2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCan the whole "stick a fork in him" thing please just stop?
Last edited Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:30 PM - Edit history (1)
It's petty, it's ugly, and it makes it hard for anything like "unity" to ever be created...assuming your candidate does get nominated.
I'm one of the people who will be spending a lot of time arguing that Bernie supporters should vote HRC in the fall, if she is nominated, and the "stick a fork in him" meme is going to make our jobs very difficult.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)the Clinton campaign's Democratic party reunifying effort. Praise Nancy!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)So nice of Skinner to leave the door open for you!
synergie
(1,901 posts)that vitriol and ugly pettiness that so many of you BSers, including the ones I was responding to have no problem with hypocrisy or actual nastiness.
I think it's cute that your history is actually far worse than mine, but that you think you have some sort high horse to stand on.
Oops, you forgot that your posts were visible to those of us who were alert stalked into silence by the mob, didn't you?
Oh dear.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Especially about the rampant islamophobia on DU.
synergie
(1,901 posts)And about just how much racism, sexism, misogyny and sheer right wing vitriol is applauded and rec'ed by certain folks here, and how they gang up on anyone who dares to disagree and how they protect the vilest of posts from being hidden.
I certainly did learn about where the hate, pettiness and vitriol comes from here. And I see who recs these things, and who cheers it on and who does not.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)NCTraveler
baldguy
treestar
Nitram
Gothmog
MohRokTah
highprincipleswork
bvar22
Dawson Leery
Douglas Carpenter
bravenak
giftedgirl77
Fascinating, Cajunblazer rings the "red Jew" bell, and look who comes to dinner
bravenak
(34,648 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)"Again, I am not writing this to smear Bernie - I believe non of it - I am just pointing out the political sewage which will be directed at Sanders."
So it isn't a neo-nazi smear piece, it's just pointing out the neo-nazi smear and saying it's a reason to jettison Bernie Sanders.
Can't you just feel the love?
Number23
(24,544 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Response to 840high (Reply #49)
Post removed
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)..or images for a political purpose! Please, please don't.
I lived through the assassinations of John Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy.
These murders still hurt. The hurt is as deep as it can go. And millions of people still feel this hurt. We were deprived of all three of our greatest leaders in the space of five years.
But more than this, we now have an opposition candidate, Trump, using violent language and inciting violence. Do NOT contribute to it!
Our candidates are in danger. Supporters are in danger. This kind of language can unhinge unstable people.
Please. PLEASE.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)Yeah, that would work for me.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)The more mud dumped on Bernie and supporters the harder to sing kumbaya in November.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)There will be NO kumbaya moment.
synergie
(1,901 posts)Yes, the blatant lies, misrepresentations and the nastiness exhibited in the GD-P, twitter, FB and other venues online, will make it difficult for you, since we're well aware of where the BS has been coming from and not dumb enough to forget it.
Either you vote Blue or vote Trump, either passively or actively, that's your choice, don't expect reality or the nastiness to be forgotten. The numerous misogynistic tantrums, the lies and the hate is well documented, so don't expect it to be forgotten and don't hold your breath to be courted after all that.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)BS is the Queens specialty. Been that way for decades now. You just don't want to see it. We will NOT come together. The Clinton's are the one's to blame. Cheating is another specialty they have. I will NOT support those that cheated us. You can be suckered but not all of us will be. I just hope an indictment is coming soon. She we can stick a fork in her she's done.
synergie
(1,901 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Nobody is buying it. Your time controlling this board has run it's course.
synergie
(1,901 posts)It's like they don't know that their nastiness has been on public view!
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Months and months of running us off and nasty posts about Hillary and they are the losers.
I am not going to shed any tears over them.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)sitting here in sweats and a t shirt quire comfortable.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)It's just wasted effort. Trying to quash this righteous progressive movement is NEVER going to work.
Faux pas
(14,675 posts)I'd EVER vote for you-know-who.
because thats who will win if we dont vote blue. TRUMP. Hes the big winner and everything you care about goes down the toilet anyway.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Whatever the truth is about the private server, the basis for an "indictment" seems pretty bogus to me. What the discussion is about is the possible misuse of email. It isn't as if HRC ran off to sell the "secrets" to all our enemies.
I agree with Bernie; I'm tired of hearing about all those emails.
Trump, on the other hand, is a real estate developer from Manhattan. If HRC's people can't dig up unprecedented tons of damning info on him they deserve to get dumped.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Real people have real feelings involved here, and no matter which side wins, the winner should be courteous and understanding that the other side are "human" too.
Please knock it off.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)libtodeath
(2,888 posts)spooky3
(34,452 posts)Feelings are raw. No need to make things worse right now.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I can think of a few personalities on this board whose entire career of contributions to the discussion on this site would disappear if we didn't have rofl smileys an' shit.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Plus fracking, Goldman Sachs, corrupt, untrustworthy etc. etc. BS
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)It's not. It's on record.
By the way, you 'forgot' about the silent homophobia, which is another part of why I don't ever want to vote for her.
synergie
(1,901 posts)you speak of , is also not part of reality. And if that's your goal, then you can't vote for BS either, since he put state's rights over LGBT rights and is on record stating that outright.
Not voting Blue in November is a vote for the rather loud homophobia, just sayin'.
Also, note that it's been Hill supporters who have been all about the "vote blue no matter who" segment here, with the BS supporters who have made that statement attacked, abused and mobbed in the nastiest, pettiest, most ugly ways.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Us little gays don't understand what homophobia is, so it's a good thing that you strong heterosexual men and women are there to decide for us.
synergie
(1,901 posts)over the internet, this must be the level of fact based information gathering that leads to such false claims about the record and denial of reality.
That's so cute, how you just demonstrated exactly how much hate and vitriol you use to pretend that your assumptions and your role as victim are justified when facts, reality simply don't support you.
Nope, it's you who doesn't seem to know what homophobia is, or where it's present on the record, even when it's explained to you, making sweeping generalizations about LGBT people and assumptions of ANYONE's sexuality is something that those who are interested in facts and not playing the victim, while slinging the sexual preference based hate don't do.
Or are you just demonstrating what heterophobes and fact-phobes and reality-phobes do when faced with facts and reality that they both hate and are terrified of?
Way to make assumptions, us little folks who like facts, and loathe the lies, really do understand what and where the phobia is and where it's coming from, too bad the sources seem to be blithely unaware of the vitriol and hate they spew.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)I don't care about what other threads you wish to refer to, it does not excuse the vitriol in your post and the petty ugliness embodied in it.
Sorry, but deflect, distract and deny won' t work for you here. You have no leg to stand on. You behaved in just the way you claim other do, you made assumptions on sexual preference based on nothing and attacked. You are not the victim here, you are the attacker.
Must I refer you to your assumptions, your hate and your attacks, or can you scroll up on your own?
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)hate / attacks: you are the one calling me all manner of names. All I did was use sarcasm.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)And if the linkage between Clinton foundation contributions and political favors gets ignored it will be a big surprise.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I started to mention a name, but I don't want to be accused of calling someone out.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)there might be full of themselves aren't they? several virtual ties and several primaries and caucuses with monkey business and somehow she is the air apparent already
synergie
(1,901 posts)(what with data stealing, FEC violations, lying about endorsements, harassing unions etc. etc.) and DEMANDING that the person leading in delegate counts and the popular vote step down so that the choice of temporary party members may be coronated, one group is certainly projecting how full of themselves they are.
And no she's not the HEIR apparent, she's the likely nominee, due to the other guy simply failing to get the votes and the pledged delegates, and who is now planning on interfering with those evil superdelegates, who two days ago were suberting the will of the minority by supporting the will of the majority.
The lack of self awareness is amusing, sad, but amusing.
dchill
(38,489 posts)I think you'd better check yourself. I've been here almost 12 years. A lot of us have, and we have FULLY developed bullshit detectors.
synergie
(1,901 posts)where so many of your friends stated that they were indeed not Democrats and were leaving the party after the primaries. It would be really nice if the BS detectors were functional, but the GD-P, the alert stalking, the jury nonsense, the clear ratfcking, the recs on right wing sources and right wing smears, and the sheer nastiness directed against ANYONE, even fellow BS supporters belies your claims that BS detectors were working.
Check yourself and the threads and the posts, see what was hidden, what was left and calibrate that BS detector, checking yourself is a good thing to do, especially when emotions are running high and reality doesn't match up to what one wishes it were. You actually have to USE those supposedly "fully developed BS detectors" when you ignore them because you like the BS, what use are they?
Kinda like smoke detectors when you enjoy the fire and the siren, not much actual use.
onecaliberal
(32,858 posts)Miss any election. I am one of those people. You might think you know what you're talking about, clearly you don't. The corporate party left me long ago, i will just make it official. My moral code prevents me from remaining.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)many of them actually want you to go away.
Which is kind of obvious given the party realignment under way. It makes sense.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news...
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Many of the establishment Dems would like to see the whole left/progressive side of this party drop off the edge of the earth.
I wish it weren't so.
synergie
(1,901 posts)is not coming from any part of the party or actual progressives.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)That is what happens when you are continuously disenfranchised.
synergie
(1,901 posts)refuse to vote when you don't get your way, or you're convinced that "they're all the same", you're the only one responsible for your disenfranchisement.
The hate that's being roiled up here is not from the progressive side, so much of it is quite literally Right Wing in nature, word and origin.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)We are disenfranchised as if we are not dems, because the only person in the race that is not a sell out is Bernie and he's an Independent.
But Bernie, the Independent is more of an FDR democratic and progressive than Hillary.
And we are continually reminded he's not a DEM...he's a socialist. LIke it's an ugly label. It is not. It's the label this country needs.
Well, I hate to tell you, but the dems in the race are not dems either. They are neocons and bluedogs and they may pretend to have socialist views when it comes to social issues, but when it comes to economic issues, they are true Republican light.
synergie
(1,901 posts)you don't get your way. Bernie has indeed sold out on quite a few issues, and he's pretending to be a Democrat, if he wanted to stay as Independent, he should have run as one, but he sold out for the attention and the money. He admitted as much.
Yeah, such an FDR democrat that he votes against the stuff he put into existence to help trade, like the Ex-Im bank right? Hillary the Democrat is an actual progressive and is in line with progressive and Democrats in 2016, it's why she keeps winning delegates and voters.
He's the one who keeps reminding us that he's a socialist, he just added that Democratic stuff recently because attention and money. This country doesn't agree that we need a socialist, they don't see his plans as actually being feasible and he keeps failing to actually answer questions about how he intends to get things done, you can blame this on supposedly ugly labels he applies to himself, and excusing him when he sells out be it to the NRA, the Gun manufacturers , etc. but the country is rejecting him and his label.
I hate to tell you that there is only one Dem in this race, and she's really Dem, she's not switching labels for attention and money, and just because you've decided to apply false labels such as "neocon" for the sole purpose of trying trying to be ugly, it doesn't make them so.
When it comes to pinning ugly labels on people, it seems that people have a little problem with understanding labels, relying of facts and differentiating between their own rhetoric and propaganda and the truth.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)They claim we don't count. Even though many of us are true blue Dems. Probably most of us.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Are you denying that progressives here have been nasty?
synergie
(1,901 posts)party unity. What realignment? Have you been paying attention to the posts on GDP? All the folks who admitted they only joined the party to vote for BS, and were leaving if they didn't get their way?
Non-Democrats are going back to being Libertarians etc., they have no say about the party. I hate to be the bearer of facts, but there is not much interest in actual unity from the people here who have been making truly nasty comments about bricks and dishing out the ugliness and the pettiness and the abuse. It's why so many were being tombstoned for their Trump advocacy.
The projection is awesome here.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)the realignment started in 1984 and accelerated in 1992
It is fine, this is the nature of US Politics. This is not projection, it is a fact. Once the dust settles, you will see.
By the way, it is called political science. Since you were kind of nasty, I am returning the favor.
Oh and by the way, the GOP is also undergoing massive changes I PREDICTED many of the changes we are undergoing over ten years ago, but here is a useful article..
http://inhomelandsecurity.com/commentary-the-sixth-political-party-realignment-and-the-end-of-the-gop/
Here is another useful article, by the way the FDR realignment gave way to the Johnson coalition, which gave way to the Clinton coalition, which has drifted the party rightward.
http://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/BAIC/Historical-Essays/Keeping-the-Faith/Party-Realignment--New-Deal/
The only thing that both politics and physics abhor is a vacuum though. So if people feel the Dems are abandoning them... (and the GOP is going away, which will pull the party further right), we will see a party emerge. Yes, this one is that serious.
i hope you learn something and chiefly stop psychoanalyzing people online.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)That's what they do.
synergie
(1,901 posts)This board has been filled with ugliness, hate, pettiness and abuse for months now. You want unity? You're going to have to work for it, just like you've been demanding that Hillary supporters do for some time now. Assuming your candidate somehow defies math, reality and common sense, just how do you plan on getting us to forget the sheer slimy nastiness that has been the rage with BS supporters? Remember that little "brick" comment that so many of you so delightedly rec'ed?
He's pretty much done now and come November, those who wish to stop pretending they're liberals are welcome to vote for whomever they choose, from the sheer level of hate and vitriol displayed, demonstrated and encouraged here, they were not voting Blue in any case.
You seem to forget the weeks and months of "memes" and hate that has been present here, including in your own posts. Vote for the qualified candidate, if you cannot do that, it's not our jobs to "convince" you do to the smart thing, that's a choice you will make for yourself, do not expect us to forgive or forget what has been going on here, and what has been said. You want unity, you work for it, just as you demand we do, and you may do so with full knowledge that we're very aware of exactly where the petty, ugly, nastiness has come from and who has been cheering it on.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)We are winning. We are happy. That comes from winning. No we are not going to stop.
You can do what you want. I have spent months on time out vacations reading your nasty posts and now it's time for you to stop.
Bernie cannot win the nomination. It is time to pivot to the general.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)but now we will be extremely happy especially over these next several weeks. That comes from knowing we're on the side of righteousness and that we'll be winning.
No, we are not going to stop. You can do what you want. I have spent months reading yours and many other Hillary supporters' nasty posts and now it's time for Hillary to 'get stuck with the fork'. Yeah, that's some more nasty Hillary supporter sentiment just out today.)
Of course Bernie can win the nomination! We've been canvassing, phonebanking and donating to get to this point. It's almost here. We're going to enjoy it--all the way to the convention.
Go Bernie!
*imitation is the sincerest form of throwing it back at you.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)They love violence and violent imagery. I can't blame them for that. You should see my movie playlist. But, I rarely speak like that to or with other people anymore. I am old and calming down. I don't know about Hill supporters though, they don't seem to be doing the calming down thing.
Logical
(22,457 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)ebayfool
(3,411 posts)I swear it's like somebody opened the doors and boom! Bile everywhere!
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)It's a very low bar.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)I doubt they would be any nicer than Hillary supporters.
But still all the ugliness should stop.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)just how do you plan on getting us to forget the sheer slimy nastiness that has been the rage with BS supporters?
I never saw that thread, and yes that is disgusting. I've called out lots of nasty behavior from the Bernie group. I don't often see anyone from the Hillary group doing the same.
Yes, there has been sheer nastiness from teh Hillary group, from day one of Bernie running.
But for some reason, some of you think it's only coming from one side.
I just don't get it. You don't even see what is coming from your side.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)to my shock mind you, that I was truly born in fly over country, and was not born in Mexico, or was a Jew, or was a self identified latina. You think I will forget, or chiefly forgive those folks? Oh and I do have a list of them. Oh and those were HRC supporters
Best part is, I am not a BS supporter. I frankly don't give two shits who the Democrats nominate, but I worry about November. If I have to explain why... well suffice it to say... if my worst fears are realized...
John Poet
(2,510 posts)as well as a lying candidate. They seem to like the lies.
Probably comes from trying to find too much "common ground" with Republicans.
UMTerp01
(1,048 posts)While Hillary Clinton supporters have taken the brunt of a lot of negative Hillary Clinton threads, its so unnecessary to be petty right now. Sanders has made her a better candidate and there's no denying that.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Deserves our vote in Nov? This is different this time. I don't like that they cheat, so I can't support them for cheating us. Supporting her if she is the nominee is saying we forgive her and her "husband" for cheating us out. I will not be part of that. They blew it.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)I've seen some nasty graphics on the other side too but you know what? That doesn't make it okay unless you are in the third grade.
Truth is, I question the legitimacy of the most tacky offenders on both sides. Seems like it would be considered a "noble quest" of little cheetos-fueled sub-terrainian trolls who tuck themselves in beneath Confederate flag bedspreads in the basement of their momma's slightly-neglected suburban home.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)I've been Bernie from day 1, but you have to expect this when you lose.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Maybe not this time.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)Fuck everybody on my ignore list.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)I tried and was met with insults, the kind of insults that have been the very basis of the arguments against all of us who dare to believe we have a right to vote as we see fit, just as they expressed about great swaths of the Democratic electorate. Unfortunately, far too many have little regard for the rights of anyone who disagrees with them and are all too certain they are the only people fit to make political decisions. They have the audacity to claim democracy is dead because THEY didn't get their pick for the nominee, as though their rights trump the majority's, as though democracy is defined by rule by a small minority of voters over the rest. Perhaps if they hadn't spent the last several months insulting everyone who dared to ask questions about their candidate or express any dissent, they might have had more success. But ultimately displaying an entirely unjustified sense of superiority proved to be more important than any issue or goal, even Bernie's political success.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)You won, so you get to twist the knife. But let's be honest about what you really expressed.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)let that represent Hillary's supporters
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:53 AM - Edit history (1)
And I do not mean of ignored
Since there was a jury. Simply put I learned my lesson. Ignore is abused. So I simply have a list of folks I have little to none interaction. It keeps those who otherwise bully in check
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)"It's petty, it's ugly, and it makes it hard for anything like "unity" to ever be created...assuming your candidate does get nominated."
You should have thought about that before you started posting this primary season.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)makes it difficult for you to talk to die hard "we still have a chance, despite the math" Bernie supporters.
But are you talking the math to the die hard "we still have a chance, despite the math" Bernie supporters.
The "stick a fork in him" posts are in response to the Hail Mary crew.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Glass houses and such.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And some of us alerted on those.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)So since we seem to just be talking about what supporters have said, I'll mention those are the ones I could think of just off the top of my head.
Which is exactly why these new pleas for civility are so utterly laughable.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)The selective outrage is staggering.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Never.
And realistically, he is done, so "stick a fork in him" is an appropriate analogy. It's just reality. His supporters choose to take it personally.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)I mean, the alternative is likely Donald Trump.
But Bernie doesn't get the support that those of us who love him think he deserves. You cannot argue reasonably that his campaign has been treated fairly by either the DNC or the MSM.
Hillary is seen by many outside observers to be a terrible candidate to run against Trump, and that seems patently clear to me also, although not apparently to the average Democratic voter.
Then there is the great distaste that supporters of each side have for each other, the difficulty in mending fences, the difficulty in enlisting supporters from the losing side to not only vote for the other candidate but to volunteer, donate, etc. - all the things that make for a successful campaign.
Really curious how we are going to run a successful Democratic campaign.
Should have started with a more robust debate schedule and a welcoming inclusion of all candidates. Now, presuming Hillary continues to score majority victories, really should include not just lip service to the Progressive fervor that Bernie has brought to the campaign for Democrats and Independents alike, but a full-scale and authentic adoption of Progressive policies moving forward. Frankly, that is the only way that I see Hillary (if it is in fact going to be Hillary) to move forward and win.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)and telling lies are a HUGE turnoff.....but IMO it is in their nature and why they follow someone who is most like themselves, they can not help it.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511163234#post2
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511048408
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511018138#post10
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=599241
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=599241
(Just a small sample)
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)As usual.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)After all the alert stalking?
After the months of nastiness and personal attacks from the Sanders side?:
Are you fucking kidding me????
I'm spiking this fucking football and wallowing in the gloating pride of my candidate's win.