2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders on Maddow's show last night said he could win NY; new poll has him trailing by 48pt
Eric Boehlert @EricBoehlert 2h2 hours agoSanders went on Maddow's show last night and said he could win NY; new poll has him trailing by 48 pts there; http://www.theecps.com/
In the Democratic primary, Clinton is ahead of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders by 48 points, taking 71% of the vote to Sanderss 23%. The former Secretary of State holds a massive advantage in key demographic groups, including men (66% to 29%), women (73% to 20%), African Americans (72% to 22%) and Hispanics (85% to 8%). Younger voters, ages 18-34, favor Sanders, but by a slimmer margin (53% to 40%) than in many primary states. Among all other age groups, Clinton dominates, leading by 45 points (ages 35-54), 50 points (ages 55-74), and 67 points (ages 75+).
Clinton and Sanders have similar favorability numbers with likely Democratic primary voters. Her favorable/unfavorable ratio is 82%/15% (+67); his is 63%/26% (+37). However Clinton garners far more loyalty: 85% of those who view her favorably plan to vote for her in the primary, while only 31% who have a favorable view of Sanders intend to vote for him.
ECPS @EmersonPolling
#NewYork poll: Clinton leads Sanders w/ both African American (72% to 22%) and Hispanic voters (85% to 8%).
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)bigtree
(85,995 posts)...is more realization of escalating uphill climb for Sanders; no only in the states which are battlegrounds for his campaign which Clinton is still actively competing in for more delegates, but also in the increasing margins he'll need in later contests due to big Hillary margins in states like NY, NJ...
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Hillary was a Senator there. She voted for the Iraq resolution in the wake of 9-11. Ted Cruz has a chance to win New York if Bernie does.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)As Senator, Hillary not only voted for the resolution but also went to the White House to secure 9-11 disaster relief funding. Some posters on this forum tried to frame that as a buying her vote which I think was very unfair. Either way, the people of New York has a visceral attachment to Hillary that I don't believe Sanders can overcome.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)You say plenty. What?
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Bush, Cheney and Rice were going around the country in the months following 9-11 talking of Iraq in terms of "mushroom clouds". Hillary voted on that resolution the way New Yorkers wanted her to vote. She also secured disaster relief funding.
Therefore, for the people of New York, her vote had everything to do with 9-11 in a visceral sense. To your point, yes, Bush lied about his intention to leverage the a use of force to get Saddam to accept full U.N. inspections. We now know the Bush Administration had already made their final decision. And, yes, they distorted the intelligence as justification. But, VISCERALLY, Hillary voted as the her constituents wanted her to vote.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)New Yorkers wanted her to.
Response to bigtree (Original post)
kennetha This message was self-deleted by its author.
calguy
(5,306 posts)After all, he's a politician and he HAS to portray an upbeat view of his future prospects. But he's also a very smart man and he knows he has very little chance to overtake HRC at this point.
He owes it to his supporters to fight on to the convention and he won't disappoint.
In the end he will support HRC and become a very valuable asset to the cause.
He's run one hell of a campaign and deserves much credit for his efforts.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)The quick intense bursts of highly effective ads and the transition from name-ID (which favors the Clintons) to the get-serious period won Michigan and nearly won MA.
Clinton is underwater in NY
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/09/21/hillary-clinton-is-now-viewed-unfavorably-in-new-york/
bigtree
(85,995 posts)...she's come a long way.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)bigtree
(85,995 posts)In New York, Sanders' is 54-35. Trump's 56-38. Clinton's is 67-30, in new Emerson Poll.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)He's not going to win NY. Neither is he going to win NJ and PA. I live by Manhattan on the Jersey side of the Hudson river. This is my campaign area, I know the three states well. Hillary will win the three of them. I think that she'll probably win MD too.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)he can not make it up.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I think he really believes the things he says. Which tells me he has a problem with reality.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts).. before that Obama left behind his movement even though there were numerous communications from OFA, Cornell West somehow isn't a blatant insult to Obama and now this?!
Like reality isn't ... reality?!
am I close?
Beacool
(30,247 posts)The Clintons have lived in the state since they left the WH. Hillary was their senator for 8 years. I don't think that she'll win by the margin on this poll, but she'll win handily.