Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it just me or were debates better when the audience had to remain silent throughout. (Original Post) iandhr Mar 2016 OP
Yes they were. elleng Mar 2016 #1
Silence is golden TheCowsCameHome Mar 2016 #2
yep....the audience should be required to be silent until they are done beachbum bob Mar 2016 #3
Yes. zappaman Mar 2016 #4
They were definitely better when the size of a candidates willie was not part of the discussion tularetom Mar 2016 #5
The Republican debates would be better if everybody was silent. mythology Mar 2016 #6
 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
3. yep....the audience should be required to be silent until they are done
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 09:13 PM
Mar 2016

let the candidates speak.....

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
4. Yes.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 09:15 PM
Mar 2016

I finally listened to the last Republican debate(avoided all the others) and it sounded like The Jerry Springer Show.
No reason for the audience to act up.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
5. They were definitely better when the size of a candidates willie was not part of the discussion
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 09:18 PM
Mar 2016

Given the level to which the whole debate format has sunk to, it wouldn't do much good to try and shush the audience.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is it just me or were deb...