Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGood Read on Hilary vs Sanders by a Progressive Policy Wonk
https://medium.com/MichaelSLinden/the-four-policy-reasons-why-i-support-hillary-clinton-in-the-democratic-primary-71a3a7a0f3a7#.57f2yk4ik
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1320 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good Read on Hilary vs Sanders by a Progressive Policy Wonk (Original Post)
kennetha
Jan 2016
OP
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)1. Ah, the Orwellian-named "Progressive Policy Institute"
Official Wall Street-created think tank for the "New Democrat" coalition of Democratic party infiltrators.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)2. Is that all you got?
Got any actual arguments or just intellectually lazy ad hominems up your sleeve?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)7. Progressive Policy Institute? 'Nuff said.
No use bothering to read the propaganda unless you're the target audience.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)3. Ah yes, "defining the third way" Progressive Policy Institute.
Of course they support Hillary Clinton. Hardly an objective piece.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=6901
kennetha
(3,666 posts)4. There are arguments in this piece
Really well thought arguments. Would you like to address them? Or are you afraid to engage arguments that don't fit your pre-determined conclusions? Instead, you just prefer to dismiss the source.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)6. I know Hillary's proposed platform, and it's neither progressive nor aggressive.
There's nothing new in this editorial; my take-away - the author is trying to re-define the word progressive to fit Hillary Clinton.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)5. K & R, GOOD ARTICLE
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)8. Kick!