2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHas Senator Sanders even bothered to inform the Senate that he has changed parties?
I know that he is saying that he is now a Democrat. But has he formally informed the Senate about this? He is still listed as an independent on roll call votes:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=2&vote=00005
His Senate seat is up for reelection in two years. If he doesn't get elected President, will he actually run for reelection as a Democrat?
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Other than Sanders Haters?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)incorrect. Sanders joined the Democratic Party having formerly been independent of party. He had no party. He joined one, but he did not 'change parties'.
What Party do you claim he was a member of?
This Party asked me to vote for many people who spewed opposition to my basic rights, all of then claimed to be Democrats, that includes Obama. Never voting in any primary for such a candidate again.
If Hillary wanted my vote this year, she should have thought of that at some point during her long years of opposing equality.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)out of convenience, I.e., to serve his political ambition.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)care about this crap. You do not speak for Democrats, you speak for yourself. Got anything to say about what I wrote, instead of some pitiful evasion of the discussion at hand?
OP: He changed Parties
DUer: Who cares?
You: Democrats care.
Me: So what Party do you claim he used to be in?
You: I never said that.
So. You agreed with the OP are you now going to openly reject the crapola that is this incorrect OP?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)What part of wasn't a Democrat; but, now identifies as such, I.e., changed party indentification, do you not understand?
-none
(1,884 posts)You know what Democrats used to be?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)That has included liberals, progressives, conservatives; but mostly, moderates.
It is only on DU, where "progressives" have been the loudest voices, despite their Democratic identity being recent and/or secondary to being "progressive".
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)But most Democrats I suspect do not care. They are more interested in policy than in labels.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Independents are the largest segment of the population and can vote in several open- and semi-open primaries all over the country.
I vote Democratic, but have never been a registered member of the party because I DON'T HAVE TO BE TO VOTE. I just ask for the Democratic ballot on primary election day and that's what I'm given.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)You know, those that put in the work for the Party.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I am not a HRC supporter before it sinks in?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)We'll likely hear something along the lines of "I didn't leave the party, the party left me, blah blah blah" ... gag me!
cali
(114,904 posts)brooklynite
(94,520 posts)Senate rules don't refect Parties, they reflect Caucuses. Sanders is still a member of the Democratic Caucus.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)NowSam
(1,252 posts)Do they not have smart phones and a million ways to get information? I know the main stream media ignored Bernie until recently but he is the king of Facebook. Seriously. That's why this race was wrapped up last summer. Bernie embraces the future while the rest are stuck in the past. Yeah, he's in the Betty White Zone. Look out, it's Bern time.
awake
(3,226 posts)"No we can't", "when the cameras are off the republicans say they will work with me", I will look out for wall street because they are my constancy (or something to that effect )
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)In the Senate, he is an Independent. Why would he change that status there?
He has consistently voted with other Democrats as a Senator. That's good enough for me.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)has always caucused with the Democrats so their is no change to record in terms of Senate records. None.
Second, to 'change Parties' requires two Parties, one which is left when the other is joined. Bernie previously was a member of no Party, he was not an member of the Independent Party he as independent of Party. So he joined the Democratic Party with which he already caucused, but he did not change parties. He joined one for the first time in his Congressional career when previously he had simply caucused with that same Party. 'Changed Parties'. No, he did no
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)his Senate seat, which is what I said.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Sanders 'changed parties' from when he became a Democrat?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)One can say she changed views because first she had one set of stated views then rejected them. Then she took up new views, she changed her views on civil rights.
Bernie having always Caucused with the Democrats and never having been a member of another Party in the Congress, has not 'changed Parties' by formerly joining the Party with which he caucuses and always has caucuses.
Care to comment on that?
Another one: Hillary was in favor of war with Iraq because of WMD. Later she said she was wrong and she has changed her views. She was for it, now against it. Changed views, from one view to another.
What was his former Party? You say he 'changed Parties' so what Party did he change from? It cant be that you are using false smears against a Democratic candidate on DU, can it?
daybranch
(1,309 posts)Is this another start of Bernie is dishonest etc? Pitiful start, unlikely to go far.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Has he? Has he?!