2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders Aide Apologizes To Clinton Staffer For Bernie Bros’ Trolling
Bernie Sanders campaign is trying to rein in his unruly online men. Live by the Redditors, die by the Redditors.
...the social web has also shown off the worst of Sanders supporters. Writing in her endorsement of Clinton this week, progressive writer Joan Walsh complained of harassment from online supporters of Sanders that the Vermont Senators campaign aides have been aware of for months. Walsh called them the Berniebot keyboard warriors, but theyre more commonly referred to as The Bernie Bros.
In fact, top Sanders campaign aides have quietly reached out to senior officials in the Clinton campaign and women like Walsh personally to apologize for Bro behavior. Online, aides are pushing their digital community to police itself and keep the Bros quiet. And some volunteer members of Sanderss digital army are scrambling into action, reporting offenders and moderating bro-y posts.
Still, the Bros break through, and theres real worry in corners of Sanders-world about it.
On Thursday, the BBC catalogued social media attacks on black pundits and women who opine on Bernie. Mashable posted a ton of screenshots of Bro attacks Friday morning.
An example, in the comments under a photo of New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen and Clinton: Their vaginas are making terrible choices! wrote a Sanders supporter. The New Yorkers Emily Nussbaum recently complained of being called a psycho and a bitch on Twitter after saying something positive about Clinton.
A lot of the Bernie Bro activity is short of that kind of open harassment, and is more shouty explaining, or smug mansplaining. It is, though, a style of discourse thats anathema to the progressive, feminist quarters of the internet that share many of Sanders policy views....
MUCH more at link: http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/the-bernie-bros#.gbJPBJ79bb
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)K & R
I bet Clinton never apologizes for her people making the rest of us hate the H campaign, but they should.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)this is what you have left to kvetch about. Nonsense that means squat in the bigger scheme of things.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)You are kvetching at the Bernie handlers.
The rest of us are agreeing with what they are finally admitting. Bernie bros have become a liability to growing the revolution.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)We get why you're pushing this pathetic meme. It's right in line with the type of toxic campaign Hillary and her supporters resort to. But it only resonates with her bitterest of supporters and doesn't amount to a hill of beans with everyone else.
I've read the comments you're complaining about. They are almost exclusively strsightforward expressions of a difference of opinion, something you guys simply cannot accept. Plus the anonymity of the internet flies in the face of the certainty you cling to in this matter. Your complaints simply don't hold water.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Article after media article describing the nasty, name calling, threatening swarming. I honestly believe it has been the handicap that has hurt his overall campaign and contributed to his stagnant numbers.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Too bad you find that so threatening that you have to resort to this childishness. And FTR, Bernie's got the enthusiasm. He's got the momentum. And that's precisely what's got your knickers in a twist. Transparent as f@ck.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Especially the past few days. They are on a smearing rampage.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)One of your own left in the HRC group.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)shouldn't clickbait rags also be equally condemned? Or is that only when it's the E$tabli$hment $ain't is in the crosshairs?
MADem
(135,425 posts)Funny, that. Anyone remember him? He met a rather sad end.
This article was written by their White House correspondent.
They do fluff, and they do stuff.
Like a lot of online entities.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)All one needs to do is look at DU to see that Hillary supporters can be quite nasty as well.
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)BainsBane
(53,031 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)and I don't see Clinton supporters censoring anyone by abusing the alert system.
Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)The attacks on the daughters of Joan Walsh and Cecille Richards is beyond the pale.
sheshe2
(83,749 posts)tonedevil
(3,022 posts)to demonstrate how to address someone without name calling. The terms Berniebot and Bernie Bro are certainly used in the most respectful way possible.
frylock
(34,825 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)So we're supposed to be respectful of online bullies now?
No, I don't think so.
frylock
(34,825 posts)hopemountain
(3,919 posts)bots. these attacks are typical of immature individuals who could care less about endorsing any candidate but who do their best to insult and offend others beyond the pale. in return, they win the praise of their sick peers and have cases of socks drop shipped to their basements for the number of disgusting insults they can send to anyone. everyone is a target.
personally, i have great respect for joan walsh - one of the few integral journalists of our time and it is hideous what she has endured.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Breaking news
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)says volumes.
And it is harassment and bullying.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)I don't like internet bullying but there is plenty to go around no matter what you are discussing, especially politically.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)These things just get weird and confusing.
George II
(67,782 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Still, I have to wonder what took him so long. How about toward PP, NARAL, Sybrina Fulton, Elon James White, Ta' Nehisi Coates, Al Franken, Jane Goodall, and today even the pollster PPP!
(plus many, many more).
Nyan
(1,192 posts)for implying that he's sexist?
I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that. Because why would I expect a smidgen of decency from them?
George II
(67,782 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)And obviously Sanders recognizes that there is a problem--what he needs to do is address it--he probably could use a little more gender diversity in his inner circle:
In an interview on MSNBC Thursday, Sanders said some of the statements from his campaign were inappropriate ... clearly, I have a lot of respect for Secretary Clinton.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-sexism-bernie-sanders-215375#ixzz3yhpW7e00
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Clinton was attacking him personally for being sexist, not his staff.
Btw his inner circle has Symone Sanders and Nine Turner.
MADem
(135,425 posts)There's only one woman in that club, and that's his wife. Oddly enough, even though she has said that she is a key player on the staff in several interviews, she is not named as an adviser or campaign manager in this listing. She must not be drawing a salary for her work. http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/256523-jane-omeara-sanders-future-first-lady
All his listed "key" staff (see link below) are male. Symone Sanders is in the "other" staff category. Turner is just an endorsing supporter, not on staff or serving in an advisory capacity, AFAIK.
https://ballotpedia.org/Bernie_Sanders_presidential_campaign_key_staff_and_advisors,_2016#Key_staff_and_advisors
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I would counter one of your points by saying that during the times she did work for Sanders she was lambasted right here by DU members who said that her drawing a salary was unethical (even though technically her compensation would be determined an arms-length negotiation for her salary).
Jane Sanders just can't win around here.
MADem
(135,425 posts)she is not listed as a key advisor, though she has self-identified in that manner.
The 'salary' business had to do with taking a fee for negotiating media buys for the Senate campaign, IIRC, not serving as a regular campaign advisor. She probably would have been on surer footing if she did the latter, but I believe she was working at the college at the time.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Its still early days, but the worrying tribalism that tore the Democratic party apart in the 2008 election is beginning to rear its ugly head. Supporters of Clinton and Sanders have been lobbing bombs at each other over social media as their campaigns ramp up, and the rhetoric is getting nastier and nastier.
For the love of God, if you are doing this, please stop.
Hardcore supporters of both candidates are becoming equally annoying in their unyielding devotion that consists primarily of irritating hashtags on Facebook posts, and photo memes that may or may not be accurately sourced. (snip) So if this is you, please, stop being a dick and voice your support without resorting to childish name calling. (snip) It is simply not worth it in the long run, even if you are a hard core Berner or a Hilldawg fanatic.
http://thedailybanter.com/2015/08/hey-bernie-and-hillary-supporters-stop-being-dicks-to-each-other/
I find is quite amusing that Bernie supporters can see it coming from both sides, but Hillary supporters refuse to see it coming from them. They are good, Bernie supporters are bad.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)They don't even really say Hillary has better ideas, to the contrary. Most of them even say Bernie's ideas are better, but he isn't as electable, congress won't pass anything he wants, or we need to have a woman president. Or some variations on those themes. Not very many seem to be on board with Hillary's platform they are team Hillary and that is that no matter what she is actually proposing.
MADem
(135,425 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I've looked at clouds from both sides now.
I really don't know clouds at all.
But now it's just another show
you leave 'em laughing when you go
and if you care
don't let them know
don't give yourself away.
I've looked at life from both sides now
from win and lose and still somehow
it's life's illusions I recall
I really don't know life at all
I've looked at hate from both sides now.
From win and lose and still somehow,
It's hate's illusions I recall,
I really don't like hate at all.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The criticism is valid.
It has to do with the age of the supporters who are flinging the shit to no small extent, but it's not an even-handed exchange at all.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)there are a lot more Bernie supporters than their are Hillary supporters. You can't help but see it more often.
MADem
(135,425 posts)At their jobs, living their lives, etc....maybe not. Surely not.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)But it's only the ones on the internet and social media who are tossing the hate around so strong...and some of that carries over to protests in public.
How long after the nominee before these wounds heal, if ever? This feels like the town of Burns to me.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Of course, IF a Democrat does indeed win in November, it will only be a matter of months before this place reads like Free Republic in opposition to that candidate, whosoever s/he may be.
Look at what a brief honeymoon Obama enjoyed here--he'd barely unpacked before a cadre of Lefter Than Thous started carping about what he hadn't done, how he'd compromised on this or that, or why he wasn't ruling by decree like some sort of dictator. The expectations that some have from a President are sometimes unrelated to the actual duties of a POTUS IAW the Constitution...
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I love the man and think he's been one of our greatest Presidents. There has been a lot of unfair criticism leveled at him. But he did run on a more progressive platform than he actually used once in office, so I can understand the frustration for many progressives who thought that is what they were getting.
And there are a lot of people who are not realistic in understanding how politics is done, and what power a President actually has.
However, I have a pretty good eye for integrity, and Obama and Bernie both rate very very high in the honesty, integrity and compassion categories for me.
I wish I could include Hillary in that, but I've not seen that in her. She is not a horrible person as many here try to make her, and some of the attacks on her are right out of the republican play book. So I do really understand the frustration and anger of a lot of Hillary supporters who have to deal with that.
If you've paid any attention to my posts, I've defended her often on attacks that have no merit or are superficial and made out to be catastrophic. Just like many of the attacks on Bernie now.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)TSIAS
(14,689 posts)The Clinton side has David Brock heading up its smear operations, with two sites started by DU'ers who do nothing but trash Sanders' supporters. I don't see John Podesta or anyone apologizing for them.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)they don't have to be practical in any way at any time. They worship an ideologue so they can always be right in their own minds because there is no practical history to criticize. This lets their superiority complexes run amok. They have more than earned their nasty reputations.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)away sometimes but based on the stuff we are seeing lately to think that all of these posters are Bernie supporters is crazy.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)A fitting epitaph.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Hillary never apologizes just minimizes her wrong doings as little mistakes like that IWR vote.
frylock
(34,825 posts)The comment Their vaginas are making terrible choices! was more than likely made by a woman! I see comments like that all time on FB.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)but far, FAR worse.
Social media wasn't as fully developed back then.
And Dean supporters may have been young and enthusiastic but no where near as obnoxious or sanctimonious.
I'm also going to chalk it up to Dean being an actual Democrat with actual Democrats around him.
People won't want to be associated with a bunch of ideologues.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)not the right to healthcare and social security.
It's totally obnoxious to suggest otherwise.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)The internet fuels their ability to shut down anyone wjo challenges their ideas.