Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DavidDvorkin

(19,477 posts)
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:33 PM Feb 2012

Obama trails three of four Republican candidates in latest Iowa Poll

President Barack Obama trails three of the four Republican candidates in head-to-head match-ups if the election were held today, according to a new Iowa Poll.

The Republican with the biggest lead: Ron Paul, who would defeat Obama by 7 percentage points, 49 percent to 42 percent. Rick Santorum, winner of the 2012 Iowa caucuses, leads Obama 48 percent to 44 percent. Mitt Romney, edged in the caucuses by Santorum, leads Obama 46 percent to 44 percent.


http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20120218/NEWS09/120218015/Obama-trails-three-four-Republican-candidates-latest-Iowa-Poll

This is unsettling.
56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama trails three of four Republican candidates in latest Iowa Poll (Original Post) DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 OP
Unsettling,... MarianJack Feb 2012 #1
Let's hope not. DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #4
Bullshit. Lil Missy Feb 2012 #2
I think the Des Moines Register poll is considered reliable. DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #5
Normally it is but this is an outlier. Details given below grantcart Feb 2012 #9
As I said below, this is for Iowa, not nationwide. DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #11
so Iowans are batshit crazy and voting against their best interests? peacebird Feb 2012 #3
It's happened before DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #6
There's an Iowa kind of special annabanana Feb 2012 #52
Remember what IOWA stands for... Rosco T. Feb 2012 #7
Outlier - all other polls are showing Obama up by a lot grantcart Feb 2012 #8
Those are all nationwide numbers DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #10
You are right, I over clicked. grantcart Feb 2012 #13
Wow! That's the first bad number we have had in a while. aaaaaa5a Feb 2012 #12
Good points DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #14
Brother and family live there, elleng Feb 2012 #19
It's a pretty state, and it seems very green by my standards DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #22
Yes, heat and humidity there pretty bad that part of the country I recall, elleng Feb 2012 #30
So Ron Paul is the strongest Repuke candidate Thrill Feb 2012 #15
The whole poll reads like Porno for Fox Viewers emulatorloo Feb 2012 #49
Obama will win Iowa. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2012 #16
here is an interesting discussion of the poll grantcart Feb 2012 #17
Does this mean it is time to get CONCERNED? I just want to make sure I am appropriately renie408 Feb 2012 #18
LOL PSPS Feb 2012 #24
+100 MineralMan Feb 2012 #39
+200 treestar Feb 2012 #45
I just love seeing Paul winning these things. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #20
Oh yeah. ForgoTheConsequence Feb 2012 #21
Yes, I confess. The man is a detestable peace Nazi. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #25
agreed..and I'm not alone...nt xiamiam Feb 2012 #31
No one in the world is alone friend. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #32
Hear hear. nt woo me with science Feb 2012 #37
I bet you do. Ikonoklast Feb 2012 #35
Aginst Iran War. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #43
I don't think you are a Republican. Ikonoklast Feb 2012 #46
You are probably right. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #53
It doesn't look like that's what Iowans are worried about, though muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #36
Ron Paul is one of the biggest enemies of civil liberties there is. NYC Liberal Feb 2012 #47
LOL...sorry, but LOL Drunken Irishman Feb 2012 #23
611 people were asked election questions.... HuskiesHowls Feb 2012 #26
For one state that is a big number. former9thward Feb 2012 #51
I don't buy this for one second Renew Deal Feb 2012 #27
Totally agree. This poll is suspect. DCBob Feb 2012 #34
Let's hope the Republicans respond by nominating Paul or Santorum. n/t geek tragedy Feb 2012 #28
The last poll taken in Iowa (12/2011) showed Obama up by 7 points, with an MOE of only +-2.5% SaintPete Feb 2012 #29
There is a lot of bullshit in Iowa Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #33
Iowa is a split state. justgamma Feb 2012 #38
Thanks for the FUD! MineralMan Feb 2012 #40
After 1980, I don't take anything for granted. DavidDvorkin Feb 2012 #41
If you consider the axiom that all politics is local, this isn't a surprise to me OmahaBlueDog Feb 2012 #42
Meh, there is still plenty of time and when they settle their candidate treestar Feb 2012 #44
I read article today in the DMR. They claim 51% of Iowa Democrats want Newt Gingrich for President emulatorloo Feb 2012 #48
The article is a little misleading: Obama beats Gingrich 51 to 37 but loses to the others. libinnyandia Feb 2012 #50
This IS unsettling Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2012 #54
Simple question DFW Feb 2012 #55
Obama up by 7 lovekendyl Feb 2012 #56

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
9. Normally it is but this is an outlier. Details given below
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:50 PM
Feb 2012


Obama is up on every candidate in every other poll.

Sometimes it happens.

I am surprised that they published it.

The fact that it put Paul as the strongest GE candidate was also a clue.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
52. There's an Iowa kind of special
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 08:54 PM
Feb 2012

chip on the shoulder attitude we've never been without that we recall.

We can be cold As our falling thermometers in December
If you ask about our weather in July.
And we're so by God stubborn We could stand touchin' noses
For a week at a time And never see eye-to-eye.

Rosco T.

(6,496 posts)
7. Remember what IOWA stands for...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:47 PM
Feb 2012

Idiots
Out
Wandering
Around

(hear that during caucus coverage, not mine!)

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
12. Wow! That's the first bad number we have had in a while.
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:52 PM
Feb 2012

Question?


Does it make any sense that Ron Paul is the strongest candidate? Or that Romney is the weakest?


Remember, this is the state where the GOP spent a year visiting every county, city, town and local diner, bashing Obama. That is bound to have an impact. My bet is over the next few months Iowa will bounce back to the national trend lines which are all currently favoring the President.


Think about it. Is the President seriously going to carry a place like Virginia and lose in Iowa? Probably not. Especially if such a loss is based on a poll that has Ron Paul as the strongest GOP candidate in the state.

elleng

(130,906 posts)
19. Brother and family live there,
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:18 AM
Feb 2012

I know some others there, too, and not at all wacky, imo. Plan to visit next month, but I'm not keen on living there either; prefer the green East Coast!

DavidDvorkin

(19,477 posts)
22. It's a pretty state, and it seems very green by my standards
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:41 AM
Feb 2012

But I live in Denver. I've been in Des Moines in the summer, and the heat and humidity were dreadful.

elleng

(130,906 posts)
30. Yes, heat and humidity there pretty bad that part of the country I recall,
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 01:33 AM
Feb 2012

particularly St. Louis in summer;h orrendous!

Hoping to visit high school classmates in Denver after visiting family in Iowa next month. Lived in Denver 2/3 year 30? years ago. Enjoyed the climate VERY much!

Thrill

(19,178 posts)
15. So Ron Paul is the strongest Repuke candidate
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 11:58 PM
Feb 2012

But couldn't even finish third in the primary there? That's weird

renie408

(9,854 posts)
18. Does this mean it is time to get CONCERNED? I just want to make sure I am appropriately
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:17 AM
Feb 2012

worried at all times. I mean, the election is only 9 and a half months away. You can never start worrying too soon.

napoleon_in_rags

(3,991 posts)
20. I just love seeing Paul winning these things.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:20 AM
Feb 2012

Its a simple and clear message, stop invading other countries, restore civil liberties. So many people don't agree with the full Ron Paul message, but these two things give him such an incredible bump, its worth paying attention to.

napoleon_in_rags

(3,991 posts)
25. Yes, I confess. The man is a detestable peace Nazi.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:51 AM
Feb 2012

If left to his dark ways, the US would abstain from attacking more countries that didn't attack us but deserve to be attacked, and the whole affair would be horribly homophobic and racist, lacking in the perfect moral values that led to the spraying of all arab children in Fallujah with white phosphorus to subdue them, and so many other things.

Look guy, I understand a legit disagreement with Paul's policies, and in fact I agree... But when when your standing stretched out like Leonardo DiCaprio on the front of Titanic celebrating almost limitless war crimes against citizens in the country we invaded for WMDs they didn't have in the name of the USA, a little introspection is due. America had some capital after 9/11, and its all been burned. The wars against countries that didn't attack us is INSEPARABLE from the attack on civil liberties, which are civil rights. We are a free people, and won't be cowed.

napoleon_in_rags

(3,991 posts)
32. No one in the world is alone friend.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 03:19 AM
Feb 2012

My prayers are with Israel. I see these Neocons laying that nation's security on the gambling table, trusting in their past failed policies (like Iraq war) to create peace. But really, its in brotherhood that peace lies. Its in communication between peers. I dream of the time when Iran and Israel will compete for science achievements, with threats of doom off the table. That to me is the prime promise of us peaceniks, right and left. A world where war has left the room and is off the table.

napoleon_in_rags

(3,991 posts)
43. Aginst Iran War.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:40 PM
Feb 2012

Pro-peace. Think neocon policies are bad for us, bad for Israel, bad for everybody. That's it. If you think I'm a republican, let me know and I will provide a long list of things "we" are wrong about.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
46. I don't think you are a Republican.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 01:21 PM
Feb 2012

I do think you are being simplistic about Ron Paul.

If Paul was ever president of this nation he would go to war when the Republicans told him to; he is, after all, nothing more than a Republican dressed in a cheap Libertarian suit, and not the other way around.



napoleon_in_rags

(3,991 posts)
53. You are probably right.
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 04:32 PM
Feb 2012

And even if he did mean the best, huge pressures seem to often push leaders around in DC. But I do see his support as a sign of the end of the right wing madness of wanting perpetual war and small government. Cutting taxes and starting wars puts this country in peril that its not in if it just does one or the others.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,316 posts)
36. It doesn't look like that's what Iowans are worried about, though
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 10:03 AM
Feb 2012

When asked about things Obama is doing, they replied (sorry for the lack of formatting - DU3 doesn't seem to support it)

Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president?
(Follow with Do you approve or disapprove of the job he is doing: (Rotate B through F.)
Approve Disapprove Not Sure
His job as president 46 48 6
With the economy 38 58 4
With health care 36 58 6
With relations with other countries 52 41 7
With the budget deficit 33 61 6
With his handling of the war in Afghanistan 56 36 8

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/assets/pdf/D2185311218.PDF

So they like the way he handles relations with other countries, and the war in Afghanistan; it's the economy, health care, and the budget deficit where they don't like what he's done. Most of that Ron Paul support comes from people who don't give a toss about invading other countries.

HuskiesHowls

(711 posts)
26. 611 people were asked election questions....
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:51 AM
Feb 2012

And they called a total of 800 people.

That is a rather small percentage of the voters in Iowa...even though we are not quite the most populous state.

former9thward

(32,006 posts)
51. For one state that is a big number.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 08:47 PM
Feb 2012

For national polls they usually ask about 1500 people which is an average of 30 persons per state.

Renew Deal

(81,859 posts)
27. I don't buy this for one second
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:57 AM
Feb 2012

Ron Paul is the strongest candidate against Obama and Obama is losing Iowa? I don't buy it.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
34. Totally agree. This poll is suspect.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 08:16 AM
Feb 2012

Iowa could be a tough state for the President but these numbers make no sense at all.

SaintPete

(533 posts)
29. The last poll taken in Iowa (12/2011) showed Obama up by 7 points, with an MOE of only +-2.5%
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 01:23 AM
Feb 2012

This poll has a MOE of +-4%.

Does ANYBODY really believe that Romney has fallen against all his Republican contenders, but has risen against Obama? Really? with employment down, and the economy improving?

Iowa has gone blue in 5 of the last 6 elections.

By the end of next November, we'll all be saying "Iowa has gone blue in 6 of the last 7 elections."

justgamma

(3,665 posts)
38. Iowa is a split state.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:16 AM
Feb 2012

The west side is extremely red and the east side is pretty blue. That's how we got the fantastic Harkin and Braley and that freak Steve King.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
42. If you consider the axiom that all politics is local, this isn't a surprise to me
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:21 PM
Feb 2012

People who live along the rivers in Iowa are mad at the Federal government. Many Sioux City and Council Bluffs residents blame the Army Corps for this past summer's floods. People in the quad cities are still bitter over what they perceive as slow FEMA response to the floods in 2008. When you're mad at the feds, the President becomes the lightning rod.

Iowa is not a lost cause, however, and should be a frequent part of a midwest campaign swing (along with MI, WI, and MO).

emulatorloo

(44,124 posts)
48. I read article today in the DMR. They claim 51% of Iowa Democrats want Newt Gingrich for President
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 06:26 PM
Feb 2012

Which I gotta tell you as an Iowan, sound totally preposterous and unbelievable.

I don't know who the hell they called, but it sounds like they confined themselves to the area of the state that is represented by Steve King R-IA.

libinnyandia

(1,374 posts)
50. The article is a little misleading: Obama beats Gingrich 51 to 37 but loses to the others.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 07:43 PM
Feb 2012

I guess they don't read papers or watch tv. I live in Iowa and I hope the voters in central and eastern Iowa don't vote like the voters in western Iowa.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
54. This IS unsettling
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 05:23 PM
Feb 2012

but the campaign hasn't even begun in earnest yet. The only way Iowa goes red is if it looks like the GOP nominee does really well for some reason (i.e. Bush 2004). I'm not seeing it happen so far.

DFW

(54,379 posts)
55. Simple question
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 06:32 PM
Feb 2012

How much attention has been focused on Republicans in Iowa in the last 2 months?

Next question:

How much attention (not affiliated with republican candidates) has been focused on Obama in Iowa in the last 2 months?

Next question:

Do I really need a next question?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Obama trails three of fou...