2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBill Clinton throws Obama under the bus
'But in talking about the struggles of middle- and lower-class America, Clinton was met with silence when he said President Barack Obama wasn't a "change-maker" like Hillary. He clarified a few sentences later that Obama has had accomplishments, including the Affordable Care Act.
"Yeah, it's rigged," he said, speaking of the financial system, "because you don't have a president who's a change-maker, who has a Congress who will work with him. But the president has done a better job than he has gotten credit for."'
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/government/bill-clinton-makes-memphis-stop-for-wifes-campaign-2b822367-7dc6-3729-e053-0100007f0adf-368546981.html?d=mobile
So he agrees that the financial system is rigged - the people funding his wife's campaign are crooks - but thinks Obama isn't a change maker. But his wife who is using the same people in her campaign as Obama and Bill - like the Podesta brothers - she's a big change maker.
Based on what exactly?
Not based on trying to be like a souped up version of Sanders I'd hope. Lol.
More transparent nonsense from the Clintons.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Claims she want to continue where he leaves off. If that's the case, I suspect she's not a change maker either. But that's exactly what the 3rd way-ers want.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Your hypocrisy is showing again. Oh my!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1216680
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is abusive and only meant as an attack on the poster. Why do we allow this? There is no reason to show up with the sole purpose of lobbing insults and adding nothing to the discussion. We have ignore. People need to use it if they do not like someone. Please hide
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:40 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I thought I had seen the thinnest of skind in '08. Looks like '16 is gonna put that race to shame.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I don't see any hint of hypocrisy - obviously this poster based this inappropriate personal attack on past history. Better ways to address this than here.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts).
A McCain/Palin presidency!
.
cali
(114,904 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)earthshine
(1,642 posts)Wig Master
(95 posts)Just my 2¢!
Jarqui
(10,128 posts)and got done in the government?
We went through this before here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511172520#post58
She's not a proven "change-maker". Never was.
Wig Master
(95 posts)That's... something.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)OZi
(155 posts)I made change. ALL HAIL ME, CHANGE-MAKER!
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Man, now THAT was a body blow.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)knr