Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 11:16 PM Mar 2016

New Name Surfaces in Clinton's Emails


New Name Surfaces In Clinton's Email Scandal

Steve Morgan ,

A new name has surfaced in connection to Hillary Clinton’s private email server – Ronald S. Posner, Chairman and CEO at eChinaCash.

Michael Scheidell was previously Founder at SECNAP from December 2001 to August 2012. The SECNAP CloudJacket security device was purchased and installed by Hillary Clinton’s technology consultants in late 2013 — coincidentally right after Scheidell left the company he started up and ran for eleven years.

snip

“Ron brings a wealth of knowledge about information technology and a record of helping companies reach their full potential,” stated Nappe in the press release on Posner. “His leadership, experience and contacts will be a great asset to the company.”

Did Posner ask Norton for an introduction to Clinton? Did Clinton know that Posner was on the board at SECNAP – and CEO at eChinaCash – when she did business with them? What role, if any, did Posner have in connection with Clinton’s private email server? Did Posner provide anyone in China with access to SECNAP’s technology – which could have led to the cyber attacks on Clinton’s server? Did Posner or anyone else in China have access to some or all of Hillary Clinton’s emails?


http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevemorgan/2016/03/05/new-name-surfaces-in-clintons-email-scandal/#2d8cec841116
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
2. email clinton cash Benghazi yada yada yada
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 11:18 PM
Mar 2016

Yawn

Give it up it isn't helping Bernie.


Maybe it helps someone else?

On edit: Transcripts!

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
5. Hillary supporters are completely immune to issues
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 11:50 PM
Mar 2016

However, the rest of the country is not. Most just don't like her to begin with, so they'll be a lot more likely to consider and believe what is said about her. Trump or any republican will have so much materiel against her. In a sick and twisted way, I'm looking forward to the sheer volume of whining when the GE gets underway and these things are talked about.

Jarqui

(10,128 posts)
3. This did come up in a blog last October or before
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 11:33 PM
Mar 2016
http://www.csoonline.com/article/2991947/cyber-attacks-espionage/hillary-rodham-clinton-virus.html

I'd read about it some time ago but do not remember it being the above link.

I suppose the authorities cannot leave any stone unturned but this struck me as a bit of guilt by association. I couldn't get too worked up over it because there is no real evidence of a wrongful act.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
7. I still say she set up the private server to facillitate a system to sell influence
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:02 AM
Mar 2016

All those emails that were exchanged between her and corporate execs to offer US contracts that coincided with donations made to the Clinton Foundation arent an accident in timing.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
9. interesting
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:03 AM
Mar 2016

and I need to go back and look at that bit about the Saudis giving money to the Foundation and then getting arms.

mooseprime

(474 posts)
10. i think it was >10 middle eastern countries
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:13 AM
Mar 2016

although the saudis did get more than anyone in arms sales, almost 30B. There was a quid pro quo with a whole bunch of them, an 1:1 correlation between Foundation donations and the otherwise prohibited sale being greenlighted by the SoS's office. but as we know, Clinton's record shows no influence on her behavior towards policies involving donors. Wheeeee!

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
11. Keep posting.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:15 AM
Mar 2016

Too many Democrats are yet unaware of the likely corruption of the Foundation and SoS office.

mooseprime

(474 posts)
12. ah, here we are
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:26 AM
Mar 2016
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/05/hillary-clinton-foundation-state-arms-deals

scroll down to the bottom to see the list of countries, their donations to the Foundation, and the subsequent % increase in the approved arms sales.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
8. from the article
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 12:02 AM
Mar 2016

Did Posner ask Norton for an introduction to Clinton? Did Clinton know that Posner was on the board at SECNAP – and CEO at eChinaCash – when she did business with them? What role, if any, did Posner have in connection with Clinton’s private email server? Did Posner provide anyone in China with access to SECNAP’s technology – which could have led to the cyber attacks on Clinton’s server? Did Posner or anyone else in China have access to some or all of Hillary Clinton’s emails?

There is no evidence of wrongdoing by Posner. But the FBI and DOJ should leave no stone unturned – and have a talk with him.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»New Name Surfaces in Clin...