2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumObama trails three of four Republican candidates in latest Iowa Poll
The Republican with the biggest lead: Ron Paul, who would defeat Obama by 7 percentage points, 49 percent to 42 percent. Rick Santorum, winner of the 2012 Iowa caucuses, leads Obama 48 percent to 44 percent. Mitt Romney, edged in the caucuses by Santorum, leads Obama 46 percent to 44 percent.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20120218/NEWS09/120218015/Obama-trails-three-four-Republican-candidates-latest-Iowa-Poll
This is unsettling.
MarianJack
(10,237 posts)...but it won't last.
PEACE!
DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)Obama is up on every candidate in every other poll.
Sometimes it happens.
I am surprised that they published it.
The fact that it put Paul as the strongest GE candidate was also a clue.
DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)Throughout the country.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)chip on the shoulder attitude we've never been without that we recall.
We can be cold As our falling thermometers in December
If you ask about our weather in July.
And we're so by God stubborn We could stand touchin' noses
For a week at a time And never see eye-to-eye.
Rosco T.
(6,496 posts)Idiots
Out
Wandering
Around
(hear that during caucus coverage, not mine!)
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Romney
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
Santorum
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_santorum_vs_obama-2912.html
Paul
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_paul_vs_obama-1750.html
DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)The one I quoted is specifically for Iowa.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)Question?
Does it make any sense that Ron Paul is the strongest candidate? Or that Romney is the weakest?
Remember, this is the state where the GOP spent a year visiting every county, city, town and local diner, bashing Obama. That is bound to have an impact. My bet is over the next few months Iowa will bounce back to the national trend lines which are all currently favoring the President.
Think about it. Is the President seriously going to carry a place like Virginia and lose in Iowa? Probably not. Especially if such a loss is based on a poll that has Ron Paul as the strongest GOP candidate in the state.
DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)I wouldn't be comfortable living in Iowa, but it's not in general a truly wacky state.
elleng
(130,906 posts)I know some others there, too, and not at all wacky, imo. Plan to visit next month, but I'm not keen on living there either; prefer the green East Coast!
DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)But I live in Denver. I've been in Des Moines in the summer, and the heat and humidity were dreadful.
elleng
(130,906 posts)particularly St. Louis in summer;h orrendous!
Hoping to visit high school classmates in Denver after visiting family in Iowa next month. Lived in Denver 2/3 year 30? years ago. Enjoyed the climate VERY much!
Thrill
(19,178 posts)But couldn't even finish third in the primary there? That's weird
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)Lots of crazy stuff in it.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)I'm not even worried about it.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)I think that the person who said
"crosstabs or this isn't real" is a good idea.
renie408
(9,854 posts)worried at all times. I mean, the election is only 9 and a half months away. You can never start worrying too soon.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)Spreading FUD is a popular sport on DU.
Exactly!
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)Its a simple and clear message, stop invading other countries, restore civil liberties. So many people don't agree with the full Ron Paul message, but these two things give him such an incredible bump, its worth paying attention to.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)Restore civil liberties, but screw civil rights.
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)If left to his dark ways, the US would abstain from attacking more countries that didn't attack us but deserve to be attacked, and the whole affair would be horribly homophobic and racist, lacking in the perfect moral values that led to the spraying of all arab children in Fallujah with white phosphorus to subdue them, and so many other things.
Look guy, I understand a legit disagreement with Paul's policies, and in fact I agree... But when when your standing stretched out like Leonardo DiCaprio on the front of Titanic celebrating almost limitless war crimes against citizens in the country we invaded for WMDs they didn't have in the name of the USA, a little introspection is due. America had some capital after 9/11, and its all been burned. The wars against countries that didn't attack us is INSEPARABLE from the attack on civil liberties, which are civil rights. We are a free people, and won't be cowed.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)My prayers are with Israel. I see these Neocons laying that nation's security on the gambling table, trusting in their past failed policies (like Iraq war) to create peace. But really, its in brotherhood that peace lies. Its in communication between peers. I dream of the time when Iran and Israel will compete for science achievements, with threats of doom off the table. That to me is the prime promise of us peaceniks, right and left. A world where war has left the room and is off the table.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)Pro-peace. Think neocon policies are bad for us, bad for Israel, bad for everybody. That's it. If you think I'm a republican, let me know and I will provide a long list of things "we" are wrong about.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)I do think you are being simplistic about Ron Paul.
If Paul was ever president of this nation he would go to war when the Republicans told him to; he is, after all, nothing more than a Republican dressed in a cheap Libertarian suit, and not the other way around.
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)And even if he did mean the best, huge pressures seem to often push leaders around in DC. But I do see his support as a sign of the end of the right wing madness of wanting perpetual war and small government. Cutting taxes and starting wars puts this country in peril that its not in if it just does one or the others.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)When asked about things Obama is doing, they replied (sorry for the lack of formatting - DU3 doesn't seem to support it)
Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president?
(Follow with Do you approve or disapprove of the job he is doing: (Rotate B through F.)
Approve Disapprove Not Sure
His job as president 46 48 6
With the economy 38 58 4
With health care 36 58 6
With relations with other countries 52 41 7
With the budget deficit 33 61 6
With his handling of the war in Afghanistan 56 36 8
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/assets/pdf/D2185311218.PDF
So they like the way he handles relations with other countries, and the war in Afghanistan; it's the economy, health care, and the budget deficit where they don't like what he's done. Most of that Ron Paul support comes from people who don't give a toss about invading other countries.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)HuskiesHowls
(711 posts)And they called a total of 800 people.
That is a rather small percentage of the voters in Iowa...even though we are not quite the most populous state.
former9thward
(32,006 posts)For national polls they usually ask about 1500 people which is an average of 30 persons per state.
Renew Deal
(81,859 posts)Ron Paul is the strongest candidate against Obama and Obama is losing Iowa? I don't buy it.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Iowa could be a tough state for the President but these numbers make no sense at all.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)SaintPete
(533 posts)This poll has a MOE of +-4%.
Does ANYBODY really believe that Romney has fallen against all his Republican contenders, but has risen against Obama? Really? with employment down, and the economy improving?
Iowa has gone blue in 5 of the last 6 elections.
By the end of next November, we'll all be saying "Iowa has gone blue in 6 of the last 7 elections."
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)plus a lot of pigs and corn
justgamma
(3,665 posts)The west side is extremely red and the east side is pretty blue. That's how we got the fantastic Harkin and Braley and that freak Steve King.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)We just don't get enough of that...
DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)People who live along the rivers in Iowa are mad at the Federal government. Many Sioux City and Council Bluffs residents blame the Army Corps for this past summer's floods. People in the quad cities are still bitter over what they perceive as slow FEMA response to the floods in 2008. When you're mad at the feds, the President becomes the lightning rod.
Iowa is not a lost cause, however, and should be a frequent part of a midwest campaign swing (along with MI, WI, and MO).
treestar
(82,383 posts)It will matter a lot more.
emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)Which I gotta tell you as an Iowan, sound totally preposterous and unbelievable.
I don't know who the hell they called, but it sounds like they confined themselves to the area of the state that is represented by Steve King R-IA.
libinnyandia
(1,374 posts)I guess they don't read papers or watch tv. I live in Iowa and I hope the voters in central and eastern Iowa don't vote like the voters in western Iowa.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)but the campaign hasn't even begun in earnest yet. The only way Iowa goes red is if it looks like the GOP nominee does really well for some reason (i.e. Bush 2004). I'm not seeing it happen so far.
DFW
(54,379 posts)How much attention has been focused on Republicans in Iowa in the last 2 months?
Next question:
How much attention (not affiliated with republican candidates) has been focused on Obama in Iowa in the last 2 months?
Next question:
Do I really need a next question?
lovekendyl
(61 posts)I saw a poll on Now with Alex Wagner last week that had Obama up 7 points in Iowa...