2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum510 to 359, with 165 pledged delegates pending. It's time to come to Jesus.
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/D-PU.phtmlHillary is now leading in the PD count by a mere 151. The 165 to be allocated remain in Texas, Tennessee and Dems Abroad. Hillary will take the lion's share of those.
While 151 is not an insurmountable difference to overcome, the margins of each candidate's respective victories is. Hillary has absolutely clobbered Sanders in the south. But Sanders victories (other than in NH and VT) have not been by similar margins.
As we move forward there are a few more southern states which Hillary will pad her lead with. The other states, even if Bernie took them all (which he won't), it will not be by margins to overtake Hillary's count.
At this point, I don't see a viable path to the nomination for Bernie. However, I still support him and the continuance of his campaign because things can happen. And I would prefer that Bernie be the one standing strong in second with a ole of delegates should an unforeseeable circumstance compromise Hillary.
I also think there is value in a show of how much support and excitement Bernie's message can generate through continued campaigning.
And this may not be popular here (and I was a strong proponent of Bernie going negative harder and earlier), but the rest of the campaign should be issue and message focused. It will not serve us for either candidate to be smeared or to focus on electability arguments. Either candidate can and must beat the gopper proffer, particularly if Trump.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)and since when does Hillary = "Jesus" ??
6chars
(3,967 posts)Hillary has been crucified by the rw for 25 years
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)you can start there.
you are free to give up if you want(which of course is exactly what they wanted )
but most of us are fighting on. this was always a pitched hill and a rigged game.
bernie is doing great and has plenty of money to spend, no fbi probe over his head and a great message.
only the beginning....
morningfog
(18,115 posts)I don't see Bernie winning the big states like MI, NY, FL. And the states he will win will be by narrower margins than his losses.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)I don't think so.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)If Bernie is going to win, he needs to go from under-performing his delegate targets to OVER-performing. How does he do that?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)After the 15th, if things go as expected, Clinton could lose every remaining state 65-35 and still get the nomination, and that's WITHOUT superdelegates.
The math gets very rough, very quickly.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)and again, he is in until convention. hillary desperately needs bernie out because her best states are largely behind her.
sorry, not buying the narraritive.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Current 538 projections put her chances at over 90% in Florida, Illinois, North Carolina and Ohio. Bernie is going to get eviscerated on the 15th.
But you are, of course, free to believe what you want.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)we shall have to stay tuned, as they say...
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)<flush>
snooper2
(30,151 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Things can happen! As a Hillary supporter, I want as many Dems as possible to have their voices and their votes heard. I think a long, substantive primary is good for everyone, and people feel more enfranchised if it's not a done deal by the time their state rolls around.
Hillary has a commanding lead, and I'm pleased for her, but I think Bernie supporters should continue to fight and ensure their issues are heard, nationally. Congratulations on Bernie's wins last night.
Agree completely re: substantive and issue-focussed campaigning for the rest of the primary.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)Nope. Not feeling it. feeling the Bern more than ever
peacebird
(14,195 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)Gonna see what else I can do too.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)You and Jesus knock yourselves out, I'll be riding with Bernie 'till the end.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'm proud of my VT Senator and so happy I got to vote for him against Tarrant in VT. I hope he does not remain quiet and I hope that should Hillary win the nomination she involve him in moving toward, it would be the right thing to do.
I agree that I see a Sanders nomination as w challenge, but I also admit that this primary is not over by a long shot.
Thanks for your post.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Pretty awesome.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'm now in Mass, by way of PA, NH, and NY.
I get around.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Me thinks Hillary has a HUGE margin...
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)It was 2 million or so earlier today. Of course, that doesn't matter much in the primaries, but it's nice to know anyway.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,716 posts)Democrats Ascendant
(601 posts)I really appreciate your post morningfog! Although I'm in the bag for Clinton, I agree that Sanders should continue in the race as long as he wants. As long as things stay civil and respectful, the issues-focused debate, the media attention, and the outreach to new, young, and independent voters will only help the Democratic cause and whoever the nominee will be.
Peace!
tazkcmo
(7,303 posts)That's Sen Sanders' position and I believe he will conduct his campaign accordingly.
I pretty much agree with your post and respect the opinion of the author. It's reasonable and actually the same narrative we've been hearing for 4 months except with reduced dismissal of Sen Sanders. Instead of fringe candidate he's now a competitive candidate. Other than that, Sec Clinton is and has been the presumptive nominee and until actually defeated will remain that. No surprise there.
Negative campaigning, arm twisting, threats of retaliation, lies. No surprises here, either. Expected. Solid wins in the south. Same thing, it was expected. The only surprises this campaign have been the support shown for Sen Sanders. Everything else was a known.
Raster
(20,998 posts)...which will probably come down to a question of who is hated more: Clinton or Trump.
Unfortunately, Clinton may win that prize. And even though Sanders has the highest favorability rating OF ANY CANDIDATE, the DWS/DNC/DLC has chosen to do everything in its power to sink the Sanders candidacy, and soon, will realize that all of those Sanders supporters - many of them young people experiencing American politics for the first time - would rather: (1) vote for the other guy; or (2) write-in Sanders or someone else.
So THANKS* Party "Elite" for placing all of our bets on the candidate most likely to lose. If there is any silver lining, it is that DWS will hopefully get voted out of Congress and will end up having to get that waitress in a Deli job she is most qualified for.
-------
*And by thanks, I really mean F.Y.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)With only four percent of the nation having voted yet? Surely, you jest.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)This is just the reality. We have enough representative data to make informed projections. I wish the state of the race were different.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)I can't conscience calling it based on four percent of the electorate. Not this soon. There's a lot more fight to be had.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)My bad.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Support your guy as long as you can and make sure his message is heard loud and clear.
obamanut2012
(26,154 posts)Then the Michigan delegates were tossed, and I knew Hillary was finished, but I still supported her until she backed Obama. And then backed Obama.
Everyone has to find their own path.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)So she's beating him by nearly 200 delegates. I don't see a path to victory for Sanders here. Especially with some of the additional drubbings he has coming up.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/democrats/
Stuckinthebush
(10,847 posts)His path is almost non existent.
But I think he should stay in. No need to quit yet. Once March is over it'll be very clear he can't win. Then, perhaps.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Your link just doesn't allocate all the available delegates. It's like they just quit in the middle. In any case the spread is actually closer to 200 in Clinton's favor.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)are not relying on estimates as 538 is.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)You're painting a misleading picture. You should either use accurate data or not use data at all.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)allocated. As per usual, you are just wrong. The Green Papers is the gold standard on tracking delegates and predates 538. There is not a single fucking thing misleading about their numbers.
I notice you ignore the entire point of the post to make a bullshit bad faith argument. Aren't you just back from another time out due to your disruptive posting habits?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Your numbers are massively off target. Sorry.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)So very very proud of it.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)LOL!
morningfog
(18,115 posts)At the bottom of the fivethirtyeight page, http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/democrats/ which tabulates the data is a link to sources:
Do you see who 538 relies on to count the delegate allocation? The Green Papers. The gold fucking standard. 538 filled in the gaps with estimates.
Kindly slink away with your ignorance and disruption.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/democrats/
And from my fucking OP:
I accept your apology for you being so unnecessarily rude due to your ignorance and hate.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)That's why it's not called an estimate. Is 538 probably right? Yes. But those delegates aren't officially allocated at this point. They will be soon, but they aren't yet.
Old Codger
(4,205 posts)Quitters never win and winners never quit, sad that you or anyone feels that way
pengu
(462 posts)If you support Bernie, you don't say things like he has no path to the nomination. Most of the people haven't voted yet.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)it's all about the delegates, and the math is working against Bernie.
Sid
demwing
(16,916 posts)And unless you are Jesus, I'll just keep ignoring your defeatist messages.
Come to Jesus...
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)He'll need several of those and it's not going to happen. Bernie knows it too. He's smart.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)She 3/4 of the delegates are yet to be determined. Sure, the state by state math may not look great, but I would prefer he keep campaigning until it's official. I feel like Hillary Clinton's faults are too big to just roll over and give up. Her supporters on this website haven't helped any with the easy willingness to outright lie about positions, refusal to discuss issues, and then turn around and expect loyalty from people they've gone out of their way to disenfranchise.
Koinos
(2,792 posts)The rest of the primary season is very demanding with regard to resources: ads, local organization, ground game, GOTV. I think that Sanders should have no problem with that.
I do think the tone between supporters of the two campaigns should be civil and respectful. One can respectfully disagree, without burning bridges that will be necessary in the general election.
The way I see things, Clinton can deliver the Obama coalition, with African-Americans and Hispanics. Sanders can deliver a good number of younger voters, if he can get them to the polls.
Whoever is the nominee, if the candidates can find common ground, their combined effort in the general election would blow away any Republican.
Otherwise, if Clinton is the nominee, disappointed young voters may stay home; and, if Sanders is the nominee, the Obama coalition may break up, and too many African-Americans and Hispanics may stay home.
This country needs to find some way for both tremendous campaigns to coalesce. Just as a common enemy during wartime brings opposing political parties together, so may Democrats unite despite their differences to defeat Republican fascism, hatred, and bigotry.
I am hopeful that, the longer this primary continues, opportunities for reconciliation and shared vision are fostered rather than discarded.
demwing
(16,916 posts)We need to believe that protecting Hillary is more important, or some such nonsense.
Defeatist bullshit, in other words.
Koinos
(2,792 posts)If Sanders continues to campaign until the convention, he and his delegates will have a lot of influence in writing the platform and setting the agenda for down ticket elections. We may even see a spirited platform fight or two. This will be good for the Democratic party, whether Sanders is or is not the nominee.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)the calls for Sanders to come to heel, withdraw, and all of us leftists Democrats or not better get in line.
No thank you.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)obamanut2012
(26,154 posts)Both candidates should be issue-driven, and both candidates will definitely endorse and support whichever one of them wins the nomination. If someone Bernie pulls this off, he has my support and my vote.
It looks like Trump will be GOP nom, maybe Rubio, and both are horrible for the US and its people. Solidarity against fascism is what defeats fascism.
Onward and upward!
Great positive post -- all of us should do that more.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)But her only victories out of the South were extremely close in Mass, Iowa, and Nev. Theres 33 more on-southern states to go, Sanders will be competively in all of them. If Clinton can only win solid primary victories in the conservative southern states, it doesn't bode well for the GE as she'll get clobbered in those states in the GE.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Faux pas
(14,695 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)This is not even close to being over.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I will support him until the convention. I will not say on DU who I will vote for in the general election. Hillary supporters and even Hillary's campaign are running a dirty campaign so good luck getting them to stop or getting Bernie supporters to stop calling them out on it. No, this is still a knock down drag out fight. I will not have my freedom to vote taken from me and I will not have my voice silenced.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Bernie, or my ballot comes with options. My vote isn't for sale.
WDIM
(1,662 posts)People saying Bernie cannot appeal to voters and cannot win has been proven wrong.
Sanders won in one of the darkest red states in the country. A Democratic Socialist from Vermont won in red state Oklahoma.
People are truly seeing the corruption in our government, in our banking system, in our corporations, the system is corrupt and it will fail.
Hillary is sounding more like Bernie everyday of course with her we know its fake it till you make it. But the progressives that have come out in support of Bernie need to keep pushing! We cannot let up the pressure on the establishment. It is time to make it clear that the time for their corruption and greed has come to an end!
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And by a lot.
WDIM
(1,662 posts)He has come out of obscurity where only political watchers knew Bernie Sanders.
He is only losing due to name recognition and people not being informed on the issues or the candidates.
Clinton is a household name. People have fond delusional memories of the 90s.
But what he has overcome in this 8 months proves that his message is meaningful to people.
People are fed up with the status quo.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)How do you explain Hillary supporters on DU and other hyper-political types?
I promise you that I'm informed. And I'm supporting Hillary. So how does that fit with your theory that Bernie is only losing due to name recognition and people not being informed on the issues or the candidates?
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)The successes that Sanders has had should serve as a starting point for future activism around certain issues.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Sorry, religious ways of saying "give up" grate on my nerves.
Response to morningfog (Original post)
peacebird This message was self-deleted by its author.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)to mean "take an honest look."
Obviously poor choice of words on my part because many seemed incapable of reading past it.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)My apologies! I will delete my comment.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)This is an election, not an alter call. And I am sick of this shit. Super sick of it. An entire lifetime, all the progress of the Obama years and we are still doing this crap each cycle.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I'm a nonbeliever, but I use it myself and not as an anti-gay dog whistle.
The phrase on its own can have pretty nebulous meanings, but its use in "come-to-Jesus moment," which is clearly how it was meant in this thread, is clearly described in Urban Dictionary as:
I hope this helps. I wouldn't care to be mistaken for either a Jesus freak or a gay basher.
Regarding being misunderstood, I also wouldn't like my explanation here to be misconstrued as support for the abuse Morningfog directed at another poster. It's not the coarse language I mind, Fog, it's the abusive and assaultive language that is unacceptable.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)SamKnause
(13,110 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)And thank you. Me too!
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)I don't think so. Anyway, Jesus wouldn't like the influence of big money in politics.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)no thanks. Not the sort of verbiage the DOMA branch needs to use if it wants any money or time going forward. So fucking sick of the whole religion in politics thing. It's cost me too many years and far too much money, fuck that.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)I was reading threads last night and could hardly believe how many people were denying reality, going so far as to say Sanders "won" Super Tuesday. So many posts, for instance, about how Clinton can only win "deeply red"/southern/confederate states--as if Sanders is likely to dominate in IL, MI, OH, PA, NY, NJ, MD, HI, CA, NM, and so on. As if the people voting in the Democratic primaries of those southern states aren't "real" Democrats like those in, say, Oklahoma and Colorado.
And then there are all those folks trying to draw a comparison to 2008, as if Clinton vs. Obama is a similar dynamic to Clinton vs. Sanders, which is laughably absurd.
I'm not a Gore/Kerry/Obama/Clinton/neoliberal supporter, but I think having a grip on reality is important. Last night's threads displayed some serious delusion.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)known as democracy here in the USA.
Only in a Banana Republic does an electorate put up with having not open elections, but two outmoded, DINO parties arrange for "primary elections" in which the winners of such are basically already decided upon from the get-go.
Bernie would win an a landslide if voters were simply given a pencil and paper and a list of names come November 2016.
But he loses in the primaries because many of those who support him fall into the non-affiliated voter segment of the population - a segment that is larger than that of either of the two parties.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)He told me never vote for corruption or warmongers.
He also asks you to stop speaking for him.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)I am a secular atheist but have long used this phase to mean face a hard truth.its so common and base to me I didn't even consider the religious and anti religious reaction. It distracted from the point. Oh well.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)I dont openly advocate for any pretend superbeings but that guy would never endorse hillary
Cluster bombs alone would make him shit his robe .
morningfog
(18,115 posts)bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)Oh, and be nice. I'm with Bernie for as long as he's in it. Hopefully he wins the nomination but I'll admit he's a long shot. If Hillary wants more from me than a reluctant vote I do not want to be lectured at.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)And I said explicitly in the OP he should stay in. I'm just looking at the political realities. I'm a poli a I data nerd.
WiffenPoof
(2,404 posts)...there would be no math involved.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)WiffenPoof
(2,404 posts)I didn't think that anyone would get my humor.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Demanding/suggesting/claiming that Jewish person(s) need to "come to Jesus".
No we don't, ever.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)So it goes. I ardently non-religious, an atheist. It's part of my secular vernacular to mean face a hard truth. Too many shoulders with chips here to get past a common phrase.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Tell your children that mommy and daddy are going to hell and they will too, unless they run away to church.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)I spoke in ignorance.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)It's refreshing.