Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 06:54 PM Mar 2016

1985 Rock Hudson's telegraph to Reagans pleading for help. The answer was no.

Nancy Reagan Turned Down Rock Hudson’s Plea For Help Nine Weeks Before He Died



Although only a handful of people knew it, Hudson was in Paris desperately seeking treatment for AIDS — treatment that even a prominent, wealthy actor could not get in the United States in 1985.

Although more than 5,500 people had died from the disease by the start of 1985, the government had taken few significant steps toward addressing the disease — with the Reagan administration recommending a $10 million cut in AIDS spending down to $86 million in its federal budget proposal released in February 1985.

And so, Hudson traveled to France, hoping to see Dr. Dominique Dormant, a French army doctor who had secretly treated him for AIDS the past fall. Dormant, though, was unable to get the actor transferred to the military hospital. Initially, the doctor wasn’t even able to get permission to see Hudson at the American Hospital.

....“Only one hospital in the world can offer necessary medical treatment to save life of Rock Hudson or at least alleviate his illness,” Olson wrote. Although the commanding officer had denied Hudson admission to the French military hospital initially, Olson wrote that they believed “a request from the White House … would change his mind.”

First Lady Nancy Reagan turned down the request.


74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1985 Rock Hudson's telegraph to Reagans pleading for help. The answer was no. (Original Post) madfloridian Mar 2016 OP
How completely chilling farleftlib Mar 2016 #1
How did she 'misspeak to THIS degree? To get things so completely WRONG? AzDar Mar 2016 #3
It's why there's so much outrage. The Reagan WH showed contempt toward the crisis. madfloridian Mar 2016 #4
Right. My point being she has either lied egregiously again, or she has AGAIN fundamentally AzDar Mar 2016 #7
Agree very much. madfloridian Mar 2016 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author DUbeornot2be Mar 2016 #33
I was thinking the same thing. madfloridian Mar 2016 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author DUbeornot2be Mar 2016 #42
She LIED. Or she's a complete buffoon. Fearless Mar 2016 #44
^ This. AzDar Mar 2016 #57
She says it was a simple mistake 6chars Mar 2016 #55
Which is also why she voted for the Iraq War... she DIDN'T research the facts! Fearless Mar 2016 #58
I don't think that is why 6chars Mar 2016 #59
Did Bernie? Kennedy? Fearless Mar 2016 #60
Nope. 6chars Mar 2016 #61
So I stand with Kennedy over Hillary. It's not that complicated. Fearless Mar 2016 #63
I opposed the vote. 6chars Mar 2016 #64
It was an easy decision to oppose it. She had the ability to see the evidence Fearless Mar 2016 #65
Cold and heartless. Exactly the way Nancy behaved toward a group of disabled kids appalachiablue Mar 2016 #21
read Nancy by that scary biographer, kitty Kelly. it gives the 411 roguevalley Mar 2016 #25
Kick (nt) bigwillq Mar 2016 #2
Fair weather friends...Rock Hudson with Reagans at WH in happier times. madfloridian Mar 2016 #5
Ahh yes, at a point in his life when he could still be a "contributor". CincyDem Mar 2016 #8
Funny things was... Everyone knew Rock Hudson was gay back in the 70s & 80s. TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #14
That's how they treated Rock Hudson. Octafish Mar 2016 #6
They were his friends until he really needed them. madfloridian Mar 2016 #22
If that's how they treat their friends, imagine how they treat their enemies? Octafish Mar 2016 #41
I was appalled when he was elected, with the help of Democrats noiretextatique Mar 2016 #49
That lawn jockey is offensive. madfloridian Mar 2016 #71
Most telling of the Occupants within. It shows a remarkable disdain for the Other. Octafish Mar 2016 #72
Shocking, and I do mean SHOCKING video of Reagan WH Press Briefing On AIDS (1982) I posted... AzDar Mar 2016 #9
I guess I will give in and watch this now. m-lekktor Mar 2016 #12
I saw that, it's embarrassing and shameful. madfloridian Mar 2016 #13
OMG. AzDar Mar 2016 #16
Good on that reporter . . . and fuck the clowns laughing it up in the peanut gallery. Ed Suspicious Mar 2016 #29
Thanks for this and all of your posts. This is interesting stuff. nt m-lekktor Mar 2016 #11
It's like looking back and not believing. madfloridian Mar 2016 #15
yes somebody posted the video to this in this thread and I watched it for the first time. m-lekktor Mar 2016 #17
I remember my fellow teachers laughing about this at the lunch table at school. madfloridian Mar 2016 #18
So heartbreaking. There are many of us on this site who remember all too well MerryBlooms Mar 2016 #19
"And the Band Played On" book and movie available. madfloridian Mar 2016 #20
Huge kick and rec. love_katz Mar 2016 #23
and remember Ronnie was a pedophile... griloco Mar 2016 #24
There seems to be no proof of that. I would leave that alone. madfloridian Mar 2016 #28
proof? proof? repubs don't need no stinkin' proof griloco Mar 2016 #45
I was mostly referring to... madfloridian Mar 2016 #62
i go with the broad definition-- griloco Mar 2016 #66
I don't alert, but I don't think you should use rapist and pedophile describing Reagan. madfloridian Mar 2016 #67
him 36 her 15. how would you describe him? griloco Mar 2016 #68
methinks I'll take Liz at her word... griloco Mar 2016 #46
Good lord! Does the Presidency require a casting off of one's humanity? Ed Suspicious Mar 2016 #26
A resurgence of burning hatred of this evil couple. Amimnoch Mar 2016 #27
Yes, the Clinton administration started to take definitive steps... Kensan Mar 2016 #38
When Governor of California, Regan closed all the mental institutions in the state and JFKDem62 Mar 2016 #30
Yep. First he wrecked CA, then the nation. SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #31
Yes the death, destruction, misery Reagan/ Bush caused is unbelievable. Now they are seen as saints. JFKDem62 Mar 2016 #32
True jerks and low-information voters. SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #36
It also illustrates how easily history can be written and people fall for it. JFKDem62 Mar 2016 #69
No one talks about that senseandsensibility Mar 2016 #47
Yes, the memories are still there. Jarqui Mar 2016 #34
I know him only from his courage in this respect and his movies, SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #37
Me, too. And I loved Giant with him and Elizabeth Taylor. madfloridian Mar 2016 #39
One of my favorite films. closeupready Mar 2016 #51
My mom absolutely loved them too. (heck, she made us all watch them) Jarqui Mar 2016 #70
And now his image and reputation are far, far greater. SusanCalvin Mar 2016 #74
But Hill senseandsensibility Mar 2016 #48
Recommend for Truth! KoKo Mar 2016 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author DUbeornot2be Mar 2016 #43
K & R !!! WillyT Mar 2016 #50
K & R RepubliCON-Watch Mar 2016 #52
I had no idea. As an earlier post, chilling. 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #53
I try to avoid using profanity Aerows Mar 2016 #54
Hillary Clinton, Nancy Reagan, and AIDS slipslidingaway Mar 2016 #56
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Mar 2016 #73
 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
1. How completely chilling
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 06:57 PM
Mar 2016

How cold and heartless can you be to deny a friend's dying plea for help because of his sexual orientation?

Hillary's hero!

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
3. How did she 'misspeak to THIS degree? To get things so completely WRONG?
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 07:05 PM
Mar 2016

Is there something seriously WRONG with her?

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
7. Right. My point being she has either lied egregiously again, or she has AGAIN fundamentally
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 07:13 PM
Mar 2016

misunderstood an important event/subject. Either thing should disqualify her...

Response to AzDar (Reply #3)

Response to madfloridian (Reply #40)

6chars

(3,967 posts)
55. She says it was a simple mistake
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 03:04 AM
Mar 2016

My guess is that this is part of the story.

Possibility: An aide probably prepared comments for her to read, since she is busy campaigning and what not, and it's not like she was close friends with Nancy. And the aide totally screwed it up. And after the comments and the criticism of the comments, Hillary is apologizing but doesn't want to blame the aide.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
59. I don't think that is why
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 03:32 AM
Mar 2016

The majority of Democratic senators voted for it - Kerry, Biden, etc.

While it is impossible to read someone's mind, my best guess is the majority of those senators voted that way because Bush was on a roll and they didn't want the fallout of voting against it, either in their districts or for future possible plans. The evidence of WMD was not compelling, as those of us paying attention at the time could clearly see. However, I do not think it was clear at the time just how badly it would play out - that was a surprise (albeit one made worse by mismanagement). If it had been clear how badly it would play out, more of the Democratic senators would have opposed the vote.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
61. Nope.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 03:56 AM
Mar 2016

Bernie was in congress, not the senate, but anyway, in the senate about 28 Dems voted for it and about 23 did not.

I think a vote on the merits would have been "no evidence, at least some risk. let's not do it."

Instead a typical vote of the 28 dems was "weak evidence but not much risk, I am not going to spend political capital opposing this."

But it is a logical error to now go back and assume the 28 were thinking "no evidence, and this will lead to total disaster for the US. Let's do it anyway." Few if any predicted it would go as badly as it did.

If the result had been more like that of the first Iraq war - which basically turned out pretty well as wars go from the US perspective, we wouldn't be having the same conversation.



6chars

(3,967 posts)
64. I opposed the vote.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:41 AM
Mar 2016

My point isn't that the vote was justified. But it just wasn't as unjustified as hindsight makes it.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
65. It was an easy decision to oppose it. She had the ability to see the evidence
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:44 AM
Mar 2016

She chose not to look at it. And voted for the war.

I didn't need their evidence, I knew it was wrong.

It was an easy decision on my part.

Very easy.

appalachiablue

(41,103 posts)
21. Cold and heartless. Exactly the way Nancy behaved toward a group of disabled kids
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 09:03 PM
Mar 2016

a colleague at work told me. It was Spring, 1981 while I was an intern at a museum in DC through my university. I remember exactly what the coordinator in charge of the children's art program told us about an outing she and other staff went on to accompany an excited group of kids, students in her class who were selected to attend a special White House ceremony. The new First Lady, Nancy Reagan came out and immediately looked at the handicapped kids with a visible expression of horror and distain. As if to say, what is this, am I expected to deal with these creatures? A despicable response I can't envision coming from Eleanor Roosevelt, Jackie Kennedy, Lady Bird Johnson, Betty Ford, Rosalynn Carter, Michelle Obama or Jill Biden.

But that pair, Ronnie and Nancy were monsters, ultra conservative ones. Yesterday's thoughtless, reckless blunder about Nancy Reagan and Aids by Hillary Clinton is causing many of us connected to family and friends who faced HIV/Aids to relive a lot of painful memories. The struggle and suffering, our own loss and justified anger about the homophobic ridicule and delay in funding research by the Reagan administration. Before he died in 1992 during the height of the Aids crisis, my little brother traveled to France for treatment in addition to the care he received in NYC we later learned. Very ugly, these people. Individuals in power who make decisions over life and death. And tragic mistakes, with consequences.

CincyDem

(6,336 posts)
8. Ahh yes, at a point in his life when he could still be a "contributor".
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 07:14 PM
Mar 2016

Lying on a deathbed in Paris, not so much.

Typical.

TheBlackAdder

(28,167 posts)
14. Funny things was... Everyone knew Rock Hudson was gay back in the 70s & 80s.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 07:30 PM
Mar 2016

.


The Reagans and the Secret Service definitely knew he was gay too.

So that makes Nancy Reagan even more of a two-faced 'friend!"


.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
22. They were his friends until he really needed them.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 09:18 PM
Mar 2016

I can remember when I first read about that I just plain felt sad for him.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
41. If that's how they treat their friends, imagine how they treat their enemies?
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 12:48 AM
Mar 2016

And in the process, made white power, hate and racial superiority all the rage.



In 1980, Reagan declared his candidacy in Philadelphia, Mississippi, the "community" where three Civil Rights marchers were murdered in cold blood.



Reagan, White As Snow

by Alec Dubro
www.tompaine.com/, May 13, 2007

EXCERPT...

Domestically, he opposed every legislative remedy for African Americans, betraying a meanness of spirit and an open racism. As Sidney Blumenthal wrote in The Guardian in 2003:

Reagan opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, opposed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (calling it "humiliating to the South&quot , and ran for governor of California in 1966 promising to wipe the Fair Housing Act off the books. "If an individual wants to discriminate against Negroes or others in selling or renting his house," he said, "he has a right to do so." After the Republican convention in 1980, Reagan traveled to the county fair in Neshoba, Mississippi, where, in 1964, three Freedom Riders had been slain by the Ku Klux Klan. Before an all-white crowd of tens of thousands, Reagan declared: "I believe in states' rights."

It's hard to believe now, but in 1965, a higher percentage of congressional Republicans voted for the Voting Rights Act than Democrats. Reagan, then, wasn't following party tradition; he was making a grab for the white racist vote-and it worked. Southern Democrats abandoned the party en masse for one more welcoming to white supremacy. No wonder so many loved, and still love, the man: He validated people's whiteness.

It's true that Reagan knew enough to occasionally disguise his racism. He appointed Samuel Pierce to head the Department of Housing and Urban Development, where Pierce presided over the halving of housing subsidies. No matter. Reagan couldn't remember the man's name. Once, at a reception for the nation's mayors, he greeted Pierce with a '"Hello, Mr. Mayor." Despite this, a few black conservatives, such as Armstrong Williams, were willing to validate him as someone who knew better than the "civil rights establishment" what was good for African Americans.

But it was in foreign affairs that he showed that he could rise above mere opportunism and flaunt his racism for all the world to see. He was the best friend that South Africa's apartheid government had in the developed world.

CONTINUED...

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Ronald_Reagan/Reagan_WhiteAsSnow.html



When President, he allowed his staff to refer to the slain civil rights leader as "Martin Lucifer Coon."



Anybody wonder who he meant when he conflated "food-stamps, vodka, Cadillacs, and welfare queens"?

Anybody wonder why the United States has rotted from the head down?

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
49. I was appalled when he was elected, with the help of Democrats
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 02:09 AM
Mar 2016

His "Make America Great Again" slogan was a thinly-veiled appeal to white resentment about civil rights, affirmative action, and the general inclusion of POC is what used to be whites only arenas in society. I also remember the country changed overnight when he was elected. People were meaner and more overtly racist...I felt it and saw it. I was just graduating from college, and trying to find a job. I still remember how the same people I talked to who were so excited on the phone reacted when I showed up Black. Horrible times. He was worse than Bush. Not by much, but worse.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
71. That lawn jockey is offensive.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 01:44 PM
Mar 2016

I saw one of those once years ago, was surprised to see one in his picture.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
72. Most telling of the Occupants within. It shows a remarkable disdain for the Other.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 02:02 PM
Mar 2016

Ronald Reagan did not care for people who are not White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants. And it shows in the nation he and his ideological successors have left behind.

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
9. Shocking, and I do mean SHOCKING video of Reagan WH Press Briefing On AIDS (1982) I posted...
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 07:16 PM
Mar 2016

yesterday...


m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
12. I guess I will give in and watch this now.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 07:20 PM
Mar 2016

I haven't really had the stomach for it so far whenever i have seen it posted here or elsewhere.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
13. I saw that, it's embarrassing and shameful.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 07:21 PM
Mar 2016

Here's some more terrible ridicule and laughter in public. Even shocked Mitterand and his wife.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027675048

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
29. Good on that reporter . . . and fuck the clowns laughing it up in the peanut gallery.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 09:37 PM
Mar 2016

Also fuck the press Secretary, and fuck that administration.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
17. yes somebody posted the video to this in this thread and I watched it for the first time.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:01 PM
Mar 2016

It was bad. I just glanced at the transcript to it in the link you posted. It was a big joke "did you say FAIRIES?" geesh. and to think I was gay and in the US Navy back then hoping I wasn't going to test positive because they were about to make HIV testing mandatory and I had never been tested yet in the military and if you tested positive you were immediately whisked away for discharge. I saw a few of my fellow shipmates abruptly disappeared like that. I wasn't watching these press conferences back then. I didn't watch much tv during those days. What a time to live through. I tell you I dreaded waiting for the results of my very first HiV test while simultaneously being in the military. I had no idea what to expect for a result. I can't believe I tested negative. I was and am lucky. Those were the days nobody knew we had to be "safe" until it was too late for many of us.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
18. I remember my fellow teachers laughing about this at the lunch table at school.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:06 PM
Mar 2016

It was all a big joke to most of them. I was raised Southern Baptist, but my parents taught us from early on to care about other human beings. I was appalled at the attitudes of the teachers then, actually shocked that they were so callous.

The Reagans did not set a good example for our country in this area.

MerryBlooms

(11,757 posts)
19. So heartbreaking. There are many of us on this site who remember all too well
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:15 PM
Mar 2016

what was happening. The thousands lost, the pain of losing those close to us, the frustration with the administration... it was an absolute horror.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
62. I was mostly referring to...
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:00 AM
Mar 2016

the use of the word pedophile. There is no doubt they all slept around, but I just objected to use of that word.

griloco

(832 posts)
66. i go with the broad definition--
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:44 AM
Mar 2016

Way overage of consent with underage. We could also go
with child rapist. Reagan devotees (who are all superly moral Christians) can argue semantics if they wish.

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
27. A resurgence of burning hatred of this evil couple.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 09:33 PM
Mar 2016

When these 2 creatures KNEW that there was a virus, and KNEW it was killing people and CHOSE to be silent.. They chose to do nothing.

Across the country, and especially in metropolitan areas, people were dying, not even knowing what the hell it was that was killing them. Many times alone, and afraid.. wasting away in a variety of horrendous ways from opportunistic diseases/conditions that by all logic should not be killing them.

If there is any kind of afterlife, these 2 deserve nothing more than the worst that it has to offer.

I know Hillary has apologized for this.
I know that their administration was the first to really take steps to boost up the funding for research, and promote awareness.
I can understand why Hillary did attend... that woman's.. funeral out of duty and expectation as a living former first lady.
Being that it was a funeral, I even forgive keeping the message positive about this despicable woman..

I want more though. I want an explanation how she could have made such a horrendous gaffe.. Was she really that oblivious to the Reagan complacency in the death of so many?

The primary's over now in my state. I've stopped my monthly donation to her campaign. I still have all the same misgivings about the Sanders campaign, but no longer have the appetite to actively support her.

So.. for the rest of this campaign season.. I'll put my focus and little bit of extra $$ I can muster up to helping get Republicans out of Congress.

Kensan

(180 posts)
38. Yes, the Clinton administration started to take definitive steps...
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:53 PM
Mar 2016

but they got an assist. And it came from the greatest point guard of all time, Ervin "Magic" Johnson. When he announced he was retiring due to contracting HIV, it sent shock waves around the world. More than a decade after the first reported cases and tens of thousand dead, it took a famous playboy athlete (who was undoubtedly heterosexual) to really shine a light on this epidemic. Advances in medicines and treatment started receiving much more funding and attention. Different cocktails of drugs were used to slow the advance of the disease in the hopes a more effective cure would be discovered in a few years.

I knew 2 men who died of this disease, both from tainted blood transfusions received after serious auto accidents. They went through an ordeal trying to heal their bodies from the accidents, and both thought they were lucky to be alive. Months later, they were wasting away. Facing their impending deaths (since AIDS was a death sentence at the time), I still recall the stares they would receive in public and the "whispered" comments after you passed by about how they must be gay and deserved their fate.

Both of my friends were happily married, and died in their low 30's leaving behind devastated wives, children and friends. The Reagans and all the ultra-religious folks were cheerleading this disease, since in their twisted minds it validated their views about homosexuality. What they did can never be forgotten, nor can it be white-washed to play "nice" at a solemn occasion.

What Hillary did was inexcusable, and her second attempt at an apology still doesn't address Nancy Reagan's role in this history. Hillary will always play the politician, and won't impugn Nancy's legacy/reputation. Years from now, some f**king elementary school history book will have multiple chapters devoted to all the ways the Reagans saved America, and defeating AIDS will be right after Raygun single-handedly broke the Soviet Union and tore down the Berlin Wall. I wonder what monuments will be left to name after Nancy, since almost everything will have already been named after St. Ronnie of the Fourth Circle of Hell.

JFKDem62

(383 posts)
30. When Governor of California, Regan closed all the mental institutions in the state and
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 09:44 PM
Mar 2016

mentally ill people were literally living in the streets.
It was criminal.

JFKDem62

(383 posts)
32. Yes the death, destruction, misery Reagan/ Bush caused is unbelievable. Now they are seen as saints.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 09:52 PM
Mar 2016

A total disgrace.

JFKDem62

(383 posts)
69. It also illustrates how easily history can be written and people fall for it.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:51 AM
Mar 2016

Despite the facts staring them in the face.

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
34. Yes, the memories are still there.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:22 PM
Mar 2016

Rock Hudson coming out was a big deal in a very homophobic society.

He could have crawled off and died with his reputation in tact. His reputation in the short term took a pretty big hit.

Rock put a famous face on AIDS. When folks found out, suddenly funding took off, celebrities started to take calls to support it, etc. A whole bunch changed for the better in dealing with the disease.

Turning down the above email, joking about AIDS in the White House press conference, etc - it's kind of hard to believe people could be so callous and cruel.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
37. I know him only from his courage in this respect and his movies,
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:50 PM
Mar 2016

but I really feel he must have been a fine, fine person.

I know Rock Hudson and Doris Day is a cliche, but I *love* those movies.

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
70. My mom absolutely loved them too. (heck, she made us all watch them)
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:51 AM
Mar 2016

And even though I wasn't a gigantic fan, those are pleasant family memories.

I had helped a gay effort in 1974 or so and didn't have the guts to put my name to it. I was well acquainted with some of the issues he must have grappled with and to me, that was his greatest moment - my respect for him grew immensely. His self sacrifice of the reputation of this "image" we all had of him helped a lot of people.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
74. And now his image and reputation are far, far greater.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 03:01 PM
Mar 2016

There's a lesson in there I think.

I appreciate him so much.

Response to madfloridian (Original post)

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
53. I had no idea. As an earlier post, chilling.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 02:29 AM
Mar 2016

Heartbreaking. Where is the humanity?
Sick at heart.
Tired of reliving it all......

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
54. I try to avoid using profanity
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 02:32 AM
Mar 2016

There is no fucking way I could actually express my thoughts without getting myself banned.

Livid doesn't cover it.

Incandescent with rage might get close.

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
56. Hillary Clinton, Nancy Reagan, and AIDS
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 03:08 AM
Mar 2016
http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/hillary-clinton-nancy-reagan-and-aids

"It will take somebody with more psychiatric sophistication than me to figure out how Hillary Clinton could have come to praise Ronald and Nancy Reagan, as she initially did earlier today, for having started the American conversation about AIDS “when, before, nobody talked about it.”

President Reagan’s first speech on the subject wasn’t until May 31, 1987. By then, more than twenty-five thousand people, the majority of them gay men, had died in the United States. His Administration ridiculed people with AIDS—his spokesman, Larry Speakes, made jokes about them at press conferences—and while I do think it rude to speak ill of the dead, particularly on the day of a funeral, this issue cannot be ignored. Nancy Reagan refused to act in any way in 1985 to help her friend Rock Hudson when he was in Paris dying of AIDS. (Last year, Buzzfeed published documents that make this clear.)


.....In the end, as Clinton wrote, Nancy Reagan was indeed “strong” on stem-cell research and on Alzheimer’s disease. Her conversion came when her husband plunged into the darkness of the disease. She was desperate, and would have done anything for him. It was a deeply admirable stance, and rare in her conservative world. Millions of other people, however, would surely have benefitted from that kind of support—had she offered it when her husband was capable of doing something to help alleviate so much suffering."



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»1985 Rock Hudson's telegr...