2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI heard that Bernie and Hillary voted the same way 99.99% of the time.
(OK, it was a different number. Never mind that) Woohoo, they are almost the same! Let's settle now.
It's just too bad that one of the votes on which they parted ways was the Iraq War Resolution.
I will never forget that she gave Bush the OK to start killing innocent people. She is the extended arm of that war criminal Kissinger with whom she spends her vacations. Never, never, never, will I vote for her. Ever.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Sanders supporters want the anti-Hillary.
Bernie has opened there eyes to what is possible.
I do not know what she can do to win those votes.
I am guessing it might be too late... that dies has been cast.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)emulatorloo
(44,120 posts)Dems, moderate Republicans and sane independents.
brush
(53,776 posts)Get real. Even republicans are saying they will vote for Clinton if he wins the repug nomination.
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)a republican say they would ever vote for Hillary. In fact, just the opposite. I constantly hear republicans say they could never in a million years and being held at gun point, cast their vote for Hillary.
Now in the past month I've heard no less than a dozen conservatives tell me they would vote for Sanders over Trump...a revelation that I harken back to Reagan Democrats...and coined Sanders Republicans.
But I have never heard a republican say they could vote for Hillary under any circumstances. They hate her and have for two decades. That hate is engrained. It's not likely going to change.
brush
(53,776 posts)she would vote for Hillary over Trump.
Faux pas
(14,672 posts)for her since 2008.
emulatorloo
(44,120 posts)You should check into the percentages of overlap between Bernie's votes and Cruz/Rubio voting records sometime. Can guarantee you they aren't even close.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Small percentages can make large differences.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)...
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Clinton is going to crush Trump. I hope you reconsider over time but I do understand your position. I completely disagree with the thought process but it is yours, not mine. It is up to Clinton and her supporters to try to earn your vote in the general.
Happy Super Tuesday.
PADemD
(4,482 posts)Does that mean the Clinton supporters will empty their ignore list?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)For something when they know it can't pass to make themselves look better. (Also against something that will pass anyway, for the same reason)
We know, between the two of them, which one would cast this type of manipulation vote and which one votes for the people.
randome
(34,845 posts)It was a political vote because everyone knew it was going to pass. Politicians become sensitive to being on the losing side of a vote, especially when it's about our Democratic 'weakness' regarding defense and especially when there was nothing to be gained by being on the losing side.
It's nothing to be in favor of, it's just the way things are in Washington.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
thereismore
(13,326 posts)themselves.
randome
(34,845 posts)Do you think she or John Kerry or any of the other Democrats in Congress who voted for the resolution would have done what Bush, Jr. did? Lie, fake evidence, and use 9/11 to scare us into compliance?
My answer is emphatically no. Which is why the parties are not the same and there is real value in voting for whomever our nominee is.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
thereismore
(13,326 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)In the throes of the Arab Spring, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi was facing a furious revolt by Libyans determined to end his quixotic 42-year rule. The dictator's forces were approaching Benghanzi, the crucible of the rebellion, and threatening a blood bath. France and Britain were urging the United States to join them in a military campaign to halt Colonel Qaddafi's troops, and now the Arab League, too, was calling for action.
It was a very complex and violent situation but if you're reading into it that it was nothing but 'adventurism' on Clinton's part, I think you are selectively seeing what you want.
Maybe it wasn't handled well, maybe it made ISIS stronger, all good points, but, again, the international community was practically begging us to intervene. It is not as simple as Clinton simply deciding one morning she wanted to kill some people, or to bully then.
Even this NYT article, critical of her, states that much.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
thereismore
(13,326 posts)hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)We were devastated when Hillary voted for the IWR. Virtually everyone here had expected her to vote No. Most of us were still big Clinton supporters back then. We've learned a lot in the interim.
Remember Howard Dean's run in '04? That started with his critique of Kerry and the rest who voted to "trust" babybush.
We know it was a political vote, but the majority of us disagree with that decision even more today than we did then
randome
(34,845 posts)Just the broad outlines. Many things intervened in my life since then to make me more aware. I was especially tuned into Obama's election and going forward from that.
Okay, so an appropriate amount of criticism was leveled at Clinton and Kerry and all the others for their votes. I still don't in any way, shape or form think she would unilaterally invade another country simply to project American power or for any similarly stupid reason as Bush, Jr. had to take us to war.
She is nothing like Bush, Jr., IMO, and the Democratic party is not the same as the Republican party. The possibility of another unneeded war on the scale of Iraq is very low on my list of concerns.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)I read the first words of the title and said to myself "this post must be about the IWR."
thereismore
(13,326 posts)is not less real to me.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Not really into the snark, just thought I'd let you know that it's becoming predictable around here - it's single issue politics when one dislikes a candidate and many issues when one defends their chosen candidate.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Surely you're joking!
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Its good that you are running away from it.
LexVegas
(6,060 posts)WDIM
(1,662 posts)gun and ammo industry every year.
We have a gun problem in this world and what does Clinton as SOS do? Approves more gun shipments to brutal killers around the world.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Pure genius.
WDIM
(1,662 posts)and allowed Bush and PNAC to have their never ending war of aggression and greed.
cleopotrick
(79 posts)usually spells doom for America and abroad:
Iraq
Patriot Act
Fracking
Welfare reform
DOMA
94 Crime bill
96 telecommunications act
etc.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)they will nominate a liberal candidate with integrity.