2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMartin O’Malley encourages his backers to support Bernie Sanders
In the closing two comments of Martin OMalleys appearance on the latest Democratic Town Hall event, Martin OMalley, not so inconspicuously, urged his Iowa contingent to back Bernie Sanders if they do not reach the 15% needed in the deranged caucus format to cast a vote for OMalley. Specifically he said, Americas looking for a new leader
We can not be this fed up with our gridlocked dysfunctional national politics and think that a resort to old ideologies or old names (ie. Clinton) (BTW this is why we should infer that when OMalley uses new later in his responses that he is excluding Hillary Clinton) is going to lead us forward
America needs new leadership and I need the OMalley supporters out there on caucus night to hold strong and move forward like Iowa does. Forward is not referring the status quo and old ideologies attached to the Clinton name. He continues during his next and final question with his implied support of Sanders by saying, Time and time again in the history of the state of Iowa, Iowa has found a way to sort the the noise and sort through the national polls and lift up a new leader for our country
That is what you did eight years ago when you lifted up Barrack Obama (over Clinton) to lead our country forward and we need to build upon his good work and continue to move forward
Im not here to praise you Iowa, Im here to challenge you. Lift up a new leader. Because you can change the course of this presidential race. (From Clinton to Sanders) You can shift this dynamic on caucus night
There is nothing so divided about our national politics that it can not be healed with a renewed faith in each other and new leadership
But I think it important, in order to move our country forward, that once again Iowa lift up a new leader
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/1/25/1475230/-Martin-O-Malley-encourages-his-backers-to-support-Bernie-Sanders
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)telling them that they could change the course of the presidential race from Clinton and Sanders (both of whom are old names) to O'Malley.
Nice try, though.
elleng
(130,895 posts)Not a 'nice try,' but thanks for being 'nice,' Empowerer.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)...."help" MOM fans out yall.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)"BTW this is why we should infer" = I'm lying.
Lorien
(31,935 posts)You can complain to them there if you like.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Do you stand by it?
99Forever
(14,524 posts)What sort of person would the gall to post a politcal opinion about a Democratic primary on a political forum specifically about the Democratic primaries?
The nerve of 'em.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Just like most things posted here.
That you don't happen to agree with it doesn't make it a lie.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)That makes it a lie. Most respondents in this thread agree that it's a lie.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)....arbitor of truth?
I missed that memo.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)So fucking ask away.
Another nice bucket of fail.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)Face Palm. Daily Kos is the one lying not the member
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511070484#post56
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511070484#post58
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511070484#post50
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511070484#post49
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511070484#post47
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511070484#post42
And there's plenty more
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)your wrong by claiming the poster is lying , the poster shouldn't be guilty via accociation or we'll be talking about the weather underground again
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)I didn't claim the poster was lying. I claim that the subject line of the post is a lie and most respondents agree. There is no guilt by association.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Obsess much?
It's long past time for something alright.
Bub bye.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)So that makes you just as guilty of spreading BS as Daily Kos.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)or doesn't understand plain speaking.
O'Malley could not have been more clear. He encouraged his supporters to back Martin O'Malley.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)That's what makes it so obviously wrong.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)and that was certainly a significant aspect of it.
riversedge
(70,204 posts)TacoD
(581 posts)On Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:25 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Your post is an outright lie
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1070533
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Directly calling the OP a liar isn't acceptable, and happens too much. This poster does it twice in one post without confronting why he thinks so, and continues the attack in the thread.
This is the kind of person who drags down the discourse at DU.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jan 26, 2016, 03:32 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Warranted in this instance.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Yes, the poster doesn't seem to understand that really really REALLY disagreeing with someone else's opinion does not make it a "lie," nor does he or she even deign to discuss the point beyond screaming about it. That's not discussion. HIDE.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Poster needs to find a way to disagree without calling others "Liar!". Pretty basic stuff. I'm tired of it.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Word choice may not be optimal discourse, but seems to be saying the same thing as other responses in the thread. Do we remove them all? Also seems to be pointing out the post is a lie, not the person posting it. Again, others are saying the same thing.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Response to Renew Deal (Reply #4)
Post removed
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)resident of Baltimore, I ask that you please apply your efforts attending to the horrific damage you did to Baltimore City during your tenure. It is desperately needed there.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)He was talking about those going to the caucus to think hard about a "mew leader", and that would be him. He was not promoting his supporters to go for anyone else. This is why I have such a hard time with Bernie's supporters, they seem to like to throw out BS like this and make claims that are not real. Posting stuff like this sheds a bad light on Bernie, not to mention those who are posting this crap.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)It's greed
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Are bigger than a candidate's supporters ...
You see ONE person making this claim, and suddenly, ALL Bernie supporters are stark raving lunatics?
Sayonara ...
FSogol
(45,481 posts)so it isn't just one person being dishonest.
Number23
(24,544 posts)elleng
(130,895 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)Sadly the "radical" ones who spread this shit are the more vocal of his supporters. I think that there are "real" supporters for Bernie who won't sink to post out right BS, and there those more "radical" ones who post any crap they can no matter if it's true or not, and no matter where it might come from, including right wind sites.
I can say that whether you want to believe it or not, what supporters say and do make a difference in how people view the actual candidate. I like Bernie, but he has some very questionable supporters, and members of his team who don't seem to real care about how they make him look by saying the things they say. Constantly bashing the other candidates to make your candidate look good does not work.
synergie
(1,901 posts)make that rather clear in how they smear liberals, progressives and actual Democrats with right wing talking points.
The problem is that people are so infected by primary hysteria that they will believe whatever sounds good to them, and don't bother with checking their facts.
There needs to be push back from actual Bernie supporters when inanity like this is posted, but so many either just roll their eyes and move on, or they've stopped participating because of the sheer toxicity. Many other are having their worst fears reinforced with the online echo chamber and truly believe the conspiracy theories and the media is trying very hard to inflame the matter in their desire to have more things to cover. Remember that the biggest complaint over the past few months has been how boring the Democratic primaries are, and then the dirty tricks and the "anonymous Democrat" started making the rounds and catering to the persecutory delusions and the conspiracy theories.
A lot of these guys aren't people who are really on his team, they are just terrified of facing his opponent in a General, and firing up the hate and manipulating supporters is an excellent way to get the opponent they want.
Sadly, there really isn't much Bernie can do about it, but his campaign does seem to be taking advantage of it, citing it as "passion" and "enthusiasm", though most of is not pro-Bernie, just anti-Clinton. I'm not sure many even pay that much attention to Martin, whose candidacy actually has been facing the things that the Bernie supporters claim on Bernie's behalf. (The blackout for instance, where Bernie himself and his surrogates were all over the media, including the hosts, while Martin is barely covered at all.)
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 26, 2016, 04:25 PM - Edit history (1)
Our education system sucks. The author of this piece simply can't comprehend what he is reading. Now they have left it up to us to attempt to comprehend their writing.
Suggestion: Get the reading part down first.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...this is tripe.
FSogol
(45,481 posts)That so many gullible Sanders supporters (8 recs so far) want to believe it really says something.
elleng
(130,895 posts)The writer's inference is INCORRECT. The New Leadership Governor O'Malley refers to is HIMSELF.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)as for instance the 2nd Amendment, HOWEVER
what I heard from him was:Keep voting for me,
and don't give up!
And as the most energetic speaker last night, I
think he was spot on there. You don't give
up while running for the office before even
one vote has been counted.
Just me speaking now:That question should not
have been allowed, because it was rude.
elleng
(130,895 posts)Don't Give Up!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)elleng
(130,895 posts)"Weve been running a true Iowa campaign so far. We have held more than 170 events, I have stood on more than 170 chairs, and I have taken my jacket off more than 170 times before answering questions from caucus goers across the state.
"Our country is moving to a more connected and compassionate place. We need to move beyond these divided times. I have the experience of doing just that. Over my 15 years of executive experience, I worked with members of both parties to move my state forward and get things done.
"We need a new leader to do the same thing in Washington, and to build on President Obamas accomplishments.
"As I told my supporters in Iowa, hold strong, and lift me up as a new leader."
Martin OMalley
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I do not think that his message was "go ahead and switch to Bernie." I think he literally means to stick with it and try to represent as best they can.
I personally think that if individual caucuses don't have enough O'Malley support that some of the language in there might, MIGHT, be more suggestive towards Bernie over Hillary. But that is only by a matter of slight degrees.
But again, overall his message was 'stick with me, stay strong, hold out!'
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)to generate support for their candidate. And these are the people who call Clinton liars.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Chelsea jogging around the WTC on 9/11? Being named after Sir Edmund Hillary? and the list goes on.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)When he clearly did? Promising to overturn citizens united as soon as he's elected? Claiming poverty is at its highest rate in US history when in fact it isn't? And then denying he has voted with the gun lobby, when his votes are a matter of public record. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/bernie-s/
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/13/politics/democratic-debate-fact-check/
https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/27110/bernie-sanders/37/guns
By all means, you worry about how she described her many trips to Bosnia and Afghanistan. I care about policy.
(We could talk about the photoshopped photos released by his campaign, but as I said, I care more about issues).
Number23
(24,544 posts)Frenchie referred to this yesterday. What is this about?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Or to "hold out."
I don't think you can claim that that means "back Bernie."
However, I do think that someone could read between the lines and determine that it might mean to favor Bernie over Hillary if, in some caucuses they don't get to viability,
one_voice
(20,043 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)Faux pas
(14,672 posts)Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)1. He's campaigning for himself.
2. If and when he withdraws, he'll throw his support behind Hillary Clinton
This is just grasping at straws, wishful thinking, and dreaming.
PS - if he WASN'T talking about himself, how do we know he wasn't talking about Donald Trump?
retrowire
(10,345 posts)I denounce this thread. Bad form. Bad bad form. O'Malley is strong and in it to win it. It likely won't happen but, this is a cheap attempt to steal his supporters. Bad bad bad...
navarth
(5,927 posts)I didn't get that from Gov. O'Malley at all.
But to me the big story is that fuckwit Cuomo asking him such a fucked up question.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)will break Hillary's back in Iowa!
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Mass
(27,315 posts)The new leader he was speaking about was himself.
George II
(67,782 posts)....(perish the thought) talking about himself? That writer was disingenuous by throwing in those ( )s.
Amazing the projection and speculation that goes on during a campaign.
MuseRider
(34,107 posts)I can see how it could be construed to mean that but I am pretty certain he was just wanting people to come out in enough numbers for him to be able to compete there.
He is still in this to win and he should be allowed to continue, not that you OP inferred he not continue.
kecpdx
(6 posts)n/t
elleng
(130,895 posts)as it is NOT TRUE, the writer mis-inferred (to put it mildly.) Governor O'Malley's position is THIS, for your information:
"Hold strong. "That is the message I told my supporters in Iowa tonight.
"Weve been running a true Iowa campaign so far. We have held more than 170 events, I have stood on more than 170 chairs, and I have taken my jacket off more than 170 times before answering questions from caucus goers across the state.
"Our country is moving to a more connected and compassionate place. We need to move beyond these divided times. I have the experience of doing just that. Over my 15 years of executive experience, I worked with members of both parties to move my state forward and get things done.
"We need a new leader to do the same thing in Washington, and to build on President Obamas accomplishments.
"As I told my supporters in Iowa, hold strong, and lift me up as a new leader."
Martin OMalley
Politicub
(12,165 posts)O'Malley certainly did not say this. Sanders is getting strong support. There's no need to resort to lies or "inferences".
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)He encouraged his backers to support Martin O'Malley for President.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Yet it has 66 at the moment. Doesn't say much for those who would rec a pure bullshit lie.
JI7
(89,248 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)because O'Malley clearly didn't say that last night. He encouraged his supporters to vote for O'Malley. You'll see that in the rest of this thread JI7, in the comments by those of us who watched the debate.
JI7
(89,248 posts)FSogol
(45,481 posts)about himself. This thread and it recs are very disappointing.
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Koinos
(2,792 posts)O'Malley supporters are amazingly civilized in the face of outrageous attacks and innuendos made against their candidate. They are good principled folk with a lot of heart who still believe that their candidate stands heads and shoulders above the others. I am getting Sanders fatigue from Daily Kos and certain Bernie "supporters," who are clueless when it comes to knowing how to appeal to supporters of other candidates. Martin O'Malley won't stand aside, and neither will we.
Lorien, delete this thread NOW. I will also let Daily Kos know how I feel about this crap. They ought to know better.
Honestly, do any Bernie supporters really believe it is wise to alienate O'Malley supporters in this primary and in the coming general election? That would be politically insane.
So get rid of this awful thread. And let's all let Daily Kos know what we think of this sort of tripe.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)They try for any cheap shot "victory" they can get at any non Sanders supporters expense and they don't understand why that's not a good idea.
Peacetrain
(22,875 posts)to stay strong at caucus..
Political_Junkie
(1,998 posts)I thought it was a dig at Socialism.
BlueMTexpat
(15,368 posts)actually said. He wants his supporters to support HIM. Period.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)keenly emblematic of the behavior of Sanders supporters.
O'Malley supporters, I'm sorry you have to be on the receiving end of it this time but you can see what it would be like if Sanders supporters viewed your candidate as a threat. This is just a small sample.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)But I sure won't rec it. This is just plain stupid to post shit like this and make the claims that have been made. This poster should have deleted this like a long time ago. This is the kind of thing that makes Bernie look bad because of something dumb his followers do.