2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum538: "What if Sanders loses Iowa? It’s probably over."
None of that would necessarily matter. Iowa should be one of the half-dozen or so most favorable states in the country for Sanders; New Hampshire is one of the few that ranks even higher for him. If Sanders cant win Iowa, he probably wont be winning other relatively favorable states like Wisconsin, much less more challenging ones like Ohio and Florida. His ceiling wouldnt be high enough to win the nomination unless something major4 changes.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-happens-if-bernie-sanders-wins-iowa/
Monday is do or die for the Sanders campaign.
Health Wagon
(99 posts)Monday at 11:59pm CT.
ErisDiscordia
(443 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)Jarqui
(10,123 posts)If he wins NH (likely) and comes close in Iowa, I say he pulls ahead in WI
Romulox
(25,960 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)how Iowa will sugar off, but this is just the beginning for this movement, or rather it's the rebirth of what Occupy sparked. Bernie and his supporters have breathed new life into it.
And when Bernie returns to the Senate, he will be one of its most powerful members.
When he speaks, millions will be listening and responding.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)elected to the Senate and House? It seems to me that's where things really need to change to get Washington to change. As it stands right now, Americans are sending mostly moderate Dems to extreme conservatives to Washington to represent them.
cali
(114,904 posts)they're working on it. It's impressive. They are so disciplined over there it blows my mind.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Because electing Sanders isn't enough. He needs friends, even in seats that are currently occupied by Democrats.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)Beating Clinton would open people's minds to the idea that real change is possible and we don't have to settle for someone who seems so concerned about whether the GOP congress likes their ideas.
Free some minds and the votes will follow.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)....McCain would have been out in 2008 and Romney would have been out in 2012.
Let's let the people of Iowa decide.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)He is saying that the map gets difficult for Bernie after NH. The opposite was true for McCain.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)....but he and others never thought that Sanders or Trump would do as well as they have. On that front they have been wrong. I have no idea how it will all shake out and I look forward to going back and seeing who was the most accurate.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)They make predictions based on existing polling information. So based on the November 2015 polls, Hillary had a 75% chance. Based on January 2016 polls, she might have a 55% chance. That's the number they should be judged on. This is how Rasmussen ends up being so accurate. The post BS for months at a time and put out an accurate last poll.
ErisDiscordia
(443 posts)It's the realization that the technology has advanced, and you haven't, and it's destroying your mighty empire...see also: Data General, DEC, and a lot more.
Health Wagon
(99 posts)Ask him about his prediction with the Canada, UK elections and the Scottish referendum. He failed, miserably.
ram2008
(1,238 posts)We'll see
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)The Democratic Party can say goodby to legions of younger voters. It will become the party of geriatric conservatives.