2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders admits he took the Democratic name just to suit his ambition to be president
Bernie Sanders on Monday told NBCs Chuck Todd that he ran as a Democrat to get more media coverage.
During a town hall-style event in Columbus, Ohio, the independent Vermont senator said, In terms of media coverage, you have to run within the Democratic Party. He then took a dig at MNSBC, telling Todd, the network would not have me on his program if he ran as an independent.
Money also played a role in his decision to run as a Democrat, Sanders added.
To run as an independent, you need you could be a billionaire," he said. "If you're a billionaire, you can do that. I'm not a billionaire. So the structure of American politics today is such that I thought the right ethic was to run within the Democratic Party.
POLITICO has previously reported that Sanders initially resisted running as a Democrat, but was convinced by his advisers that it was necessary.
read: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/bernie-sanders-2016-inside-213692
...media coverage? So the party is just a stepping stone for his personal ambition to be president. Not very inspiring.
I notice that he's still planning on keeping his independent status if he goes back to the Senate. No wonder so few of his legislative peers choose to line up behind his opportunistic candidacy.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)if that is not democratic, what is?
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)If he had run as an Independent they'd be whining that he's a spoiler.
So he chose to run as a Dem and he's an opportunist.
AFAIC he's more of a Dem than Hillary and I've been a Dem for over 40 years.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)He's been a more reliable liberal/progressive vote than a lot of life long Democrats.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)They completely abandoned the Working class
pandr32
(11,588 posts)Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)Clinton is a fake Democrat, a DINO, a Reaganite in 'liberal' clothing. The rich get richer and 'trickle down' to the rest of us. Har-har-har! That's urinate on the rest of us. So-o-o sorry to be so crude. But that's exactly what it feels like to most people with Clinton's "free trade for the rich," her $200,000 secret Goldman Sachs speeches, and her lo-o-o-o-ong list of donors who screw the American people over every chance they get. Board member of Walmart! Good God!
Sanders is the closest thing to FDR that any of us will ever get to vote for. FDR, Harry Truman, even Dwight Eisenhower (a Republican!) wouldn't have put up with her corporate corruption for a minute. She's not only not a Democrat, in any meaningful sense of the word, she's a transglobalist, making deals all over the planet to our detriment, including an arms deal with Saudi Arabia (where women are slaves) in exchange for big bucks to the Clinton Foundation.
The Democratic Party means absolutely nothing in the hands of the Clintons. THEY are the ones using it as a vehicle for personal gain and power, while fooling people that they are democratic. They serve the oligarchs, not us!
Bernie Sanders, who couldn't stomach this growing corruption in the Democratic Party, remained independent, to his credit, and now claims his rightful place as one of the few Democratic leaders left who actually serves the majority of people and actually believes in the "big tent" party that we used to be. He actually believes in the New Deal's socialist programs like Social Security, fair taxation and strong regulation of the banksters. He actually believes in public participation, in public education, in development of "the Commons," and all the things that created a decent life in this country after the first gang of greedy oligarchs crashed our economy in 1929.
The Clintons tried to undo the New Deal--the same goal as Reagan. They are NOT Democrats! And, by God, they are directly responsible for causing the second Crash. This time, all their rich pals made lots and lots of money, even as they bankrupted the rest of us. And those very uber-rich pals are now their donors!
The Clintons have turned the Democratic Party into the Goldman Sachs Party. It is unrecognizable. And Bernie Sanders is absolutely the right leader to reform it. And I welcome that reform with all my heart!
I canvassed for JFK in 1960, when I was 16. I know what the party was like then. I know what we stood for. What does the Democratic Party stand for now? Nada! It's an empty shell. So let's fill it up again with a candidate we can believe in, and a platform we can believe in, and bring all the people who fled away, or who remained Democrats but have no say, or who are so disgusted they don't vote, or whose unions were busted, or whose union leaders were bought, all the people who work so hard for a living and get less and less, all the young people punished with crushing debt for going to college, bring them all back into our "big tent."
Hillary Clinton can't do that--and doesn't want to. She wants a crown handed to her by us peons. She doesn't stand for anything except personal ambition and greed.
Bernie Sanders is the REAL Democrat!
mythology
(9,527 posts)and said he'd be a hypocrite for running as a Democrat given the things he's said about the party.
That said, I have no problems with him running as a Democratic candidate, I have serious concerns how he's going to answer questions about that in a theoretical general election and how it's going to impact downstream races.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)Bernie Sanders is the most refreshing candidate who has campaigned for president in ages.
Long may he run, many be his delegates, and it's on to Philadelphia.
If the people in his large and enthusiastic audiences did not wish to hear his message, they wouldn't keep packing arenas from one end of the country to the other.
Go, Bernie!
Response to CentralMass (Reply #2)
imari362 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)I am voting for Bernie, not a political party.
Jackilope
(819 posts)He is far and away more of a Democrat than HRC.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)kcr
(15,317 posts)I'm so glad he decided to run as a Dem instead of splitting votes running 3rd party. It's the reason he gets my support while Nader didn't. Even if he doesn't win, his actions will affect more positive change than anyone running 3rd party as a spoiler ever has, in my opinion.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)to me it signifies how a hypocritically we treat the troops, everything for war and death but when they come home,let them live in the streets,
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)... no politician can win without the flag pin!!!
Vattel
(9,289 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)He's got some other thing pinned on his lapel often... maybe it's a communist party pin.
Hell, I don't know....
FreedomRain
(413 posts)nt
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)He knows quality when he sees it.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)And then; all three of my GE ballots as well.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan in particular Mrs. Reagan we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too."
Next, Hillary lauds the Civil Rights efforts of David Duke!
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)--because Boomers remember...
Not saying that younger folks don't agree, but it hit a visceral nerve with Boomers who remember the early HIV/AIDS years vividly.
What Hillary said about Nancy was a prefab untruth of mega proportion.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Granted, my mother and grandmother were in the nursing profession and AIDS effected our daily lives more than the average person, but I do remember it.
I even remember, "And the Band Played On" and how angry the Reagan Administration made me feel.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)You're right--gen xers would remember too...
And now, thx to Hillary, Millennials will also be getting the picture
The Reagan era sucked so bad.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)There isn't a self-serving bone in Sanders' body. None.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)He ran as a Democrat because it IS the only way to get to the oval office and initiate the changes this country desperately needs. He definitely would NOT be on MSNBC if he had run as an Independent. You must be seen on Corporate media to have a hope.
Sanders aligns with Democrats and we support his candidacy. So now he's bad because he is succeeding along that road? Because the voters are coming out for him?
I see, he was supposed to run but not win.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)He clearly has a much better chance of being elected as the Democratic nominee than running as an independent.
He's not taking money from big business or Wall Street to fund his campaign.
And if Sanders had decided to run as an independent candidate you would have engaged in unending mud-slinging attacks against him. Isn't that right?
Plus big business funded PAC's would have financed a huge propaganda campaign against him.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)k8conant
(3,030 posts)op·por·tun·is·tic
ˌäpərt(y)o͞oˈnistik
adjective
exploiting chances offered by immediate circumstances without reference to a general plan or moral principle.
Bernie has a general plan AND moral principle. He is pursuing that with our help.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)Beowulf
(761 posts)He's not like Hillary in that regard. I think he was concerned about the narrow range of ideas being expressed, ideas that were mostly neoliberal and neoconservative. By running as a Democrat he was giving his ideas the best opportunity to be put in front of the American people. And he's being proven correct. His ideas do resonate with large numbers of Americans.
There's no mystery why so few of his peers have endorsed him. The Clintons exert much influence over the big money donors. Crossing the Clintons could mean their ability to raise money takes a huge hit. There's no risk crossing Bernie.
You fundamentally misunderstand Bernie by projecting Hillary onto him. He's a different kind of politician with different motives.
"You fundamentally misunderstand Bernie by projecting Hillary onto him."
ms liberty
(8,580 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)Certainly not in the sense that Hillary does. I believe that Bernie, even as an old fart, took on this
task because he truly believes he can help this country, and beyond, more than any other candidate.
In a country this big, with over 300 million people, it seems bizarre that the choices are between some
crazies on the right, and a Clinton. So Bernie jumped in, not for self-aggrandizement, but because he
REALLY cares. He's been amazing in his stamina.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)I am not sure he expected to be as successful as he has been when he started out.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Would you rather he lie about why he's running as a Democrat?
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Funny, that.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)All those decades in the trenches pretending to be fighting for us - all a clever ruse!
Thank the dog we have you to show us the REAL Bernie Sanders!
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)since M O'M dropped out of the race. I noticed the reek of desperation to bring Bernie down has gotten stronger with each victory. It's as if every day Sanders remains in the race is a thorn in the side.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He's just gotten more desperate because at least when he backed MOM he had an easy time finding positive articles to post about his candidate so it wasn't quite as obvious.
Mighty slim pickings when you support Hillary.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)dchill
(38,505 posts)is to suit her ambition to be president. At least Sanders is telling the truth. At the very least.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)bigtree
(85,998 posts)...reflects reality about their candidate?
The laughter you hear is merely an echo.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Posting anything less fawning than "Bernie's so dreamy" goes straight into the wind here on BU ...
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)But I must say, the whole premise of the OP looks to be a pretty weak-sauce attack on Sanders. It deserves the general ridicule it has received.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)More interesting reading!
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)12 years ago.
Can I stay, or is my loyalty now insufficient?
pkdu
(3,977 posts)party" - Bernie Sanders.
His words - he should own them.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)And refreshes the liberal ideas and principles at the core of why we're all Democrats.
brewens
(13,598 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I will be more than happy to oblige.
berningman
(144 posts)"Media Coverage'
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)thank Sanders volunteers in tomorrow's primary states.
The OP should join me in so doing, because the Sanders campaign has attracted many new people to the process, a great great many of them Democratic voters, and in general Sanders has changed the debate.
So I call on the OP to acknowledge this heightened citizenship in the Sanders volunteers and to acknowledge the campaign that inspired it.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)At the 10:10 mark he explains how he felt then. But saw what was accomplished by running as a Democrat.
The whole video is worth a watch. You'll hear the same themes then as is today:
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)edbermac
(15,941 posts)I was juror 4
On Mon Mar 14, 2016, 11:46 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
You're a sad little man.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1492168
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Nasty and completely unnecessary personal attack. Refute the OP or just leave, the name calling is unnecessary
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Mar 14, 2016, 11:56 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Lol, nope
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Are you kidding? You're a sad little man...that's it? Forgetaboutit...it stays.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Mommy, someone was mean to me on the internet! Boo hoo hoo!
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)...and I'm a little less sad.
I'm really going to be smiling after today.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)about being prez, I think he would have launched his campaign before turning 70.
We had to beg him to run. Viewers and listeners of Thom Hartmann's talk show begged him to run.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)If he had run 3 times as an independent for president and then decided to run as a Democrat, the OP might have a point. But I am pretty sure this is his first time running for president. And like you said, his age suggests that being president is not a long-held ambition. Not that it would be a bad thing if it was, necessarily.
brewens
(13,598 posts)White House!" LOL
jg10003
(976 posts)Leftists can complain on DU and vote for 3rd party candidates forever. But the only way change will occur is by electing a Democrat like Bernie.
dogman
(6,073 posts)Which Independent candidate who is not a billionaire gets media coverage? Did you prefer Nader's 3rd Party run?
jalan48
(13,871 posts)Someone had to be the D.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)You Clinton supporters complain about Nader all the time. Nader hardly pulled any votes. Sanders could crush it. You should be grateful that Bernie decided to run with the Democrats.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Probably calls himself Bernie just to make him sound friendlier, too!
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)You apparently think that, with this label, one acquires traits and characteristics that make them desirable rather than the reverse.
It is clear to me that you are not a serious poster but have become infected with a kind of reflexive hatred.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The nerve of him, firing up Democrats to take the party back from corrupt corporatists!
ConsiderThis_2016
(274 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)another hall, tonight in Chicago, to a decidedly thrilled audience.
He happens to be running as a Democrat in this year's primary election.
Deal with it.
Kall
(615 posts)Like Nader. Oh wait, that's wrong too.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)I wish the other candidate would, too, but frankly, she seems like she fits in more as a "non-crazy Republican" than a real deal Democrat. Which liberal group hasn't she thrown under the bus: labor, LGBT, environmentalists, women (limiting abortion - wtf?) -- whose party is it, anyway?
I guess that is what this primary is all about.
I support Bernie.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)It's what they bring as a candidate that interests me.
And he's right about the structure of American politics. I think he did the right thing.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Those that are it as a means to an end to accomplish things in government and those that see it as a civic club. Those people see it no differently than the Rotary Club or the Kiwanis or the Shriners. They love the meetings, the titles and offices they can hold, the fundraisers, the parties and the joy of belonging to the club. Those that see the party as an exclusive club are never going to understand or appreciate a politician like Bernie Sanders.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)He ran as a Democrat because the two party system has a stranglehold on the power in this country and he would rather not split/spoil the Democratic vote.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)He's just another opportunist trying to hijack a political party. Trump is not the only one.
There's also this:
Sanders has gotten nastier. Does it help explain his staying power?
CHICAGO When Bernie Sanders launched his long-shot bid for the presidency 10 months ago, there were two words that rarely crossed his lips: Hillary Clinton.
Now he cant seem to stop talking about her and not much of what he has to say is very nice.
During a boisterous rally here, the senator from Vermont dinged Clinton for supporting a series of disastrous trade deals. He mocked her for refusing to release transcripts of paid speeches she gave to Wall Street firms. He said she was wrong to vote for the Iraq War in 2002.
The transformation has been stark. Whats less clear is whether Sanderss rhetoric helps explain his lasting power in a nominating contest that appears likely to drag on for weeks, considering the mounting number of victories he has scored in key states.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sanders-has-gotten-nastier-does-it-explain-his-lasting-power/2016/03/13/a9e30ebc-e92c-11e5-b0fd-073d5930a7b7_story.html
He's an ideologue. Promising not to run a negative campaign was just lip service. Then again, he's good about making promises that he will never be able to fulfill.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)The truth is he's been running on RW oppo from Day 1, namely "Clinton Cash," a short-lived bash of the Clinton Foundation, launched the same day that he declared. Some of us can see this plainly but most just don't seem to give a damn.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Becoming a Democrat, after years of criticizing them, is just opportunism. Trump is doing the same to the Republican party, unluckily for them, he seems to be winning the nomination. They won't be able to stop him.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)It's going to be a long race.
Impedimentus
(898 posts)Reminds me of Richard Nixon's campaign against John F. Kennedy.
Why can't we all just get along?
Beacool
(30,250 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)becomes President. Not so sure her chances are much higher than zero as it is now.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)I LOVE his honesty... one of the best things about him.
He's the only reason I came back into this party.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I liked you a hell of a lot better when you were in the O'Malley camp.
Then you had some positive things to say.
When everything becomes damage control for a candidate, that is a political race that is doomed to fail.
I'd like the real bigtree back.
JackBeck
(12,359 posts)And yet when this was pointed out to them, the OP still stands.
Impedimentus
(898 posts)No Surprise here. I'm proud to be in that line of Sander's supporters.
thucythucy
(8,073 posts)And ten or twenty or fifty million more voters like him.
BTW--I despised Ralph Nader for running as a third party spoiler in 2000. Not that I want to uncork that whole can of worms again, but Bernie running as a Democrat in 2016 is fine by me--better than fine, it's awesome.
PS--the whole purpose of a political party is to be "a stepping stone"--or more accurately it's to provide the infrastructure needed to win elections by people who generally agree with the party's platform and principles. What else is a party for, if not that? Some insiders' club, a fraternity, a discussion group?
Or to put it another way--the party exists for the candidates and the people they hope to represent, and not the other way around.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)n/t
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)I mean, if he wants to be president, I guess you go where the candidates can get the publicity. Would you expect him NOT to do that? That would be pretty stupid.
I watched that debate. Funny, Toad thinks he's smart and tried to veer Bernie away from issues into the Trump (gawd more trump on MSNBC!) mess but Bernie caught on real fast and inserted Clinton exactly where Toad thought he was going to say "trump." I loved it. Thank god Bernie didn't have to deal with Mathews. He'd have gotten no words in at all. They all thought the Toad was the clever one. Bernie stalled him at every distraction. We need a smart canny President. Obama is smart but he ain't canny. Bernie? Wow!
BTW, all those "special interest" jabs Toad took when going to commercial spots? Bernie should have commented on the profits for Comcast and suggested to Toad and the young people that Comcast could afford to air one or two less commercials per hour. Yes, they are special interests, aren't they? Toad would have walked right into that one.
We so need you, Bernie
Zira
(1,054 posts)And I consider him a Democrat because he stands for my Democratic values.
I think he's just not part of political corruption that the Democratic party would have gotten into over the years.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)And from the fear-mongering campaign he's running it's pretty clear that he feels no loyalty whatsoever to the Democratic party. Far from it.
p.s. thanks bigtree for keeping it real.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)without Bernie Hillary would already be the sole candidate wouldn't she?
eridani
(51,907 posts)mainer
(12,022 posts)It shows he's not beholden to any machine. He used his noggin, understands that this is a two-party system, and to best serve his country, he became a Democrat.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)he did the Party a HUGE favor.......
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)See which of two had voted more along (D). Kinda stupid to try and hit sanders on being a democrat when you support a RAIN (Republican Except In Name)
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Especially considering he's a better Democrat than most Democrats.
kcr
(15,317 posts)His advisers were smart and convinced him of the right way to go about it. He is smart and listened to them. If only Nader had listened to such good advice. This is how you change the party and make it progressive. It's the only way you can change anything in our two party system right now. He is garnering far more attention for progressive ideals and showing that they can win.