clinton Incorporated campaign cannot and never will.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
41. You don't need to convince me, I've been a Bernista since the early 80's.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:43 PM
Jan 2016

I never dreamed that the senator from my home state would have such a huge following.


Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
80. Liberals don't red bait. Conservatives do.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 12:20 PM
Jan 2016

Hillary is a liberal, and by far most of her supporters are liberal and independents. VERY few conservatives.

P.S., the vast majority of us are also fine with and/or strongly support socialization of systems that work particularly well that way, like medicine.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
110. No. My associates often say they would vote for both candidates.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 05:02 PM
Jan 2016

A bunch of them say that right here on DU, and often.

Unfortunately, some others just seem to need opponents to vanquish far more than they want allies to pursue victory with -- even when that means their designated opponents are their natural allies who are pursuing the same goals.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
112. What are you on about? What does that have to do with red baiting?
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 05:05 PM
Jan 2016

Anyone who red baits to smear a Dem candidate is no ally, imo.

There's another name for that kind of behaviour and it rhymes with bat trucking.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
120. Since they red bait you just reclassified several of your associates here as conservatives.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 05:35 PM
Jan 2016

I agree with you, ANYONE who red baits isn't a liberal.

Thanks for clearing that up!


Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
137. Hillary is not a liberal
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 08:00 PM
Jan 2016

She is an opportunist. She is a "liberal" to one group when the need arises, a "centrist" or "moderate" to another, a hardliner to yet another. She has been a corporatist since at least her early days in Arkansas as a corporate lawyer who worked against residential utility ratepayers in Little Rock, even going so far as to claim in court that giving residential utility customers a break on their rates would amount to "unconstitutional confiscation of property". She was best buds with Arkansas's richest Republicans in her later days as the state's first lady, and she got "Mr. Arkansas Republican", Jackson Stephens, to help fund her husband's 1992 presidential campaign.

As President Bill Clinton's wife, she supported some of her husband's really crappy legislation, including "the end of welfare as we know it", and repeal of Glass-Steagall. As Senator from New York, she championed the "vast right-wing conspiracy's" bogus case for war against Iraq. She has supported regime change in secular Middle-Eastern countries that has resulted in chaos and loss of rights for women in those countries. And now she is red-baiting Bernie, who is no more left than Robert Kennedy was.

Really, she is NOT a liberal.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
118. Hillary is a PROGRESSIVE liberal.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 05:32 PM
Jan 2016

Her supporters are all PROGRESSIVES by definition as they want to tackle and fix large problems, using the power of government as needed.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
142. "Clinton...always been..pretty far to the left."
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 06:15 AM
Jan 2016

Last edited Fri Jan 22, 2016, 07:27 AM - Edit history (1)

From FiveThirtyEight: "Hillary Clinton Was Liberal. Hillary Clinton Is Liberal.
A bunch of reporters have recently discovered a shocking truth: Hillary Clinton is liberal! (I heard a rumor that Columbo has been helping with the investigation.)

We’ve gotten this raft of “Clinton is liberal” exposés as Clinton has revved up her 2016 campaign, speaking out in support of gay marriage, a pathway to citizenship for immigrants in the U.S. illegally, and criminal justice reform. But what many of these articles miss is that Clinton has always been, by most measures, pretty far to the left. When she’s shifted positions, it has been in concert with the entire Democratic Party."


http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/hillary-clinton-was-liberal-hillary-clinton-is-liberal/

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
130. Just checked out lewebely3 stats, interesting.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:28 PM
Jan 2016

Status is in review, 0% chance of serving on a jury. Tells a lot.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
119. Another day, another incoherent one liner.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 05:32 PM
Jan 2016

By the way, SOCIALIST is not the same thing as COMMUNIST.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
21. my grandpa was a socialist and got blackballed trying to organize a
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:30 PM
Jan 2016

Railroad union. I am a trillion percent with the op

kath

(10,565 posts)
45. Both of my grandpas were union organizers back in the '30s and '40s. At least one of them was
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:07 PM
Jan 2016

Blackballed for this. My dad was president of the faculty union at his college, and led them out on strike over healthcare benefits.

Both of my Dad's parents were Irish immigrants. When my dad was growing up, a pic of the Sacred Heart of Jesus hung on one wall of their living room and a picture of FDR on another. How appalled they would be to see what has happened to the Party of the New Deal.

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
3. Hillary isn't responsible when people tangentially connected to her say and do things that displease
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jan 2016

you.

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
9. Bull. McCaskill is supporting her bid for the presidency but she is NOT close with the Clintons. She
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:05 PM
Jan 2016

speaks for herself, not the campaign.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
23. My ass she doesn't speak for the campaign.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:43 PM
Jan 2016

Biden.. we don't need socialism wasn't for the campaign either, eh.

And the rest of the exact same communist references that are about to start popping out.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
104. McCaskill DOES and IS speaking for Hillary Clinton and her campaign.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 03:49 PM
Jan 2016

Who are you kidding? Just like Hillary used Nebraska Senator to enter my state of Iowa, in 08, and declar during a press conference, "I just love it that his name is Barack Hussein Obama!" Yeah, Hillary often tasks her cohorts with speaking the dirty words for her. To suggest that Clinton and McCaskill are not working in tandem, is ludicrous.

Kerrey later apologized for his remarks. I doubt that McCaskill will.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Claire McCaskill Headed to Iowa to Campaign For Hillary Clinton"

With Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton in a tight race in Iowa, Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill will head to the Hawkeye State this weekend to campaign for the Democratic frontrunner.

McCaskill will join fellow Sens. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota in a series of stops in eastern Iowa, which tends to be the most Democratic part of the state.

The group will focus on Clinton’s “commitment to moving America forward by guaranteeing women’s right to make their own health-care choices,” a statement from Clinton’s campaign said. “Hillary Clinton will always stand up for Planned Parenthood and for a woman’s right to choose.”

The group will stop in Mount Vernon, Dubuque, Waterloo and Mason City Friday and Saturday. Baldwin will make an additional stop on Saturday in Iowa City.

http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/the-buzz/article54098965.html

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
8. "Tangentially"? WTF? Do you expect anyone to be dumb enough to believe that one.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:05 PM
Jan 2016

The spinning at Camp Weathervane must be redlining the turbine blades by now.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
13. Where's your proof that she has absolutely no connection to the campaign?
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:14 PM
Jan 2016

You started this spin post, you prove your claim.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
35. For me it was
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:03 PM
Jan 2016

the NATO weapons inspectors on the ground in Iraq saying that they had no WMDs that got me to believe that he did not have any WMDs.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
31. Give me a decade and a FOIA request.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:58 PM
Jan 2016

For fucks sake, have the backbone to step the fuck up and own it.

It's pathetic to watch you and your ilk try to have it both ways. This is why you LOST in 2008 and why you will LOSE in 2016.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
29. I thought of this..
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:56 PM
Jan 2016

WIKI--
"The turbofan or fanjet is a type of airbreathing jet engine that is widely used in aircraft propulsion. The word "turbofan" ........."refers to a gas turbine engine which takes mechanical energy from combustion,[1] and the fan, a ducted fan that uses the mechanical energy from the gas turbine to accelerate air rearwards.

"...whereas all the air taken in by a turbojet passes through the turbine" .......," in a turbofan some of that air bypasses the turbine. A turbofan thus can be thought of as a turbojet being used to drive a ducted fan, with both of those contributing to the thrust."

Claire McCaskill, and it now looks like Biden, is/are the air that bypasses the turbine.

And in the end, it is all just hot air anyway.

I was going to edit this better, but I have already had a couple margaritas.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
63. This is where the internet becomes educational.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 02:57 AM
Jan 2016

I kind of knew what a turbine was but had no idea about "redlining." Thought maybe it was an accounting term. So good ol' wikipedia informed me that the red area on the tachometer is called the red lines. Nice to know. Thanks!

And, as a bonus, it's an apt metaphor for Camp Weathervane's spin operation. So thanks again!

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
24. Now how does that go? I have read it a thousand times on DU.... Oh, I remember!
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:44 PM
Jan 2016

It goes something like this; " I really like Bernie and would like to support him but if his supporters are going to be so mean and lie about Hillary I just can't support Bernie."

Sound familiar to you? So... "I would really like to support Hillary but her supporters and spokespersons are so mean and lie all the time so I really can't support her."

Goose and Gander.

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
4. Bernie wrote a book about Eugene V. Dobs.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:05 PM - Edit history (1)

Actually I take that back. It was a documentary that he made.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
7. How can they not see that this will backfire?
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:04 PM
Jan 2016

Honestly, I just don't get it. Even being desperate doesn't account for this one.




http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/1/17/1471163/-Red-dawn-More-Iowa-Democratic-caucus-goers-identify-as-socialist-than-capitalist


^snip^


A little-noticed data point in the new Selzer & Co. Iowa poll, in fact, shows that 43 percent of likely voters in the Feb. 1 caucuses say they would use the word "socialist" to describe themselves.

And to be very clear, this question was not whether they would vote for a socialist or sympathize with socialism; it's whether they consider themselves socialist.

The 43 percent of likely Iowa Democratic caucus-goers who self-identify as socialist is actually more than the number who identify themselves as capitalist — 38 percent.


pa28

(6,145 posts)
11. Recommended and BOOKMARKED.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:12 PM
Jan 2016

Running such a deeply cynical campaign is going to leave permanent scars on the party.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
22. KICKING, Need To Bookmark, Too Much Info In My Head
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jan 2016

right now. Between the Australian Open (love my tennis) and the NASTY, UNDERHANDED way the Clinton campaign is COMPLETELY turning me into a raging maniac, I gotta take a break!

Keep fighting back, keep EXPOSING all the LIES! DISGUSTING!

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
39. There are enough of us to take over the Independent party
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:35 PM
Jan 2016

just sayin. I don't think they would like it, but they should have thought of their numbers and putting up a serious candidate which they never do.

ecstatic

(32,704 posts)
42. It's not red bait. Bernie IS a socialist
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:48 PM
Jan 2016

That is the truth. Most Americans are comfortable with the current mix of socialism and well regulated capitalism. Bernie's views are not mainstream and would cost us the White House and up to 4 Supreme Court nominations.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
47. This shows a lack of understanding the difference between communism
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:38 PM
Jan 2016

and being a Social Democrat. This also shows a lack of understanding what the phrase red menace means.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
56. Calling it a meme doesn't mean it's not true
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 01:31 AM
Jan 2016

If Bernie wins the nomination he will get crushed in the GE

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
65. This is totally wishful thinking on your part.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 03:03 AM
Jan 2016

If Bernie's views were not mainstream he wouldn't be picking up so much steam (and voters) as he rolls along. People hear him and love him.

Apparently you are not familiar with Franklin Delano Roosevelt who made life more livable for millions of Americans for decades, until Reagan undid the New Deal, and was constantly called "socialist" by Republicans.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
67. So the 81% of Dems and 58% of the general population who want Medicare for All--
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 08:02 AM
Jan 2016

--are not mainstream?

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
74. Are you trying to be funny?
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 11:44 AM
Jan 2016

"Most Americans are comfortable with the current mix of socialism and well regulated capitalism. "

Obviously not. The American People want more socialism and actual regulation of Wall Street.
Sanders views are very mainstream and polling proves it.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
79. "Most Americans are comfortable with the current mix of socialism and well regulated capitalism."
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 12:16 PM
Jan 2016

They are? The crowds showing up for Bernie might just prove you wrong. The raging and rising economic inequality in this country is another way that you might just be proven wrong.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
89. They have been whittling away at a half way decent mix for the past 40 years. We need to get back
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 02:07 PM
Jan 2016

to a good mix.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
58. That last paragraph makes me really sad.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 01:38 AM
Jan 2016

Perhaps because I just learned the name of my father's biological parents, and my brother and I are *wailing* on ancestry.com. Cambria Steel machinist, janitor, baker, electrician, WWI veterans, farmers... like most American families, we're workers. How have things gotten *so* out of whack in this country?!

 

AOR

(692 posts)
61. The Legacy of McCarthyism
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 01:46 AM
Jan 2016

--by Ellen Schrecker

http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/mccarthy/schrecker6.htm

(Snips)

"Quantification aside, it may be helpful to look at the specific sectors of American society that McCarthyism touched. Such an appraisal, tentative though it must be, may offer some insight into the extent of the damage and into the ways in which the anti-Communist crusade influenced American society, politics, and culture. We should keep in mind, however, that McCarthyism's main impact may well have been in what did not happen rather than in what did the social reforms that were never adopted, the diplomatic initiatives that were not pursued, the workers who were not organized into unions, the books that were not written, and the movies that were never filmed."

"The most obvious casualty was the American left. The institutional toll is clear. The Communist party, already damaged by internal problems, dwindled into insignificance and all the organizations associated with it disappeared. The destruction of the front groups and the left-led unions may well have had a more deleterious impact on American politics than the decline of the party itself. With their demise, the nation lost the institutional network that had created a public space where serious alternatives to the status quo could be presented. Moreover, with the disappearance of a vigorous movement on their left, moderate reform groups were more exposed to right-wing attacks and thus rendered less effective."

"In the realm of social policy, for example, McCarthyism may have aborted much-needed reforms. As the nation's politics swung to the right after World War II, the federal government abandoned the unfinished agenda of the New Deal. Measures like national health insurance, a social reform embraced by the rest of the industrialized world, simply fell by the wayside. The left liberal political coalition that might have supported health reforms and similar projects was torn apart by the anti-Communist crusade. Moderates feared being identified with anything that seemed too radical, and people to the left of them were either unheard or under attack. McCarthyism further contributed to the attenuation of the reform impulse by helping to divert the attention of the labor movement, the strongest institution within the old New Deal coalition, from external organizing to internal politicking."

"The nation's cultural and intellectual life suffered as well. While there were other reasons that TV offered a bland menu of quiz shows and westerns during the late 1950s, McCarthy-era anxieties clearly played a role. Similarly, the blacklist contributed to the reluctance of the film industry to grapple with controversial social or political issues. In the intellectual world, cold war liberals also avoided controversy. They celebrated the "end of ideology," claiming that the United States' uniquely pragmatic approach to politics made the problems that had once concerned left- wing ideologists irrelevant. Consensus historians pushed that formulation into the past and described a nation that had supposedly never experienced serious internal conflict. It took the civil rights movement and the Vietnam War to end this complacency and bring reality back in. "

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
133. And a Presbyterian minister as well, like Fred Rogers.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:51 PM
Jan 2016

My oldest friend is a multi-generational friendship. Her grandfather and my father were union organizers in the bad old days of the 1930s when they were trying to get labor laws passed.

Norman Thomas had Sunday dinner with her grandparents, and she has "Dear Comrade" letters from him to her grandparents.

He ran for President six times. His grandson is Evan Thomas, journalist, who has written most recently a book about Nixon.

malthaussen

(17,195 posts)
68. That's worth a hoo-rah.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 10:28 AM
Jan 2016


It's kind of amazing that a savvy politician would allow contempt to creep out so obviously. Setting aside accusations of "desperation," running a campaign on the principle of "yes, I suck, but the other guy is worse" is bad tactics. Isn't it a principle of advertising that if you downgrade the other guy's brand too much, the marks begin to wonder if all the products suck? We surely have a "plague a' both your houses" mood in this country. It used to be, democrats wanted to court the voters and get the largest turnout possible. Clearly, the GOP employs a strategy of alienating and disempowering as many as they can, so that only their fanatical faithful will vote. Surely it isn't possible that the 3rd-way Democrats think in much the same way? Surely.

-- Mal

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
69. I, in_cog_ni_to, STAND WITH by MrJayTee! RED BAITING is the lowest of Hillary's lows and she has
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 10:41 AM
Jan 2016

Plenty of others, but this one takes the cake, ices the cake, sprinkles the cake, decorates the cake and adds a freakin' cherry on top of the cake!

Yeah, I stand with by MrJayTee!

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
72. All it takes for the word "socialist" to be OK again...
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 11:35 AM
Jan 2016

Is million of people on Youtube, on their blogs, whenever they speak, to use the word proudly, knowing that at the core there is a call for compassion and solidarity.

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
82. Perhaps, but it kinda did in 2008 and yet...
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jan 2016

Now we seem to be back to square one. Bubbles emerging and popping, same crap all over...

Gamecock Lefty

(700 posts)
73. But wait!
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 11:35 AM
Jan 2016

Ol Bernie is being called a socialist. Well duh - isn't he?

And ol Bernie is railing against the establishment yet he's been in politics for how long - since 1972?

And ol Bernie is now talking about Hillary's "coronation," falling back into the same tired old argument that Hillary expects to be crowned Queen. King Bernie can't have it both ways.

And Hillary's so-called surrogates are nothing near as nasty of King Bernie's supporters on DU!

You want a fight? You got it!

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
96. And Hillary's so-called surrogates are nothing near as nasty of King Bernie's supporters on DU!
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016

Oh well then....

I'll have to vote for Sarah Palin... or something.


Every time the "Bernie's supporters are meanies" comes up, it just proves Queen Hillary ain't got nothing to offer. Her supporters are all in a tizzy because she didn't just slide into home plate without anyone pointing out her flaws.

Which is curious because she lost the last primary too.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
78. amen!!!!!!
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 11:56 AM
Jan 2016

In the last two weeks I have gone from supporting Hillary to sitting on the fence. Thank you Claire and Hillary and Chelsea.

raindaddy

(1,370 posts)
84. It's becoming obvious the the Democratic wing of the Democratic party has had enough!
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 12:55 PM
Jan 2016

No longer willing to be marginalized, counted on to support a corrupt a neoliberal agenda or be their scapegoat when the public grows tired of voting for candidates that are more interested in representing plutocrats than the poor and middle class...

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
85. Then you will get the president that you deserve
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 01:30 PM
Jan 2016

and will be laughed out of the room if you utter one complaint about something bad that President Trump or President Cruz did.

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
95. Going by the polls, that'll be the case if Hillary wins the nom
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 03:07 PM
Jan 2016

She barely equals those two, while Sanders easily defeats the entire pack.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
86. If she goes down that road, I won't be voting FOR her, I'll be voting AGAINST the Republican.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jan 2016

Which means she will still get my vote, but thats a sad state of affairs and I hope I don't have to feel that way come November.

Kermitt Gribble

(1,855 posts)
91. K&R
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 02:21 PM
Jan 2016

I've said that I'll have no problem voting for Hillary if she is the nominee. Her attacks on single payer are making me rethink that.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
93. Thank you for this courageous OP
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 02:38 PM
Jan 2016

Right on, brother.

Time and time again we have sat patiently while Rahm Emanuel calls us "retards" or Jon Cowan writes a position stating that there is no evidence that rank-and-file Democrats think the way we do. There seems to be plenty of evidence that we do and that evidence is the success of Bernie's campaign. How do you like that 800-pound gorilla, Mr. Cowan?

Apart from insulting the base of the party or brazenly lying about the base's existence or what the base thinks, Mayor Emanuel and Mr. Cowan are little more than Republicans who support gay rights and equal pay for women; they can even give lip service to Black Lives Matter, but Mayor Emanuel has absolutely no credibility when he does. They are fascists who think the party's rank-and-file should just get in line and vote for the Republican-lite candidate of their choice while they collect bribes generous campaign contributions from Wall Street donors for not sending Wall Street criminals to prison or keeping the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall off the table.

If it makes anyone happy, I will vote for Mrs. Clinton in the general election if she is the nominee of the party, although I may rethink that should she become the nominee through subterfuge after being rejected by primary voters. I will vote for her, but that will say less about what I think of her than it will say about what I think of Donald Trump or Ted Cruz or whatever clown is left standing in the GOP. I will vote for her, but I will not give her one minute of my time or one dime of my measly money, Make no mistake about it, I have no confidence in Hillary Clinton or any other neoliberal to be a good or even adequate leader for the American people.

I will vote her in November and then hit the streets starting in January to call for an end to poverty and income inequality, for renewable energy to supplement and eventually supplant fossil fuels, for civil disobedience to ISDS rulings and direct action against any corporate executive who even thinks out loud about taking a case to an unelected board of corporate shysters. We can start with Trans-Canada. I will hit the streets to call for the reinstatement of Glass-Steagall, the repealing of Gramm-Leach-Bliley and the jailing of Legs Dimon, Pretty Boy Lloyd and rest of the Wall Street criminals. I will hit the streets calling for single payer healthcare. I'll even be willing to call it (gasp!) socialized medicine. Why? Because socialism is no longer a dirty word, and we have today's crooked captains of industry and their corrupt stooges in the Republican Party or the Republican wing of the Democratic Party to thank for that.

I will hit the streets and call for democracy and an abrupt end to oligarchy. I will tolerate no nonsense about how the Founding Fathers, who owned slaves and suppressed the right to vote for the common man and all women, didn't want a democracy and thus created a mere republic. We are going to correct that serious flaw in their otherwise fine work.

I will hit the streets because though I may vote for Mrs. Clinton in November, I will not follow her off the cliff toward which every American president of both parties since Reagan has marched us. She clearly has no plans to change course from the road to that abyss.

Utopian Leftist

(534 posts)
98. + 1, well said!
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 03:19 PM
Jan 2016

The American public in general are quick to forgive and forget . . . on most things.

The American Left has still not forgotten the many ways a Clinton betrayed us. To quote the phrase that Shrubya so mangled, "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me." The point being that we were fooled by Bill Clinton. We are not going to be fooled by Hillary too (and they can keep Chelsea, as well, from what I've seen of her.)

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
101. I agree Segami. It would be a shame
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 03:35 PM
Jan 2016

if the leadership in the Democratic Party begins to sound like that slime ball Senator Joseph McCarthy.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
102. Hasn't been too bad so far.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 03:38 PM
Jan 2016

The only thing I have seen is the old, "Bernie can't win because he's a socialist." No direct comparisons to Joe Stalin. Just the implication that Republicans will attack him as such. Of course, they will attack Clinton the same way.

Scruffy1

(3,256 posts)
114. And I don't even consider Bernie a leftist.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 05:13 PM
Jan 2016

Through the power of MSM whole schools of serious political thought have been rendered non existent. I shudder what she would think of my anarchist-syndicalist friends. To me, she's just another ignorant bourgie with no respect for anyone whose ideas differ from her own. far as I'm concerned the whole power structure is a form of totaliarism, and anyone who wants to keep the status quo either likes being a slave or likes owning them. I put her in the second group.

reACTIONary

(5,770 posts)
125. So, we've gone from FDR to Eugene Debbs . ...
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:19 PM
Jan 2016

..... well at least it's honest and authentic . And a complete loss in the general election.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
126. More "I wont vote for HIllary in the GE" thread, while this should be RARE at DU
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:21 PM
Jan 2016

it is all day every day.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
127. David Brock was already at this a couple of months ago, and now the other employees are on it.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:22 PM
Jan 2016

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
128. I must be losing my hearing, but I could have sworn I just heard Chuckie Toad on MTP
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:23 PM
Jan 2016

declare that Hillary was the party of the past and Bernie was the party of the future. I don't know folks, what is going on?

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
131. hillary's self serving attacks on
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:35 PM
Jan 2016

bernie are really aimed at all of us - the voting public, unless you have money in your pocket to make her richer and put her on the throne she desires. all of her efforts to win over women and people of color and the working class is pure pandering and fake. if she gets her dream to come true she will only wield power for her personal interests and our causes will be thrown in the trash heap. dispicable.

mrsadm

(1,198 posts)
134. Thank you
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:54 PM
Jan 2016

For your brilliant post! I too often think I am completely alone...

I've admired Bernie for many years... and some personal experience, back when IBM was cheating its employees, he stood together with us at the company shareholder meeting. A man of great integrity.

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
136. wait for the the General Election if BS is the candidate. the GOP are masters of demonizing
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:46 PM
Jan 2016

opponenets!
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Dear Hillary: RED BAIT Pe...