2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumChicago Tribune: "Hillary can't win. She's the establishment candidate in year of insurgency."
link to Hillary can't win. She's the establishment candidate in year of insurgency; excerpt:
Hillary Clinton, with her massive fundraising, her Democratic Party insider status, the Wall Street speeches bringing more cash, the Clinton Foundation clout, the connections foreign and domestic... is the political embodiment of the establishment. And that spells serious trouble for her, because the American people are in an insurgent mood, fueled by the holes in their bank accounts, all those jobs Bill Clinton sent overseas with his support of NAFTA, and the rifts in what we once called the common culture. It spreads across class lines like fire in a dry riverbed. It won't stop until the weeds are gone.... But the Democrat... turnout in primaries is low. ... She has other problems, including the consensus from primary exit polls that she's considered to be a liar. Young women don't like her much, perhaps because Clinton's old feminist allies tried to shame them into submission. Now Hillary is thought of as some angry grandmother.
She seems overly scripted, stuffy, tired, as if every word she speaks has been poll-tested and run past criminal lawyers. ... Even Democrats who aren't excited by Clinton say that she deserves the nomination.... But Clint Eastwood explained all you need to know about the deserving to a dying Gene Hackman in the Oscar-winning western "Unforgiven." Hackman, shot and on the ground, said he didn't deserve to go that way.
"Deserve's got nothin' to do with it," Eastwood told him.... Deserves have nothing to do with power politics. Timing is everything. And I don't see Hillary winning, because she's the wrong candidate at the wrong time.
Not a fan, but I cannot pass up a good quote from "Unforgiven."
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)"What's Deserve, got to do, got to do with it..."
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Love that woman. (Tina is great too.)
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)On that Tina Turner tune, I find it "playing" in my head fairly often. In the grocery counter line, at the post office, here and there and the other place.
I don't think it's the best composition ever. But she sings it like it was.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)figure 100,000 excess deaths a year, (excess deaths amenable to improved health care) thats the cost of letting scammers in high places delay resolution of the problem with solutions KNOWN TO WORK with lies for 20 years while they tried to negotiate GATS - and repeatedly failed because countries refused to dump their beloved public services even as the small print in trade deals sealed their fates.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)not involved in any of that.
I could be wrong.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)That the state of health care it is not Tina Turner's fault!
Samantha
(9,314 posts)I can back you up on that.
Sam
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)Thanks, Sam. I hope people realize I'm not disparaging Tina Turner. She strikes me as a notably self-directed soul.
I just don't think she's all that complicit in world political scandals.
I hope all's well your way. 'Am hoping for some good news indeed this evening in some of these primary states. Go, Bernie!
peacebird
(14,195 posts)She is clearly unelectable.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)I guess her campaign is frantically trying to find one that is still palatable to the 2016 voter.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)C Moon
(12,212 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Cavallo
(348 posts)warhawk and excepting funding from private prisons. She'll also help with regulation to get people locked up easier and more often which is what the private prison lobby she was taking money from is lobbying for.
sorechasm
(631 posts)As if the voters were mere cogs in Hillary's war machine that needed adjustment. They must think we're imbeciles to fall for it.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)using trade deals which are basically lawyers tricks.
Bernie's platform, pretending GATS and WTO don't exist, is brilliant.
Cavallo
(348 posts)Bernie Sanders: Withdraw from the WTO Now! (6/8/2005)
He's spoken about the latest trade agreement. For his relatively little time in the news, I don't think he should be digging out all trade agreements but sticking on topic about what people are focusing on right now.
There's plenty on Gats and Bernie too:
https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=AwrT6VrjQudWlIEAPYQnnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTEyaDMwbTNqBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDQjE1OTJfMQRzZWMDc2M-?p=Bernie+Sanders+Gats+Walmart&fr=yhs-mozilla-005&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-005
Unlike Hillary, Bernie sanders is against these things when it's not Campaign season.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)if the FTAs pass, elections can't matter.
they are designed to take everything of economic value off the table.
Look what happened in Slovakia
What would be the point of putting all these billions of man hours into trade deals if their binding requirements could be nullified by a piddly election and 'politics'.
Its not like that any more. Corporate rule means corporations rule.
Cavallo
(348 posts)hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)poor people out of their homes.
MADem
(135,425 posts)They lean well right-the only reason they endorsed BHO is because he was a local and they thought it was good for the city/state. They were great fans of George W. Bush. I've got to laugh at some of the definitions in the piece, certainly.
Someone who has been collecting a government paycheck for 33 years is now classified as an "insurgent?"
And quoting Clint "Talk to the Chair" Eastwood?
Sounds like creative writing to me....
See--Hillary CAN win. And here's why:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/14/why-hillary-clintons-delegate-lead-over-bernie-sanders-is-bigger-than-it-looks/
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Funny, they refused to endorse anyone from several state wide offices or local offices from the GOP.
MADem
(135,425 posts)All politics is local, and that is her birthplace.
The IL connection trumps party lines. Pardon the use of the word "trump" -- that jerk is ruining a perfectly good word, I'm afraid.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)She is their candidate.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)himself who's personally a bit of an ass, right?
I said I'm not a fan of Chicago Tribune editorials, but it is a thoughtful commentary and the analysis was spot-on.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He demonstrated to all that he is a right wing lunatic with his Chair Dissertation at the GOP convention.
He's not a hero--he's an old BUFFOON.
smh!
I mean, come on--Hitler loved dogs, but we don't make him the spokesmodel for the ASPCA....
Sorry for the Godwin reference, but that's how dumb it is to use "Clint Eastwood" on a Democratic board for ANY reason.
You're new, though. Maybe you don't remember this...but many of your fellow DUers do.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021240187
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)It's a good movie. The movie was being quoted.
Do you also think that only creepy men like Woody Allen movies or Roman Polanski movies? I hope not because I love their movies notwithstanding the fact that I won't defend their personal life choices and conduct. Likewise, I am not prohibited from enjoying "The Unforgiven" simply because Clint Eastwood turned nasty in his senility.
MADem
(135,425 posts)in judgment.
How many times do I have to repeat this?
And bringing in Woody "Child Molester" Allen or his partner in crime Polanski to bolster your point?
Keep digging.
"Enjoy" all you want, but don't go dragging that asshole up in here and holding him out to be some kind of icon. And don't think you can call what he said at the RNC convention a product of "senility." It was utter LOATHING that drove him, loathing of one of the best Presidents we've ever had, who has operated under constant assault during his two terms.
So screw Clint Eastwood--he is no example to us, for ANY reason.
smh.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)playing a fictional character by reading lines he did not even write, and you think that Eastwood's right-wing senility taints, the movie in which he appeared, and thus taints the editorial which quotes the movie, and thus taints me because I quoted the editorial, and this all taints DU.
Who else is on the list of people so villainous that we cannot quote newspapers who quote movies in which they appear as fictional characters reading lines which they did not write?
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)by those standards, HC should be toast based on her relationships with the BUsh's, Kissinger, etc, etc, etc...
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)role model before posting a reference to the Twilight Zone: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_Serling
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)you know how they just make it up over there at wiki...lol
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Keep pushing, though! Double down on your right wing editorial, written by a right-wing journalist, "lionizing" an addled actor who is, owing to his tough guy, gun nut movie persona, adored by the right wing!
Who else? Why....Sea lions!
Don't quote obvious right wing sources, at least without explaining why you're using them (like, perhaps, to illustrate what idiots the right wing can be)--there's a start.
Most Democrats know this already.
Marr
(20,317 posts)A writer who references a line from a Clint Eastwood cowboy movie is betraying their true conservative stripes... but a Secretary of State who cites Henry Kissinger as a personal mentor is fine?
You might want to re-read these things before you hit 'post'.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He's drumming up support for the guy that HE believes--rightly or wrongly--is the easiest for his conservative favorite to defeat.
It's not rocket science!
And, to quote YOU:
You might want to re-read these things before you hit 'post'.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Definition number five here:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/betray?o=O
So again, you think quoting a cowboy movie means something, but openly describing Kissinger as a personal mentor means nothing.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Not sure why you're having a tough time with this concept. It's as old as ancient fables.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Vote2016
(1,198 posts)to fully appreciate but I'm scared it's not.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)But that being said I still get into an infrequent "discussion" with that one when I am having a moment of weakness.
there is no winning, only frustration.
MADem
(135,425 posts)50. Some on DU aren't worth "communicating with" if you know what I mean.
But that being said I still get into an infrequent "discussion" with that one when I am having a moment of weakness.
there is no winning, only frustration.
That's a keeper.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I will say that it is encouraging to me that it is not merely a difference of opinion that separates the two factions on DU, but a vast chasm on how to view the world, evaluate evidence, and inspect biases.
It is personally heartening to me that many Bernie supporters are on the right side of this divide.
MADem
(135,425 posts)58. Utterly bizarre exchange
I will say that it is encouraging to me that it is not merely a difference of opinion that separates the two factions on DU, but a vast chasm on how to view the world, evaluate evidence, and inspect biases.
It is personally heartening to me that many Bernie supporters are on the right side of this divide.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Marc J. Hetherington;Jonathan D. Weiler. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics
It will be a critical read as the two parties realign, or one of them finally goes away. Not an easy slog... but easier than city budgets... so there is that.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)The Pasadena public library does not have it, but i was able to request it at no cost through my university library. The perks of being in school!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)started to go though it. I have a few others that if you want i can recommend. Anything by Ornstein and polarization is a must imho.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)It is one of the few political books which seems most prescient this cycle. Chris Hayes has been talking it up recently because I don't even think he knew how well it would predict the arc of both parties this cycle. I have to recommend Aaron Swartz's book review as it alone is worth the read:
http://crookedtimber.org/2012/06/18/guest-review-by-aaron-swartz-chris-hayes-the-twilight-of-the-elites/
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Oldie but goodie, none does it like Hunter Thomson ever did, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas...And it is a good intro to wha ails us,
National Security, Double Government by Michael Glennon... a must to understand why it matters not who gets elected, foreign affairs seem to continue unabated
Naomi Klein, both, This Changes Everyting and The Shock Doctrine.
Picketty's Capital is a tour de force. (And a hard one as well)
And I just gave you a lot of very heavy reading.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and did a review of it... it was... a project
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)I suppose we can't ask "is this as good as it gets" without getting a barrage of crap for the character that Nicholson played in that movie, either.
The fact is -- she doesn't deserve it, just because she thinks she deserves it.
And that was the frickin' point!!
greatauntoftriplets
(175,733 posts)To see him quoted here is laughable.
MADem
(135,425 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,733 posts)To my knowledge, he's never had anything good to say about Democrats. His columns about President Obama have been disgusting.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)To see either quoted here as liberals is laughable, but at least Bernie didn't pay Kass to write that article!!!
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I really don't think so.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)Somehow, I just dont think she can keep the lid on all the issues.
they are just waiting until its sure she's the nominee to let them loose.
Response to MADem (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MADem
(135,425 posts)OH, IL, NC, FL, and MO.
It was a great day!
The author of that piece shouldn't think a career in prognostication is in the cards.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)They're going to cost us all dearly. I really hope enough Bernie supporters show up to outnumber them.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)That is unusual today. Good on them!
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)jalan48
(13,863 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)and conclusions derived from them may be summarily dismissed as balderdash
lol
senz
(11,945 posts)Funny, that.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)on how credible the insurgent is by November.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)She wants desperately to win. She's endured painful decades of Bill, years of Barack, eating all the insults like so many sins and swallowing them down as the price of her ambition. It's all there in the dull weight of her eyes.
Jarqui
(10,123 posts)It depends on who the GOP nominate.
But I think there is some merit to their opinion in that people wanted change with Obama and they still want more change. Therefore, someone like Ciinton is handicapped because there is no getting around the fact that she, no matter what she says, is not a real change candidate.
I don't know if that will cost her the election.
If she is up against a candidate with no political background, she's at a disadvantage on that issue.
In Trumps case, he's even more unpopular than Hillary so Hillary may well prevail over the disadvantage from being the establishment candidate.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)it must be snowing in hell, and them polls must really be showing something.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Not all "journalists" are created equal.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)PatrickforO
(14,572 posts)If our nominee is Bernie, he will win.
If it is Clinton, Trump will win.
Sad, but I'm convinced it is true.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Oh and that "Clinton Foundation clout"?
I say, investigate the living hell out of that thing!
No...More...Clintons...EVER!
Martin Eden
(12,864 posts)I take their opinions with heavy grains of salt.
brooklynite
(94,519 posts)Martin Eden
(12,864 posts)Didn't realize at first glance it was written by the big ass known as John Kass.
Every time I see him on page 2 I am painfully reminded what a huge downgrade he is from Mike Royko.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,733 posts)He's a right winger.
Martin Eden
(12,864 posts)He's like a poor man's version of Charles Krauthammer.
HenryWallace
(332 posts)Kass is an idiot!
He wants all Democrats and/or otherwise progressive candidates to crash and burn.
PS: Last year he wrote a column about his only twin sons leaving from college...... and he screwed it up!
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Greenfield wrote a similar piece yesterday and now this one. They must know the good ship Hillary has been hit below the water line and they're beginning to bale.
They know something.
I'm thinking two things: election numbers, and State Department.
Recoverin_Republican
(218 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Awful.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)as I'm sitting going thru movies mostly classic westerns with James Stewart in them I ran up on my NAS server had that old southern drawl in the narration. Loved it actually. Probably not a fan but yeah Would figure I'm watching classic westerns and poof it ends in a quote from one , thats two I woulda loved seeing together James Stewart and Clint Eastwood. Can't but woulda been fun. yeah sure John Wayne who wouldn't
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)Let's wait until the votes are all counted first, eh? She is.....you know....leading by a healthy margin at present in the primary. Premature BS.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)Ed O'Donnell
Kass have you completely lost any sense of how to construct an opinion piece? Ever hear the word Persuasion?
Its when you refer to facts, rather then disneyesque stereotypes, to make a point. Maybe cut back on the ouzo while at the keyboard next time.
Recoverin_Republican
(218 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)I think she'd be a better President than Sanders, I just don't see how she could win the general this cycle.
Enbver
(7 posts)Lol
Freethinker65
(10,017 posts).....and Trump won Illinois. Enough said
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)wins last night.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Nice. But that's what you guys have been doing--spreading right wing talking points.