2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNew Name Surfaces in Clinton's Emails
New Name Surfaces In Clinton's Email Scandal
Steve Morgan ,
A new name has surfaced in connection to Hillary Clintons private email server Ronald S. Posner, Chairman and CEO at eChinaCash.
Michael Scheidell was previously Founder at SECNAP from December 2001 to August 2012. The SECNAP CloudJacket security device was purchased and installed by Hillary Clintons technology consultants in late 2013 coincidentally right after Scheidell left the company he started up and ran for eleven years.
snip
Ron brings a wealth of knowledge about information technology and a record of helping companies reach their full potential, stated Nappe in the press release on Posner. His leadership, experience and contacts will be a great asset to the company.
Did Posner ask Norton for an introduction to Clinton? Did Clinton know that Posner was on the board at SECNAP and CEO at eChinaCash when she did business with them? What role, if any, did Posner have in connection with Clintons private email server? Did Posner provide anyone in China with access to SECNAPs technology which could have led to the cyber attacks on Clintons server? Did Posner or anyone else in China have access to some or all of Hillary Clintons emails?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevemorgan/2016/03/05/new-name-surfaces-in-clintons-email-scandal/#2d8cec841116
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Yawn
Give it up it isn't helping Bernie.
Maybe it helps someone else?
On edit: Transcripts!
840high
(17,196 posts)nominee. Why don't u want to know about your candidate?
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)However, the rest of the country is not. Most just don't like her to begin with, so they'll be a lot more likely to consider and believe what is said about her. Trump or any republican will have so much materiel against her. In a sick and twisted way, I'm looking forward to the sheer volume of whining when the GE gets underway and these things are talked about.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Jarqui
(10,128 posts)I'd read about it some time ago but do not remember it being the above link.
I suppose the authorities cannot leave any stone unturned but this struck me as a bit of guilt by association. I couldn't get too worked up over it because there is no real evidence of a wrongful act.
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)DJ13
(23,671 posts)All those emails that were exchanged between her and corporate execs to offer US contracts that coincided with donations made to the Clinton Foundation arent an accident in timing.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)and I need to go back and look at that bit about the Saudis giving money to the Foundation and then getting arms.
mooseprime
(474 posts)although the saudis did get more than anyone in arms sales, almost 30B. There was a quid pro quo with a whole bunch of them, an 1:1 correlation between Foundation donations and the otherwise prohibited sale being greenlighted by the SoS's office. but as we know, Clinton's record shows no influence on her behavior towards policies involving donors. Wheeeee!
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Too many Democrats are yet unaware of the likely corruption of the Foundation and SoS office.
mooseprime
(474 posts)scroll down to the bottom to see the list of countries, their donations to the Foundation, and the subsequent % increase in the approved arms sales.
revbones
(3,660 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)Did Posner ask Norton for an introduction to Clinton? Did Clinton know that Posner was on the board at SECNAP and CEO at eChinaCash when she did business with them? What role, if any, did Posner have in connection with Clintons private email server? Did Posner provide anyone in China with access to SECNAPs technology which could have led to the cyber attacks on Clintons server? Did Posner or anyone else in China have access to some or all of Hillary Clintons emails?
There is no evidence of wrongdoing by Posner. But the FBI and DOJ should leave no stone unturned and have a talk with him.