Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:31 PM Mar 2016

Why it makes sense that Elizabeth Warren has not endorsed anyone

Elizabeth Warren's silence on endorsement makes a lot of sense.

We know she has a preference. We know she voted in the Massachusetts primary, even though we don't know for whom.

Philosophically, it seems she would want Sanders in the race for as long as possible, pushing his issues, which are largely her issues. This is obviously true if she actually prefers that he get the nomination, but is even true if she actually supports Hillary.

IF she actually supports Hillary for president, coming out with that endorsement would not necessarily be in her best interest, because doing so would diminish Bernie's campaign, which as I said, is not ideal for her, as he is pushing her issues... even pushing Hillary on those issues.

IF she actually supports Bernie for president, coming out with that endorsement would likewise not necessarily be in her best interest, because it would diminish her own influence with Hillary, which would especially be a negative if Hillary ends up being the next president.

In the latter case, while she may want to endorse Bernie, it would make sense to wait until such time that it is clear that he has a serious shot at success (so as not to damage her rep with Hillary unnecessarily for what would be a very unlikely outcome), but also possibly still early enough that her endorsement could actually help him win.

After tonight, maybe she will be a lot closer to making an endorsement decision, one way or the other...

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
1. She is sitting on the fence for her own political reasons.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:33 PM
Mar 2016

I like her, dont get me wrong, but if she is the advocate she says she is she is likely a Bernie supporter.

But her political life will be easier if she doesnt jump the gun on that, wont it.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. Sure. It's been obvious as simple everyday politics for quite some time.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:34 PM
Mar 2016

The problem, inasmuch as there is one, is simply that that's not 'leadership'. It's simply doing what's politically expedient, which is one of the things voters are fed up with at the moment. People were wanting more from her than simply acting like any other politician.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. Nah. I am a "people", I really like Warren, and I am not expecting anything from her, concerning
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:43 PM
Mar 2016

endorsements. The whole Congress, IMO, is being "politically expedient". Endorsements don't mean all that much, really.

Thing is, Warren NOT endorsing Hillary is a pretty good stance. If Warren did endorse Hillary, it would make no difference, again IMO, to Bernie's supporters, because an endorsement does not override the very real issue differences.

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
5. I think her endorsement could change things
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:56 AM
Mar 2016

re: "If Warren did endorse Hillary, it would make no difference, again IMO, to Bernie's supporters, because an endorsement does not override the very real issue differences."

I agree it wouldn't make much difference to most Bernie supporters who are likely to vote for him anyway. But it could sway people who are on the fence, or who are considering voting for Bernie only to the extent that they have a sense he could possibly win. A Warren endorsement of Hillary would make her seem even that much more inevitable. (And conversely, if she endorsed Bernie, it would make Hillary seem slightly less inevitable.)

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
6. Picking up from the last sentence in the OP...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 01:37 PM
Mar 2016

...I guess last night didn't change anything. Not enough of a Bernie blowout to convincingly start to rally everyone around Hillary, and obviously not a strong enough showing by Bernie to give him a more persuasive case to make for his own success. So I think it may be time for the EW groundhog to go back into the ground, as we await probably at least 4 more weeks of no endorsement.

brooklynite

(94,602 posts)
7. I'd say Russ Feingold also supports many of Sanders' issues...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 01:47 PM
Mar 2016

...but he's politicall savvy enough to know Sanders is risky as a candidate.

Maybe Warren feels the same way.

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
8. In addition to the Warren considerations...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 03:15 PM
Mar 2016

...he's also running for office himself (and not even as an incumbent), so he has additional concerns of his own. He may not want to not risk offending Hillary supporters OR Bernie supporters, he will need both groups of supporters in November.

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
10. Well, she is making *some* statement by being the only Dem woman in the Senate...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 04:03 PM
Mar 2016

...who has not (yet) endorsed HRC. But ultimately, sure, she will certainly fully support her in the general no matter what.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why it makes sense that E...