Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:09 PM Jan 2016

Stealing data, racial profiling, and now impersonating union members.

Last edited Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:07 PM - Edit history (1)

Followers getting so out of hand that a campaign spokesman needs to tell them to be respectful.
Dismissing Planned Parenthood as "establishment."

This the "revolution" we're supposed to sign up for? Ugly.

On edit -- using AARP's logo without permission, too? Is this thing totally out of control?

71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stealing data, racial profiling, and now impersonating union members. (Original Post) DanTex Jan 2016 OP
If this is the "revolution" we'll be getting, I want no part of it. nt Cali_Democrat Jan 2016 #1
Well, Hillary was on the board of Walmart, right? kristopher Jan 2016 #36
Agreed Gothmog Jan 2016 #50
I thought I might reply but changed my mind. mmonk Jan 2016 #2
Bullshit! Human101948 Jan 2016 #3
Well, not the question that was asked. But it does reveal more than was probably intended. NurseJackie Jan 2016 #5
Meow! Human101948 Jan 2016 #37
Wait JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #4
Here is the link to the Union story. revmclaren Jan 2016 #6
Oh JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #10
Its being covered on most of the major news outlets now... revmclaren Jan 2016 #8
Bob Marley is on right now JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #12
understand completely. revmclaren Jan 2016 #21
Found the racial profiling thing JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #22
My issue is with the Union trespass... revmclaren Jan 2016 #27
"The Union trespass"? Yeah, keep those agitators away from the workers!!!! kristopher Jan 2016 #38
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #41
Yes, it is the same bullpuckey every day/week/month/year from the HRC campaign kristopher Jan 2016 #44
It was a blown opportunity for Bernie, could have let them do their protest and he could randys1 Jan 2016 #33
On what, your mind? I want me some Marley randys1 Jan 2016 #31
Here's the racial profiling story: Cali_Democrat Jan 2016 #23
I found it on city data JustAnotherGen Jan 2016 #25
Thanks for the link. Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #43
Wow, so much flailing about farleftlib Jan 2016 #7
Are you one who doesnt pile on when some bashing of Hillary takes place? randys1 Jan 2016 #34
That's it for you RobertEarl Jan 2016 #9
Love it when you can't refute DanTex redstateblues Jan 2016 #54
Not worth the time RobertEarl Jan 2016 #56
Its only Thursday angrychair Jan 2016 #11
I'm not sure about the raining of frogs Nanjeanne Jan 2016 #14
Spaghetti on meatloaf night? Oh noes!!1! Know what comes after that? farleftlib Jan 2016 #16
kick Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #13
It's clear you aren't signing up...spare us the faux outrage. Punkingal Jan 2016 #15
Well, if he wins the primary (which is looking pretty unlikely) he's my guy. DanTex Jan 2016 #17
It's the PP one that gets me. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #18
I suppose in conspiracy world it isn't possible the staffers were wearing union pins in solidarity. Vinca Jan 2016 #19
The union doesn't seem to think so. DanTex Jan 2016 #20
You mean the union BOSSES don't seem to think so. Vinca Jan 2016 #24
The were caught in restricted areas of the hotels - areas for employees ONLY. As for the.... George II Jan 2016 #65
And as for the person making the initial complaint - Vinca Jan 2016 #67
So that means that they didn't access restricted areas reserved only for employees? George II Jan 2016 #68
Oooooh . . . what a crime. Have you ever wandered into "restricted" areas? I have. Vinca Jan 2016 #69
I haven't dressed up and gone into a restricted area willfully. You're now saying.... George II Jan 2016 #70
You make it sound like they crept into a nuclear storage facility. Get a grip. Vinca Jan 2016 #71
throwing spaghetti against the wall again?? grasswire Jan 2016 #26
Facts. Some people don't like them. DanTex Jan 2016 #29
I don't think that's spaghetti they're throwing Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #47
I have no idea what you're referring to with any of this. And I suspect most don't either. reformist2 Jan 2016 #28
Read up. Or maybe it's easier not to. DanTex Jan 2016 #30
Most of your posts are cryptic. Nt Logical Jan 2016 #52
Ha ha. you made me chuckle at your "I know nothing" riversedge Jan 2016 #32
My God. The horror. Bonobo Jan 2016 #35
I don't how they manage to go on. morningfog Jan 2016 #48
Taking Monsanto money, banksters money and now fracking lobbyist money. jillan Jan 2016 #39
Deflection. So how do you feel about the actions of Bernie's campaign? DanTex Jan 2016 #40
I don't buy into everything in your list yet. morningfog Jan 2016 #46
The nasty campaign stuff is alway OK when it's redstateblues Jan 2016 #55
Or for Hillary. See 2008 and her repeat with hitman Brock. morningfog Jan 2016 #57
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #60
Sounds just like a Gang of bullies to me! William769 Jan 2016 #42
The sort of bullying I most strongly object to is that whole 'Defense of Marriage' DOMA mindset: Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #63
Things get ugly during this part of the primary. American elections are ugly, ugly, ugly. morningfog Jan 2016 #45
These complaints need to be investigated Gothmog Jan 2016 #49
Dan being Dan, LOL! nt Logical Jan 2016 #51
Yes, Dan, your bullshit is totally out of control. But it is good that you asked. HERVEPA Jan 2016 #53
Any specific refutation? Or just an ad hominem attack redstateblues Jan 2016 #58
Posts the same bullshit with different words over and over. HERVEPA Jan 2016 #61
So Bernie had permission? treestar Jan 2016 #64
Lol, the inevitable flailing and lashing out that accompanies panic whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #59
The actions of an ambitious politician. nt LexVegas Jan 2016 #62
And still Hillary is losing supporters to Bernie. aikoaiko Jan 2016 #66

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
36. Well, Hillary was on the board of Walmart, right?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:01 PM
Jan 2016

I guess that's where the idea of using union busting rhetoric is coming from...

"Those damned agitators are sneaking in to get the workers all agitated and all that damned communist stuff!!!"

You guys really need to run with this. It is great.

JustAnotherGen

(31,818 posts)
22. Found the racial profiling thing
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jan 2016

Im an O'Malley supporter so take this at face value - positive intent . . .

I don't blame Senator Sanders for that.

I don't think he would have liked that at all.

http://www.citypages.com/news/racial-profiling-alleged-at-bernie-sanders-rally-in-st-paul-8000955

revmclaren

(2,520 posts)
27. My issue is with the Union trespass...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:51 PM
Jan 2016

Being a Union member, this leaves a very bad taste in my mouth. Waiting to see how this develops, but not good!

Response to kristopher (Reply #38)

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
44. Yes, it is the same bullpuckey every day/week/month/year from the HRC campaign
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:30 AM
Jan 2016
So that Culinary Union story...

Where the Bernie staff was sneaking into places and trying to convince union workers to support Sanders.

Odd story.

What's even odder is that the only source seems to be the union. And particularly the head of the Union Geoconda Arguello Kline.

I'm sure it would be purely a coincidence that she's "randomly" campaigned with Hillary?



That's her on the left.

http://m.lasvegassun.com/news/2015/oct/12/clinton-joins-union-protest-at-trump-hotel-in-las/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511085341

randys1

(16,286 posts)
33. It was a blown opportunity for Bernie, could have let them do their protest and he could
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:57 PM
Jan 2016

show how he supports.

Given he doesnt need anymore white middle class voters in the primary, if you get my drift

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
7. Wow, so much flailing about
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:23 PM
Jan 2016

and the screaming meemies on top of that. Take some aspirin or something.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
9. That's it for you
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:30 PM
Jan 2016

You are on ignore... and good riddance Dan.

You seem to hate Democrats and don't want poor folks to have health care so ignore you go.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
56. Not worth the time
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:14 AM
Jan 2016

Look at the title of of the OP. Nothing but pure trash, Dumping it so I never see any such trash again. You're probably next.

angrychair

(8,698 posts)
11. Its only Thursday
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:30 PM
Jan 2016

By Sunday we will have stories that choosing Sanders will make gawd block out the sun and slay 10,000 newborns and bring plagues of locust and rain frogs or even worse, spaghetti on meatloaf night.

Nanjeanne

(4,959 posts)
14. I'm not sure about the raining of frogs
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:33 PM
Jan 2016

I do think the weather report said because of Sanders by Monday it's raining Meatballs . . . and Meatballs 2.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
17. Well, if he wins the primary (which is looking pretty unlikely) he's my guy.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:36 PM
Jan 2016

I sure hopes he finds a way to put an end to this stuff. Part of being a leader is making sure your followers don't behave like jackasses.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
18. It's the PP one that gets me.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:36 PM
Jan 2016

He is running against the establishment. He knows his supporters are anti-establishment. He calls the a part of the establishment.

As far as the union one, I hope Clintons surrogates made it back home unnoticed.

The recent racial profiling. Has it been confirmed that POC were removed who weren't with the protesting group? While it wasn't handled well, I have no problem with known protestors being removed.

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
19. I suppose in conspiracy world it isn't possible the staffers were wearing union pins in solidarity.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jan 2016

Assuming this came from HuffPo, you neglected the other article about how Bernie and Elizabeth Warren just saved taxpayers $18 billion. Doesn't fit the narrative, I guess.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
20. The union doesn't seem to think so.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:40 PM
Jan 2016

Also, I wasn't aware that I was supposed to comb all of HuffPo and report on every article there. Is that in the DU rules?

George II

(67,782 posts)
65. The were caught in restricted areas of the hotels - areas for employees ONLY. As for the....
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:49 PM
Jan 2016

....$18 billion? Actually it was Senators Blumenthal (CT) and Markey (MA) who initiated that, not Sanders or Warren. Three or four other Senators were involved, too. It's all in the Huffington Post article.

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
67. And as for the person making the initial complaint -
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:33 PM
Jan 2016

it turns out that not only is she a union leader, she's a Hillary supporter so close to the candidate they've appeared in a photo together.

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
69. Oooooh . . . what a crime. Have you ever wandered into "restricted" areas? I have.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:43 PM
Jan 2016

Get out a little. If Hillary's supporters are too timid to go into a "restricted" area, that doesn't say much for the courage of the candidate.

George II

(67,782 posts)
70. I haven't dressed up and gone into a restricted area willfully. You're now saying....
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 05:37 PM
Jan 2016

....that they "wandered" into the employee-only lunch rooms of FOUR separate hotels, hinting that it wasn't intentional?

I'd like to see them try that at an airport.

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
71. You make it sound like they crept into a nuclear storage facility. Get a grip.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 06:18 PM
Jan 2016

Here I thought they'd gone into a workplace, but now you're telling me the lunchroom. Wow. What a BFD that is.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
28. I have no idea what you're referring to with any of this. And I suspect most don't either.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:53 PM
Jan 2016

I do detect a lame attempt to smear someone, but it's not going to work. In fact, you're making things worse for your side.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
35. My God. The horror.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:59 PM
Jan 2016

If I were you, I would take a stiff drink and curl up in bed and hope this insanity blows over.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
48. I don't how they manage to go on.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:44 AM
Jan 2016

It's like nothing I've ever seen other than every four years.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
39. Taking Monsanto money, banksters money and now fracking lobbyist money.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:53 PM
Jan 2016

I expect she will cry again the night before the NH primary.

Thanks, but no thanks.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
46. I don't buy into everything in your list yet.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:42 AM
Jan 2016

I'm withholding judgment on the AARP mailer until more proof is produced.

However, even if everything is proven (which likely won't happen), I feel the campaign workers are ambitious.

Response to DanTex (Reply #40)

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
63. The sort of bullying I most strongly object to is that whole 'Defense of Marriage' DOMA mindset:
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 10:19 AM
Jan 2016

"I believe marriage is not just a bond but a sacred bond between a man and a woman. I have had occasion in my life to defend marriage, to stand up for marriage, to believe in the hard work and challenge of marriage. So I take umbrage at anyone who might suggest that those of us who worry about amending the Constitution are less committed to the sanctity of marriage, or to the fundamental bedrock principle that it exists between a man and a woman, going back into the midst of history as one of the founding, foundational institutions of history and humanity and civilization, and that its primary, principal role during those millennia has been the raising and socializing of children for the society into which they are to become adults."
And

"Every State reserves the right to refuse to recognize a marriage performed in another State if that marriage would violate the State's public policy. Indeed, the Supreme Court has long held that no State can be forced to recognize any marriage. That is what the case law has held. But just to make sure there were no loopholes in that case law, the Congress passed and the President signed the Defense of Marriage Act, known as DOMA.

The Defense of Marriage Act has not even been challenged at the Federal level, and because the Supreme Court has historically held that States do not have to recognize laws of other States that offend their public policy, it is assumed that any challenge would be futile."
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4535174/hillary-clinton-gay-marriage-2004

Not only bullying but also very wrong about DOMA was not open to challenge.....don't even try it, we made a law!!!!

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
45. Things get ugly during this part of the primary. American elections are ugly, ugly, ugly.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:39 AM
Jan 2016

And this one will get far uglier from both sides. Sit back and enjoy the show.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
64. So Bernie had permission?
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 11:07 AM
Jan 2016

to use the AARP logo?

That was in the news. It's not something Dan made up.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
66. And still Hillary is losing supporters to Bernie.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:56 PM
Jan 2016

Even if Bernie's campaign did make these errors, more and more Democrats are choosing Bernie.

I'm not saying everything you said is true but some have said so.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Stealing data, racial pro...