Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Irrefutable Analytics on Why it Will Be Clinton Vs. Trump After Today (Original Post) tgards79 Mar 2016 OP
Thanks for the article. I prefer less absolute Hortensis Mar 2016 #1
Interesting tgards79 Mar 2016 #2
Did he? I wouldn't be surprised, Hortensis Mar 2016 #3
Yes but BTRTN has called every race accurately... tgards79 Mar 2016 #4
In projections nothing counts for more than that. :) Hortensis Mar 2016 #5
You mean, after they stop sobbing? tgards79 Mar 2016 #6
Yes. Fascinating, and knock wood. Hortensis Mar 2016 #7
Ha ha true enough! tgards79 Mar 2016 #8
Ah, your predictions aren't as amateurish as mine? Hortensis Mar 2016 #9
By their projections for Super Tuesday, Bernie would have to win 54% of the remaining delegates. ieoeja Mar 2016 #10
She is at 98% at Predictwise. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #11

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
1. Thanks for the article. I prefer less absolute
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:34 AM
Mar 2016

projections, but it's hard to believe it won't be true in the end.

A shout out to American Samoa! 55,000 people. It's so unfortunate that, seemingly, no one has paid to poll their preferences, but I guess their vote will be a form of poll.

tgards79

(1,415 posts)
2. Interesting
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:52 AM
Mar 2016

I always thought Nate Silver lost people when he went to probabilities instead of absolute projections. Thanks for your perspective!

And yes, a shout out to American Samoa is in order!

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
3. Did he? I wouldn't be surprised,
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 07:57 AM
Mar 2016

having read more of a few of the otoh's. Otoh, this is such a weird election, with so many giant forces tearing old patterns apart...

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
5. In projections nothing counts for more than that. :)
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:32 AM
Mar 2016

The GOP race is even more interesting to me. The Donald is going to mostly run the board? WHAT will the GOP do!

tgards79

(1,415 posts)
6. You mean, after they stop sobbing?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:09 AM
Mar 2016

It is a real issue. I suspect several vulnerable GOP Senators (Kirk, Toomey, etc.) may have to break with Trump. I cant wait to see that! They could lose the Senate...and even the House!

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
7. Yes. Fascinating, and knock wood.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:29 AM
Mar 2016

Political scientists must be having a great time. Especially new ones without reputations to defend.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. Ah, your predictions aren't as amateurish as mine?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 02:36 PM
Mar 2016

I noticed you thought even the House could conceivably be in play. I've heard that as an extremely unlikely possibility before, and I was wondering what you were thinking.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
10. By their projections for Super Tuesday, Bernie would have to win 54% of the remaining delegates.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:27 PM
Mar 2016

By an interesting coincidence in 2008 Obama won 54% of the delegates after Super Tuesday.

Meaning this was a whole lot easier to refute than you thought it was.


[font size=1]Note: your site concluded 58% by counting unpledged Delegates as Pledged Delegates. I don't have the pre-Super Tuesday unpledged delegate counts for 2008. But a horde of them switched sides then which makes counting them as "pledged" at this point a waste of time.[/font]


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Irrefutable Analytics...