Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 03:00 PM Feb 2016

Bernie Sanders in 1995: A Brutal Assessment of Bill Clinton’s First 2 Years as President

Consistency is generally one of Bernie's strong points as a candidate, and much of his criticism of the current liberal establishment is the same now as it was decades ago. What it important to keep in mind is that many of the same issues he is attempting to address now are problems that were exacerbated massively during Bill Clinton's administration, and that this happened as a result of policies that Hillary Clinton worked tirelessly to promote.

From In These Times:
Written in January 1995, this never-before-published-online article by then-Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) assesses the first two years of Bill Clinton's presidency, taking Clinton to task for not pushing hard enough for progressive goals including raising the minimum wage and economic stimulus spending. Sanders explains why, under Clinton, there was “virtually no organized and effective opposition to the American ruling class,” and criticizes the former president for his focus on welfare reform, crime and free trade as ways to “placate corporate America.”

First, serious progressives have no reason to be “disillusioned” with Bill Clinton, or to accuse him of “selling out.” Bill Clinton is a moderate Democrat, a founder of the conservative force within the Democratic Party known as the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC). As governor of Arkansas, and during his campaign for president, he made no secret of the fact that “welfare reform,” “crime” and “free trade” were major tenets of his program.

Has Clinton been a better president than Reagan or Bush? Yes. Have his policies begun to seriously address the enormous problems facing our nation? No. Has he tried to build a political movement that would empower working people so they could make real improvements in their lives? Absolutely not.

Clinton and his party depend on corporate money and the support of wealthy donors, so it shouldn't surprise us that he would want to placate corporate America with NAFTA, GATT and special trade status for China. We should not be surprised that the president has refused to lead the effort for real campaign finance reform. And we should not be surprised that his health care initiative, which finally placed the American health care crisis at the top of the national agenda, was in fact developed and supported by the largest health insurance companies in the country.

If you read the full article (and I encourage you to do so), you will see that Bernie also sets forth a number of key policy proposals that he felt progressives needed to get behind. See if these seem familiar:

"We need to raise the minimum wage."

"The president should push for a serious economic stimulus/jobs program, progressively funded, to put Americans back to work rebuilding the physical and human infrastructure of our country."

"The administration must engage in a total rethinking of our disastrous trade policy, which has cost us millions of decent-paying manufacturing jobs"

"It's well past time to press Congress for significant decreases in military spending."

"Sweeping changes in labor law are desperately needed. Workers who wish to join unions must be allowed to do so."

"Progressive tax reform is also urgently required."

Full article here: http://inthesetimes.com/article/bernie-sanders-president-bill-clinton-1995
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders in 1995: A Brutal Assessment of Bill Clinton’s First 2 Years as President (Original Post) Mufaddal Feb 2016 OP
Well said, Bernie! djean111 Feb 2016 #1
ABSOLUTE CONSISTENCY! CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #13
So he has a history of back seat driving? CorkySt.Clair Feb 2016 #2
He has a history of serving in Congress under feckless executives. nt TheLogicalSong Feb 2016 #3
He does what a Senator is supposed to do. Propose laws. jwirr Feb 2016 #5
Troll harder Mufaddal Feb 2016 #6
If the drivers had paid attention, they wouldn't have driven us off the cliff. nt Zorra Feb 2016 #8
Yup. And he's finally angling for the front seat. (n/t) thesquanderer Feb 2016 #19
Bernie correct in 1995 and still correct today Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #4
I have no problem with measured, factual criticism. Qutzupalotl Feb 2016 #7
how much succesful legislation has he authored in the past 20 years to address these issues DrDan Feb 2016 #9
I guess a fairer question would be: how much has either candidate Mufaddal Feb 2016 #11
except the OP addressed BS's criticisms re WJC's presidency DrDan Feb 2016 #12
I think you should have a look at NWCorona Feb 2016 #16
no - I think bills he authored are what I would like to hear about - not DrDan Feb 2016 #18
Of course you'd say that. NWCorona Feb 2016 #20
he raised the issues - he was a member of congress - what did he do about them? DrDan Feb 2016 #21
Again, if you look at the amendments you might find an answer NWCorona Feb 2016 #22
so others took the initiative . . . got it DrDan Feb 2016 #23
Thanks. The more you learn about Bernie, the more you like him. nt kristopher Feb 2016 #10
Spot-on! AzDar Feb 2016 #14
If the Democrats hadn't adapted, Bush Sr. would have been reelected. Beacool Feb 2016 #15
So war on the poor = "adapting"? Mufaddal Feb 2016 #17

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
13. ABSOLUTE CONSISTENCY!
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:27 PM
Feb 2016

In contrast to Clinton Incorporated...

Still could use some "Transparency" from them... Mika has some inside information on those nasty transcripts...

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
5. He does what a Senator is supposed to do. Propose laws.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 03:58 PM
Feb 2016

I think it is significant that he saw what most of us did not see until we had already voted him in. That is how I see Bill Clinton and his wife today.

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
11. I guess a fairer question would be: how much has either candidate
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:25 PM
Feb 2016

To which I would point you to this great new website.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
12. except the OP addressed BS's criticisms re WJC's presidency
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:27 PM
Feb 2016

so to ask what HE did is appropriate

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
18. no - I think bills he authored are what I would like to hear about - not
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:37 PM
Feb 2016

someone else's legislation

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
21. he raised the issues - he was a member of congress - what did he do about them?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:48 PM
Feb 2016

seems to be a fair question.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
15. If the Democrats hadn't adapted, Bush Sr. would have been reelected.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:31 PM
Feb 2016

After Carter's presidency, decent man as he may be, the Democratic brand was damaged. Tough for some like Sanders to swallow, but it's the truth nonetheless.

Easy to criticize Bill and Obama when you are not president. Gays in the military and the push to pass his healthcare plan, cost the Democrats Congress. The ACA cost Democrats Congress too. Should either men have shirked their duties to the country? No, they went ahead with what they believed to be the right thing to do. For their efforts they, and their party, were punished by an angry electorate. It's easy for Sanders to always be the thorn on the side when he was safely ensconced in the House and then the Senate.

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
17. So war on the poor = "adapting"?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:34 PM
Feb 2016

The alternative reading of this seems to be, "The only way to avoid Bush Sr was to become Bush Sr."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders in 1995: A...