2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCan you imagine where Bernie would be if the media had covered him like they have Trump and Clinton?
The whole primary season has been a media block-out for the Sanders campaign. I watch, listened, read. The media bias is so obvious it is pathetic.
I will not give up on Senator Sanders. I can only hope that the media will be more open to all candidates. Not likely but I can hope.
If the coverage had been equal, I believe strongly that the results of yesterdays primaries would have been very different.
riversedge
(70,205 posts)Jesse Lehrich
@JesseLehrich
.@HillaryClinton now up 300+ pledged delegates & 2.5 million+ votes.
#ImWithHer #ShesWithUs
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)back in Vermont playing with his grandkids.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)LeFleur1
(1,197 posts)RKP5637
(67,108 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)Look, Bernie got plenty of coverage, most of it fawning, very little of it critical. It helped to fuel his rise. When people started taking a closer, harder look he looked like a more, shall we say, complicated figure.
He got more debates at his own insistence, lots of town halls, he did pretty well. Clinton just did better.
Somehow Sanders supporters can't seem to accept the fact that actual real live voters looked over Sanders and Clinton and found pretty steadily and pretty wide margins often that they on balance prefer Clinton to Sanders.
Not that Sanders doesn't have his supporters or doesn't have an audience for his brand of politics. But not everybody is as taken with him as either he himself is or his many swooning supporters are.
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)Hillary. The goal should be, bottom line, to make sure of a democratic win in 2016. If not, this country going to descend into hell for the majority of us.
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)which channels they cannot trust and will boycott.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It's how they treat democrats and is how they have for decades. Claiming they treat Clinton with some benefit is garbage.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Bernie was treated like delicate porcelain. Only recently did the media start giving him scrutiny, and boy did we hear the HOWLS of complaints here! (Even "hourly" reports of the total number of "negative" stories published in a 24-hour period.)
He'd have NEVER gotten as far as he did if he hadn't been "ignored" (as you suggest). Face it ... he coasted along for as long as he could.
"Equal" you say? If Bernie's coverage had been "equal" in continuous non-stop negativity as what Hillary had received, he'd have never made it beyond New Hampshire.
Keep in mind that Hillary's current poll numbers AND her current delegate counts AND her current endorsements are ALL INCLUSIVE of the continuous attacks on her!
She's doing find and AHEAD OF THE PACK in spite of the constant attacks and smears and lies and innuendo.
Now, if Bernie can't win a primary with those kinds of odds in his favor, then there's NO WAY he could ever hope to win a national election.
He did good, but not THAT good.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)And thanks for the chuckles...
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)the Hillary hit machine, the DNC, etc, etc, we/Bernie are doing incredible things and we cannot give up.
Yes all the dems have to come together in the end, but, this is a movement like Bernie said, it's not about him.
We have to push twice as hard and I think we will gain the hearts and minds of the people. If we don't, then we will become the idiocracy society. We cannot allow that to happen. If we weren't feeling down, I would be worried.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Bernie's too close to talk about.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)But the corporate press has been all-in for the corporate candidate the whole time...
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)make him a criminal. He has had more coverage than Hillary. Check it out.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)You will note that the giant media corporations are giving money to one of the Democratic candidates.