Seriously

[angrychair]

With all do respect. Be reasonable.
This is the equivalent of standing on the train tracks and seeing an oncoming train light and thinking "it won't hit me" despite all logic to the contrary.

She says we have nothing to worry about, that it's the same old thing :
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/24/hillary-clinton-urges-voters-not-worry-about-email/

Doesn't seem that way:

http://news.yahoo.com/spy-agencies-clinton-emails-closely-matched-top-secret-213108714.html

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/02/loretta-lynch-hillary-clinton-email-prosecution-219733

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/270592-lynch-promises-independent-review-of-clinton-case

Then there is this:
http://nypost.com/2016/02/15/is-america-already-back-in-clinton-scandal-fatigue/

At some point It really does have to be #NotMeUs
I don't want the nightmare scenario, if, she wins the nomination and is in the GE and she is called before a grand jury about a SoS staffer or foundation staffer or one of them is called in about Clinton. It is going to happen. It is not a matter of if but when. This is not a bunch of blowhard partisans on some random House or Senate committee. If you really care about a Democrat in office, you will give this the serious consideration it honestly deserves.

[leftofcool]

1. Here is my serious attention to this non issue......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[angrychair]

6. This is not a non-issue???

I have given you substantive proof that this is a non-partisan, executive and judicial branch driven investigation, that is not going away. What is your proof it is a non-issue, besides ranting about teapublican conspiracies, which do not apply in this context.

[angrychair]

11. Good drive by

Good discussion.

[mindwalker_i]

12. You were so asleep that you rushed in here to say so!

Translation: "Shut up, shut up, just shut up!"

[HERVEPA]

2. Really? Washington Times. New York Post. Yahoo News.

Try getting some some real sources.
(Standard disclaimer. I am a Bernie guy)

[Arazi]

5. It's everywhere - Reuters, AP etc

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSMTZSAPEC2O2MGLXL

[RobertEarl]

7. Reminds me of 1972

Watergate was in the news and everyone discounted it. But Nixon resigned.

Looks like Hillary's turn.

We have to put and end to it now. No more H!

[angrychair]

8. What the hell does the source matter

In this context? When they are quoting the FBI, Justice department and other executive agencies and their investigation?

[angrychair]

9. Plus I also quoted

The Hill and Politico. They ok, I guess? Is there some master list out there? I get certain sources (Blaze, WND) At some point the purity test gets a little silly.

[Matariki]

13. I think HERVEPA was being sarcastic n/t

[angrychair]

14. Ahhhh

I can see that. Good catch.

[roguevalley]

4. its a non issue until it is. indictments are said to be coming. Enjoy the siesta until then.

I don't blame you.

[pdsimdars]

10. You might disturb their dream . . . .

I liken the Democratic machine to the Republicans and their climate denial. . . they have what they want to believe and nothing or no one will shake them from it.
Like you, I hope they really care about not letting a Republican win the presidency enough so they get behind Bernie, the only Democratic candidate who can win.