2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHas the press asked Clinton how she plans to pay for any of her promised stuff?
If she won't raise taxes, what is she cutting?
Stuff doesn't pay for itself....
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)while the other promises you a Toyota Prius, the person promising the Ferrari is going to be asked more questions about how he's gonna pay for it.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)here we go again!
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)hopemountain
(3,919 posts)it is a given. she is a warhawk. i really do not see her stance or penchant for supporting corporate interests changing.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)new wars in the Middle east, or new wars anywhere else
(not that if she did make that promise, it would be good for much).
Can a Bush-consorting foreign policy neoconservative war-hawk change her spots?
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/01/24/hillary-clinton-seeks-neocon-shelter
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/09/29/hillary-clintons-wicked-syrian-choice/
http://democracyjournal.org/magazine/35/countering-the-neocon-comeback/
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Or do you think a no-fly-zone is enforced by flying unicorns?
onecaliberal
(32,854 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)riversedge
(70,206 posts)should try it also. All her proposals are funded.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)riversedge
(70,206 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)riversedge
(70,206 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)riversedge
(70,206 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)A free kiss:
And an article from Nobel prize-winning economist Paul Krugman:
But heres the thing: we now have a clear view of Sanders positions on two crucial issues, financial reform and health care. And in both cases his positioning is disturbing not just because its politically unrealistic to imagine that we can get the kind of radical overhaul hes proposing, but also because he takes his own version of cheap shots. Not at people he really is a fundamentally decent guy but by going for easy slogans and punting when the going gets tough.
<...>
To be harsh but accurate: the Sanders health plan looks a little bit like a standard Republican tax-cut plan, which relies on fantasies about huge supply-side effects to make the numbers supposedly add up. Only a little bit: after all, this is a plan seeking to provide health care, not lavish windfalls on the rich and single-payer really does save money, whereas theres no evidence that tax cuts deliver growth. Still, its not the kind of brave truth-telling the Sanders campaign pitch might have led you to expect.
And look: if the political theory behind supporting Sanders is that the American people will vote for radical change if youre honest about whats involved, the campaigns evident unwillingness to fully confront the issues, its reliance on magic asterisks, very much weakens that claim.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/19/weakened-at-bernies/?smid=tw-nytimeskrugman&smtyp=cur&_r=1
Here's another kiss for good measure:
senz
(11,945 posts)And you can keep yer kissin' to yerself, kid.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Krugman esssentiallly calls out Sanders for his promise to give everyone free healthcare and pink unicorns.
Here's another kiss, darling:
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)riversedge
(70,206 posts)riversedge
(70,206 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)For example her student loan plan, as lame as it is, does not include specifics about funding.