Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NAO

(3,425 posts)
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 03:07 PM Feb 2012

Is there any substantive opposition research on Santorum?

I "know" he is bat-shit crazy. But he does NOT consider his crazy utterances as gaffes, and apparently NEITHER does the Republican base.

Do you think Obama is prepared to run against Santorum? Has the DNC put together anything? Anybody have links to opposition research that is more informed than merely saying "he will scare independents", etc?

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Joe Bacon

(5,165 posts)
13. Here's a start!
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 08:05 PM
Feb 2012

From The Skeleton Closet:

http://www.realchange.org/santorum.htm

One of the 3 Most Corrupt Senators

Santorum is one of the most corrupt politicians in recent memory, by which I mean, he repeatedly sponsored laws giving very specific help to companies -- worth millions of dollars -- and they immediately gave him large campaign donations and -- after he left the Senate -- hundreds of thousands, and millions of dollars in cash that went directly into his pocket and made him rich. He was twice named one of America's 3 most corrupt senators by CREW, a clean-government group, and has become a millionaire from payments by these companies since was voted out of the Senate in 2006.
For example, Santorum bragged in 2006 that he had steered millions of dollars in earmarks to clients of American Continental Group, a lobbying firm. They gave him $14,000 that year in donations, and after he left office paid him $65,000 for “legislative policy consulting services.” Another firm he helped, Consol Energy, paid him $142,500 just in 2010 and 2011.

But that's nothing compared to what he got from Universal Health Service, a medical company with facilities in Puerto Rico that has been sued for Medicare fraud. You see, while in Congress, Santorum kept pushing very specific laws increasing Medicare payments in Puerto Rico; one would have cost the government $400 million. (The eventual bill gave them more money, but not that much.)

That seems like an odd cause for a small-government Senator from Pennsylvania to work so hard on -- until you find out Universal Health Service paid Santorum $395,000 for his "insights" after he left the Senate, and appointed him to their Board of Directors. During his time on the Board, UHS was sued for Medicare fraud (and settled out of court), and several of their facilities had their certifications suspended or cancelled.

Santorum, who entered the Senate as one of the least wealthy congresspeople, bought a $2 million, 5,000 SF house in Great Falls, VA in 2007. It has 4 bedrooms and 5 baths, and sits on 5 acres, and goes well with the 5 rental houses he has accumulated since entering Congress.

While in the Senate, Santorum held weekly meetings supporting Tom Delay's "K-Street Project," an effort to fill lobbying groups with Republican loyalists. And they rewarded him handsomely, even back then. In 2006, he received $500,000 from lobbyists, far more than any other federal candidate -- 40% more than the #2 recipient, George Allen.

It's true that CREW -- the group that named him one of the 3 most corrupt senators, out of 100 -- is a liberal-leaning group. Only five of their 25 corrupt congresscritters in 2006 were Democrats -- but they have pretty good credibility on the people they include. (Who they leave out may be a different story.) Their reports, which come out every year, are meticulously documented with solid media sources, ethics investigation reports and required government filings by the congresspeople themselves. They only picked 3 Senators out of 100, and Santorum was one of them. Most of the Congresspeople convicted of bribery or other ethical crimes since then -- such as Democrat William Jefferson, and Republicans Bob Ney and Duke Cunningham - were listed first in these reports. They're pretty solid.

Now, unlike Jefferson and Cunningham, no one is accusing Santorum of direct bribery -- no one found bundles of cash in his freezer -- but he had a remarkably consistent pattern of collecting money from big special interests right at the time he did them big, highly specific favors. We're not talking about generic actions like voting to keep taxes low. These are very detailed provisions, added to bills by Santorum, that put millions of dollars in the coffers of these companies.

One dramatic example was Santorum introducing a bill that required the National Weather Service to keep collecting weather data, but said they couldn't release it to the public! They had to hand it to private weather companies who then would make the profit off of it. Guess what? Accuweather, a private weather company in Santorum's state, gave him tens of thousands of dollars right during the time he promoted this absurd bill.

There are many more examples -- $25,000 from execs at Waste Management & Processes, Inc. after Santorum proposed a $100 million subsidy for their coal-to-diesel plant; $6,000 from Miller and Annheuser-Busch right before Santorum introduced a bill cutting the beer barrel excise tax in half; $20,000 from tobacco interests around the time he blocked a law allowing the FDA to regulate tobacco, etc. etc. It's pretty shameless even by Congressional standards.


 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
2. are you kidding
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 03:23 PM
Feb 2012

this freak would be even easier to beat then perry or bachman. I think the republican base, except for a very slim percentage on the extreme lunatic fringe also consider him to be bat shit crazy.

but don't get your hopes up. I'm still convinced it's going to be Romney.

NAO

(3,425 posts)
3. He has won more states than any other candidate;
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 03:40 PM
Feb 2012

the base are embracing him as the anti-romney, and they believe he is a "True Conservative";

further the evangelical pastor council held in TX choose him above all others as their preferred candidate;

and now the entire RCC bishop and priest, in every Mass in the United States is telling their congregants that Obama is "immoral", "evil", "an enemy of religion" and part of the "culture of death".

every evangelical pastor is telling people that the "abortion pill mandate" is part of Obama's "war on religion";

The CPAC people love him; ppp has him polling above Romney and Gingrich.

They may consider him "crazy" but they have been telling themselves that nothing could be worse than Obama; they were willing to embrace ANY candidate who could "beat Obama", even Mitt whom they hate.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
7. How many delegates did his 'wins' amount to?
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 04:46 PM
Feb 2012

I thought that the states he won were the just-for-show states. I wonder if maybe they felt safe in those states to vote for him knowing that their votes didn't really count. Also, in all three states that he won, turnout was miserable. Santorum is in the exact same position Gingrich was in a month ago. A month ago everybody was saying that Gingrich was the man to beat and the chosen Non-Romney. Today it is Santorum. Actually, I just read that Paul is winning Maine with Santorum in a distant third, so today maybe the chosen Non-Romney is Paul.

God, it has to suck to be Mitt Romney and watch the party that he has cut backflips to fit into desperately trying to find somebody, ANYBODY other than him to nominate.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
4. Now that he is in the "spotlight"
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 03:43 PM
Feb 2012

I expect that the "establishment" GOP and MSM will begin putting out his "greatest hits" any day now-Terri Schiavo, comparing homosexuality to bestiality, proclaiming that we had found WMDs in Iraq, claiming that Obama is leading religious conservatives to the guillotine, billing taxpayers for his cyber-schooling, etc. There's plenty of material to work with and he's anything but mainstream.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
14. The longer that Mitt has to wait for his eventual coronation
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 01:39 AM
Feb 2012

the better for us.

Any thoughts about whether or not Mitt might seriously consider asking Santorum about being his veep? Anybody wondering if he isn't thinking about offering him the job? If the social regressives accept the deal and Santorum drops out of the race for POTUS, Romney's path to the coronation......er......nomination would be clear and the regressives would probably be more supportive of him. Santorum doesn't have Newt's massive ego and would probably be o.k. with a VP slot. He has to realize that his "surge" may not last long.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
6. I dont think there is much. If there is its not killer stuff like we have on Romney or Gingrich.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 04:33 PM
Feb 2012

This guy is "squeaky" clean for a GOP politician. People here who dismiss him as a lunatic see him through our lens as liberals. The low information ignorant masses will just see him as a clean-cut good-looking guy with a nice family and is very religious. I think he could be harder to beat than Romney.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
10. The only real weakness he's got
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 06:10 PM
Feb 2012

in the eyes of the Republicons, anyway, is that shenanigans he pulled by having a school district in Pennsylvania pay for some sort of home-schooling scam while his family members were probably technically residents of Virginia. Tea partiers don't like to see any kind of government spending they consider wasteful, and this looks that way.

The vast majority of the GOP base either doesn't have any problems with, or actually lauds him for his stands on freedom for gay people and other culture war issues. They may be a problem for him in the general, but he's got to win the nomination first before he addresses those issues with independent voters.

NAO

(3,425 posts)
11. that's EXACTLY my concern
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 07:20 PM
Feb 2012

he's squeaky clean and his followers don't consider his crazy utterances gaffes - they consider them to be honest, principled statements.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
8. Outside of his batshit crazy positions
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 04:48 PM
Feb 2012

there is the whole tax issue, where he was claiming a 2 bedroom house with no furniture or curtains as his "primary residence" for tax purposes. Said empty house was outside of Pittsburgh. Santorum family was living large in Virginia.

If anyone has oppo research, it would be Bob Casey. He beat Santorum a few years ago by like 19 points or something and kicked him out of his Senate seat.

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
9. Muriel Volestrangler posted a link to a New Republic piece on Santorum's record as a lobbyist
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 05:17 PM
Feb 2012
The Sordid K Street Past of Rick Santorum

Since losing his Pennsylvania Senate seat in 2006, Santorum has used his connections to land a series of highly-paid jobs. Consol Energy, a natural gas company specializing in “hydrofracking” and the fifth-largest donor to his 2006 campaign, paid him $142,000 for consulting work. He also earned $395,000 sitting on the board of Universal Health Services (UHS), a for-profit hospital chain whose CEO made contributions to his Senate campaigns and which stood to benefit from a big hike in Medicare payments Santorum proposed in 2003. (Incidentally, the Department of Justice sued UHS for Medicare and Medicaid fraud during Santorum’s four-year tenure on its board.) Santorum also earned paychecks from a religious advocacy group, a lobbying firm, and a think tank. For pushing legislation benefitting UHS and several other companies, one ethics group named Santorum to its “most corrupt Senators” list.

Santorum has made his post-Senate career doing the sort of quasi-lobbying that helped sink Newt Gingrich’s campaign in Iowa. But in fact, while still in office, he was a central actor in an even more sordid venture: The K Street Project. Started in 1989 by GOP strategist Grover Norquist and brought to prominence by former House majority leader Tom DeLay in 1995, the K Street Project was a highly organized effort to funnel Republican Congressional staffers into jobs at lobbying firms, trade organizations, and corporations, while attempting to block Democrats from those same posts. From 2001 until 2006, Santorum was the Project’s point man for the Senate, while House Majority Whip Roy Blunt manned the House side.


I doubt the M$M will cover this. People here seem to think that Santorum will be easy to beat; but, he's done enough favors for the Powers That Be to assure that they are willing to spend big money to (s)elect him.

NAO

(3,425 posts)
12. Santorum is a Fracker? As in injecting fluids at high pressure
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 07:29 PM
Feb 2012

to rupture things "underground"?

The process that results in a " frothy mix of lube and waste matter that is sometimes the byproduct" of the struggle to expel gas and oil?

Talk about "unnatural acts" done against nature!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is there any substantive ...