2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary's most influential supporters hate Bernie Sanders
<snip>
Some Hillary Clinton backers say Sanders is so unpalatable they would look for another option in the unlikely event that he emerged as the Democratic nominee including former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. | AP <snip
Now, as she makes her final argument, Clinton faces a dilemma. She is appealing to an electorate thats clearly energized by Sanders populist rhetoric. But hes not just any populist. Hes a self-proclaimed Democratic socialist calling for a political revolution to overthrow the billion-aihs, as Sanders refers to them in his thick Brooklyn accent. That puts him in direct conflict with the big money donors funding her campaign -- the very targets of Sanders wrath and theyre beginning to voice their frustration over the emergence of a viable challenger spouting such radical ideas.
Bernie Sanders is a fringe candidate, said Eleni Kounalakis, a major Clinton donor who served as ambassador to Hungary during Clintons time as Secretary of State. Not just because he is advocating for policies that are pie in the sky and impractical, but also because he has no proven ability to advance these fringe strategies. Hes been in Congress for decades and hasnt been able to advance any of his fairly radical ideas.
Kounalakis, who hosted Clinton at her San Francisco home for a $2,700-a-head fundraiser last November, said that Sanders could very well come out of Iowa and New Hampshire looking like a viable candidate. But in terms of leading the country? Hes simply too radical and his ideas are just fiction.
Some Clinton backers say Sanders is so unpalatable they would look for another option in the unlikely event that he emerged as the Democratic nominee including former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
[Michael] Bloomberg was a transformational mayor, Doug Band, Teneo president and longtime top adviser to Bill Clinton told POLITICO. I have incredible respect for him as a leader, visionary and philanthropist. Band said a scenario in which Sanders and Bloomberg, running as an independent, are up against a Republican like Ted Cruz or Donald Trump isnt going to happen. But hypothetically speaking, if it did, its not even close -- I would choose Bloomberg, as would so many others.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/hillary-clinton-43-percent-problem-218405#ixzz3yej81lFj
DanTex
(20,709 posts)What's going on there?
cali
(114,904 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)as vehement. You think Bernie's buddies sit around and sing Clinton's praises?
cali
(114,904 posts)not just on Hillary, but on the Democratic Party and our government
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Even the last guy, who said he would go for Bloomberg instead. OK, so he's a centrist. Yeah, such people exist.
For the most part, it sounds like they don't think Bernie can win, and they're right.
Honestly, you don't think that Bernie's insiders say and think nasty things about Hillary all the time? You think the people who consider her a shill DINO corporatist whatever are just on the internet, but his insiders are totally different than that?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)does he make a sound?" Not in Extremistland. I understand the impulse to cry out now and then anyway, though.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,686 posts)lest we become deluded into thinking we can achieve a tiny slice of their big fat pie.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)while the text talks about dumping their girl. Amazing.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)We hear the same "too liberal" crap every election.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It is all about selfishness.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Of those to whom much is given, much more is required...and some of them don't like that prospect one bit.
cali
(114,904 posts)He used to say that.
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)Aphrodisiac. Love of money for "me, myself & I" will replace the need for many other human pleasures. However, it can also BUY whatever their "little" hearts desire!
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)...documents promise. Some would have the billionaires keeping all their money in the Caymans and letting every downtrodden soul in this country continue to suffer and leave every dream unfulfilled.
historylovr
(1,557 posts)Now just drop dead and decrease the surplus population.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Lochloosa
(16,064 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Before voting for Bernie? OH The HORROR the SHOCK
NOT
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)didn't used to be that way.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)good luck winning a billionaire campaign in this environment,
i look forward to bloombergs ass handed to him by bernie
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Democrats are not on board for that kind of power shift.....they're ideologically opposed.
Not all of them, but enough. Should Bernie win, only then will we
learn who has the best interests of the country when who
supports him or not. We have a pretty good idea now who
will oppose his policies, but it will be more clear later, is what
I mean.
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)will vote for Bloomberg over Sanders.
The Clintons and their staffers are not on the side of the 99%. We can't afford a Clinton nomination.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)is music to my ears!
WIN, Bernie, WIN!
randome
(34,845 posts)Clinton has spent years making connections with them and uniting them on her side, whereas Sanders -an Independent- jumped in at the last minute and thinks he can make it do what he wants.
He hasn't taken the time (that we know of, anyways) to get to know the people whose party he just crashed.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]