2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Blames Bernie for an Old Clintonite Hustle, and That’s a Rotten Shame
Last edited Thu Jan 21, 2016, 02:59 AM - Edit history (1)
The Clintons have no shame, that much you can count on. That stupefying arrogance was on full display in the most recent presidential campaign debate when Hillary Clinton countered Bernie Sanders charge that she was compromised by her close ties to Goldman Sachs and other rapacious Wall Street interests with the retort: Sen. Sanders, youre the only one on this stage that voted to deregulate the financial markets in 2000, ... to make the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission no longer able to regulate swaps and derivatives, which were one of the main causes of the collapse in 08.
Hillary knows that the disastrous legislation, the Commodity Futures Modernization Act (CFMA), had nothing to do with Sanders and everything to do with then-President Bill Clinton, who devoted his presidency to sucking up to Wall Street. Clinton signed this bill into law as a lame-duck president, ensuring his wife would have massive Wall Street contributions for her Senate run.
...
Eight years later, when President Obama nominated Gensler to head the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, it was Sanders who put a temporary hold on the nomination, stating: Mr. Gensler worked with Sen. Phil Gramm and [former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman] Alan Greenspan to exempt credit default swaps from regulation, which led to the collapse of AIG and has resulted in the largest taxpayer bailout in U.S. history.
Today, Gensler is the top economic adviser to Hillary Clintons presidential campaign. And the CFMAkey legislation that was one of the main causes of the collapse in 08, enabling the great recessionis an enormous embarrassment that her husband on occasion reluctantly has conceded was drafted by his top aides and signed into law by him with great enthusiasm.
more...
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/01/19/hillary-blames-bernie-old-clintonite-hustle-and-thats-rotten-shame
----------------------------------------
Also, Hillary and O'Malley weren't in the senate at the time so it would have been an impossible feat for either of them to have voted on this bill. Very disingenuous for her to make that stateement to make it sound as if she had had the option to vote on it but chose not to. Also, only four people voted no on it. Rand Paul and three other House members. So is Hillary a "Paulbot" (as some DUers like to call anyone who ever agrees on Paul on even just one thing) now?
Why can't Hillary debate honestly? Why must she resort to dirty politics all the time? We know how badly she wants to be president, she's showing us with this campaign of desperation and lies.
EDITED TO ADD:
Garry Gensler: Gensler was the Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman in . Gensler is a former Goldman Sachs partner. He is currently Clinton's chief financial officer.
https://ballotpedia.org/Hillary_Clinton_presidential_campaign_key_staff_and_advisors,_2016
.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)And if she can't learn from history, she certainly shouldn't be president of the USA.
.
PatrickforO
(14,602 posts)disingenuous.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Jarqui
(10,131 posts)She has very flawed ethics and loyalty. Of late, the lies seem to be coming at us daily.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)She called attention to the fact that she is constantly trying to have it both ways. She claims she played an influential role in the success and prosperity of the 90s but thinks she should not shoulder any blame for what went wrong.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)No wonder they like each other so much.
.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)thesquanderer
(11,998 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)thesquanderer
(11,998 posts)Amazing what she tries to get away with.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)Yep
Duval
(4,280 posts)It is a shame and it is hurting the Democratic Party. Guess someone forgot about social media and how google works, not to mention fact check. I thought Hillary was smarter than this, but nooooo.
Thanks for the post and information, cui bono.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Also, Hillary and O'Malley weren't in the senate at the time so it would have been an impossible feat for either of them to have voted on this bill.
Bernie would never pull shit like this. Never!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)By "circles" I mean:
WillyT
(72,631 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)All she cares about is winning at any cost. She didn't learn from last time though, that her desperation tactics hurt her more than help her.
.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)We might have a better idea of where she really stands on "reigning-in Wall St".
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511041913