Yes, it is wrong to use vulgarity when referrring to Bernie. The same thing applies to those

[still_one]

that do the same thing against Hillary.

I can only control what I do. I don't participate in those dialogs, or recommend them.

No one here is that naive not to realize that garbage has been thrown at Hillary for sometime now.

The jury system is broken. The "community standard" is in the eye of the beholder.

I know there are those who believe there should be nothing barred, using the free speech reasoning. However, "calling fire in a theater, when there is no fire", is not an exercise of free speech.

[Buzz Clik]

1. My only plea would be for consistency.

If we're hiding posts for calling Sanders vulgar names, we do the same for those referring to Clinton with vulgarity.

At the present time, that consistency is nonexistent (probably due to the unequal distribution at DU of Sanders supporters vs Clinton supporters).

And how we came to the point of accepting base insults hurled at posters is unknown to me.

[still_one]

3. with the jury system we have there won't be consistency

[panader0]

2. If calling Bernie a "motherfucker" is okay, what terms can we now use about HRC?

I can think of several, but I'm not looking for a hide.
Disgusting....

[Buzz Clik]

4. It's not okay. Period.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

5. I saw the post that has DU all aflutter.

I eschew gratuitous vulgarities. However as Sister Souljah said "two wrongs don't make a right but they damn sure make us even."

[randome]

6. When people depend on being a 'shock jock' to get their point across, they've already lost.

It's a sign of weakness.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]