2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Satisfied" Town Hall Former Death Row Inmate Questioner Disagrees With Sec. Clinton - BEAUTIFUL
"Satisfied" Town Hall Former Death Row Inmate Questioner Completely Disagrees With Sec. ClintonBy Heavy Mettle
Tuesday Mar 15, 2016 · 12:12 AM EST
Former Death Row Inmate Ricky Jackson
At yesterdays Town Hall for the democratic candidates, a man who was wrongfully convicted of murder and subsequently spent 39 years in prison, narrowly escaping execution, asked Secretary Clinton about her stance on the death penalty. She gave a long, rambling equivocal answer to which the questioner, Ricky Jackson, responded that he was satisfied.
Supporters of Clinton watching this exchange naturally understood his satisfaction with the answer to mean that he agreed with her. It was very painful watching him asking his question, and he had equal difficulty expressing it, having to compose himself in the middle of it. When Clinton was finished he had a look on his face that didnt appear at all as if he agreed with her, on the contrary it appeared he wanted to get out of there, and the glare of millions on national TV, as fast as possible.
Today he has penned a moving, heartfelt editorial explaining why he believes Sec. Clinton is wrong in her stance on capital punishment. As someone who has been so badly served by his fellow humans, he is demonstrating incredible humanity by giving her a second chance to reconsider.
(I have edited some of the piece, for clarity he and two friends were all convicted)
I said last night that I was "satisfied" with Clinton's answer, but that does not mean I agree with her. While I respect her opinion and her honesty, I completely disagree with her position on the death penalty.
The fact that we too often send innocent people to death row in this country can no longer be debated.
I ought to know. I was one of them.
I came within two months of my execution date but was saved by a lucky technicality -- the court made a mistake filling out the death penalty sentencing paperwork. Bridgeman and Ajamu later escaped death only because the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Ohio's death penalty statute as unconstitutional.
If not for pure luck and chance, none of us would have been alive to see our exoneration nearly 40 years later.
Because of an investigation by the Cleveland Scene newspaper and the Ohio Innocence Project at the University of Cincinnati College of Law, we were vindicated and gained our freedom in November 2014. By that time, I had served 39 years in prison for a murder I didn't commit -- the longest sentence by an innocent person in U.S. history.
I know that the death penalty does not deter. That can no longer be seriously debated.
I also know that it is very expensive at a time when states are struggling financially and many are on the brink of bankruptcy. As an expensive government program with no proven track record of effectiveness, it is, indeed, the proverbial "bridge to nowhere." But I also know that it sends innocent people to death row, and sometimes kills them.
Other innocent inmates -- in fact more than 150 of them -- have been lucky enough to have been exonerated and freed before their execution.
Furthermore, I learned from my time on death row that even the guilty are worthy of salvation.
As an innocent and scared 18-year-old boy sent to death row, it was only the kindness and humanity of death row's guilty, who took me under their collective wing, that kept my sanity and maintained my faith in humanity. These inmates made horrible mistakes, and deserved to be punished, but they are not the animals our criminal justice makes them out to be.
A society should not be judged on how it treats its best, but rather on how it treats is lowest. And even the lowest are capable of incredible acts of humanity and are worthy of decency. They are worthy of God's grace, just as they bestowed grace upon me.
When I asked Clinton why she still supports the death penalty, she said she supported it only for the worst of the worst: those who committed acts of mass killing or terrorism. I cannot accept that.
In cases such as those, the societal pressure to convict is at its highest. And when an intense pressure to convict is present, that is when the risk of convicting an innocent is greatest.
The death penalty is also not a deterrent in terrorism cases. In fact, death can serve the purpose of many terrorists who wish to become "martyrs" for their cause.
During all the decades I sat in prison as an innocent man, I saw societal views gradually change. Not too many years ago, a Democratic candidate could not publicly support same-sex marriage and stand a chance of getting elected in a general election.
Now, a Democratic candidate could not be taken seriously if he or she didn't support same-sex marriage.
Likewise, no serious Democratic candidate should be able to support the death penalty. We have evolved. We have seen the evidence that the death penalty doesn't work and that it kills the innocent.
Given this evidence, it is time that no candidate -- Democrat or Republican -- should be taken seriously if he or she supports capital punishment.
The fact that Clinton continues to hang on to this antiquated relic confuses me. She touts "criminal justice reform" -- and much reform is needed -- but she misses one of the lowest hanging pieces of fruit.
I said last night that I am an "undecided" voter. I hope that Clinton reconsiders her position on capital punishment before I do what I have been waiting my entire life to do: cast my first presidential vote as a free and vindicated man.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/14/1501426/--Satisfied-Town-Hall-Former-Death-Row-Inmate-Questioner-Completely-Disagrees-With-Sec-Clinton
boobooday
(7,869 posts)He makes the case beautifully, and has all the credibility in the world.
He is wise when he could have been bitter.
We owe it to him to reform our criminal justice system, including ending the death penalty.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Her position on the death penalty is one of many horrific positions.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)some of Trump's stupid professments.
And Clinton's reason is just stupid. She fears a terrorist might be sentenced to life in prison rather than death, so she refuses to condemn the death penalty, leaving dozens of times more people to be executed (many innocent) because she can't let go of her instinct for revenge and violence.
FourScore
(9,704 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 15, 2016, 11:53 AM - Edit history (1)
"In the Name of the Father" and the Guildford Four immediately comes to mind.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)Before the movie "The Hurricane" was released, Hillary contacted my good friend Rubin Carter, and arranged a private screening for Bill, Hillary, and Rubin. That meant a lot to me at the time.
I think that her current position on capital punishment is simply a ploy to attract votes. I find it obscene. Rubin and his co-defendant barely escaped the electric chair.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)FourScore
(9,704 posts)I'm going to look for it next time I want to watch a movie.
PWPippin
(213 posts)I'm quite certain I couldn't have been so forgiving.
I agree that Hillary's stance on the death penalty is obscene, as, of course, is the death penalty, itself.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)They need to rule with an iron fist. Don't look to Clinton for other than a show of toughness. Besides as George Bush said when he was governor and relishing denials of clemency, something to the effect, "If they are innocent of this crime, most likely they are guilty of others." The Ruling Class doesn't value justice for the Masses, in fact it's better to keep them scared.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)FourScore
(9,704 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)the death penalty is state sanctioned murder...
I hate liars
(165 posts)My weak paraphrasing of Upton Sinclair's original, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it".
Hillary's support for the private prison industry and the donations to her campaign from that industry are all we need to know about her position on the death penalty.
valerief
(53,235 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Cannot be for I read right on this here site that it was the answer that was going to get her the nomination! You guys had better get with the program.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)They should be given a government pension at the very least.
In addition all three should be given a seat the the prison reform table, where their voices should be heard loud and clear.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)To Having a State Sanctioned Death for a Murder He Did not Commit -- Does Not Bother You?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Some mistakes you can't take back.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)It is so sad that any Democrats support this brutal, backwards practice.
If we still can't get the abolishment of the DP as a plank of our platform - in 20 fucking 16 - then this party really is not for me. It is the party of the status quo, and 'not quite as awful', and that is no longer anywhere near good enough.
nyabingi
(1,145 posts)nyabingi
(1,145 posts)of the debate and it was satisfying personally to see Hillary struggling to formulate an answer - it's hard to veil your cold-heartedness when the moment calls for sympathy and understanding.
It (and Hillary's fawning and completely wrong words about Nancy Reagan) just goes to show that at her core, Hillary is still the Goldwater girl she was in the 60's charading as a liberal ('scuse me, "progressive" . Being in favor of the death penalty is not a position I've known any true progressive to take.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)acceptable that an innocent person ever be executed? And instead of letting her ramble on about the worst of the worst, keep on asking her that question.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)is enough to eliminate the death penalty.
Hillary is wrong on this policy no matter how she tries to polish the answer.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)Because they support her.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...that she only supports the death penalty in terrorism cases.
However, she didn't say, "We should repeal non-terrorist death penalty statutes."
She's using terrorism to justify not trying to make any changes to the death penalty.
ConsiderThis_2016
(274 posts)where was she on Ricky Ray Rector? I think he saved his desert for her & Bill?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricky_Ray_Rector