Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton LCV rating 82%, Bernie 95% (Original Post) Bread and Circus Jan 2016 OP
So, they both have great scores. We'd be lucky to have either as the nominee. BUT the LCV believes Metric System Jan 2016 #1
Stuff it. Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #2
Have I been berned? Is that what this is? You're not very civil. Metric System Jan 2016 #4
Look in the mirror. morningfog Jan 2016 #34
I don't recall telling anyone to "stuff it." Metric System Jan 2016 #37
And the LCV endorsed Hillary? Things are rotting at the top everywhere. Broward Jan 2016 #3
They seem to be rotting at the bottom as people throw tantrums when they don't synergie Jan 2016 #8
Was that a confession? Broward Jan 2016 #12
Well THAT'S totally irrelevant. floriduck Jan 2016 #5
He didn't earn the endorsment, I know you're upset, but do you think synergie Jan 2016 #6
I am sorry can you rewrite your post so it makes sense? Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #7
Sorry, I don't speak whatever language you apparently do, but synergie Jan 2016 #9
hmmm... GummyBearz Jan 2016 #16
pointing out that Bernie has a much higher LCV rating than Clinton is pouting? Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #18
"you seem to be pouting about your candidate not supporting your candidate"? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #21
Funny how she understood the one with the typo, but not the one in plain Enlgish. synergie Jan 2016 #23
plain Enlgish? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #27
You definitely like to dish out insults. Metric System Jan 2016 #10
I just like well written posts that I can at least understand. Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #13
It was a well written post, and literate readers shouldn't have problems synergie Jan 2016 #26
Wow, you don't quit... Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #30
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #31
There you go dear, I erased that letter that seems to have upset you so. synergie Jan 2016 #33
When you don't have a legitimate argument to make, you have to synergie Jan 2016 #35
So why does he have to steal their logo? DanTex Jan 2016 #11
hmmm.... why does Hillary's logo point to the right? Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #14
That's a great comparison. Perfect. You really understand. Excellent. DanTex Jan 2016 #15
Every time you respond is a nice fat bump to remind people Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #20
LOL. This is going to turn the primaries. DanTex Jan 2016 #22
All I can do is laugh at you. Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #24
... DanTex Jan 2016 #25
Proceed, governor. Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #28
And yet failed to earn the endorsement, but went ahead and lied about it synergie Jan 2016 #36
I think Sanders supporters talked about that ad nauseam months ago. Metric System Jan 2016 #17
Some did yes... but I also remember the usual suspects saying logos don't matter... Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #19
Yet more deflection of the dishonesty, and yes the logos really bothered Bernie synergie Jan 2016 #29
BLM!!! Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #32
Why did Hillary steal hers? Fumesucker Jan 2016 #38
Busted! LOL. DanTex Jan 2016 #39
Haha.... lol Bread and Circus Jan 2016 #40

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
1. So, they both have great scores. We'd be lucky to have either as the nominee. BUT the LCV believes
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:13 PM
Jan 2016

Hillary is more likely to get things done.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
8. They seem to be rotting at the bottom as people throw tantrums when they don't
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:19 PM
Jan 2016

get their way and engage in online 'backlashes' that embarrass their campaign and their candidate.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
5. Well THAT'S totally irrelevant.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:15 PM
Jan 2016

It doesn't fit the Fox/WaPo/MSNBC/NYTimes/CNN etc watchers readers feed bags.

Bern on!

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
6. He didn't earn the endorsment, I know you're upset, but do you think
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:17 PM
Jan 2016

acting out like you're doing substitutes for a legitimate argument or changes things?

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
9. Sorry, I don't speak whatever language you apparently do, but
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:21 PM
Jan 2016

you seem to be pouting that LCV is not supporting your candidate. How do you think throwing a tantrum changes the fact that your candidate did not win the endorsement?

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
16. hmmm...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:27 PM
Jan 2016

"you seem to be pouting about your candidate not supporting your candidate"

I am sorry can you rewrite your post so it makes sense?

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
18. pointing out that Bernie has a much higher LCV rating than Clinton is pouting?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:28 PM
Jan 2016

I am sorry... do you not like facts?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
21. "you seem to be pouting about your candidate not supporting your candidate"?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:34 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:43 AM - Edit history (1)

What does that mean?

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
13. I just like well written posts that I can at least understand.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:25 PM
Jan 2016

Read the post I commented on. It doesn't make any sense to any discerning reader. It is D- High School writing for Pete's sake.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
26. It was a well written post, and literate readers shouldn't have problems
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:40 PM
Jan 2016

with complex sentences, but you picked up on the one with the typo well enough, which speaks to the level of D- high school reading that's going on.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
30. Wow, you don't quit...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:44 PM
Jan 2016

I gotta give you an A for effort.

But an F for editing.

One would think you would start to be more careful with your errors.... but you just don't quit.

Rock on, mate

Response to Bread and Circus (Reply #30)

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
35. When you don't have a legitimate argument to make, you have to
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:49 PM
Jan 2016

go for the silly stuff. Whining about how an organization chooses to endorse when they don't choose your candidate doesn't allow for much intelligent argument, so it must be the typos.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
14. hmmm.... why does Hillary's logo point to the right?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:26 PM
Jan 2016

I mean, since logos are now the cause of such outrage!

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
20. Every time you respond is a nice fat bump to remind people
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:32 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie has a much better LCV rating than Clinton.

Proceed, governor.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
36. And yet failed to earn the endorsement, but went ahead and lied about it
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:51 PM
Jan 2016

on their literature anyway. Please, Bread, proceed to demonstrate why LCV and all those other organizations chose the best candidate.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
19. Some did yes... but I also remember the usual suspects saying logos don't matter...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:30 PM
Jan 2016

But now apparently they do....because...reasons.

Actual voting records be damned.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
29. Yet more deflection of the dishonesty, and yes the logos really bothered Bernie
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:41 PM
Jan 2016

enough to attack wiki, didn't they? Sooooooooooooooooo much outrage! You guys are hilarious with all these tantrums!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton LCV ratin...