2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumChelsea says Mom will fix Obamacares high deductibles with tax credits.
These ridiculous deductibles are a huge problem but paying it upfront and waiting for tax time for reimbursement won't solve it. My healthcare clients say people are foregoing care specifically because of the high cash upfront costs.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3508580/Chelsea-Clinton-s-shock-attack-Obamacare-s-crushing-costs-hints-mother-change-Democrats-key-policy.html
Trajan
(19,089 posts)A woman of the people (on Wall Street) ...
Baobab
(4,667 posts)though.
Subsidies of all kinds are trade distorting.
Foreign health insurers and healthcare providers are a crucial part of this plan and under the Clinton plan they need to be encouraged to come in, making single payer forever impossible to return to. (Because the new right to forever sell cheap services here will become a property right enjoyed by foreign corporations)
Gotta have a CPA to get through all the paperwork to get what should be a basic human right.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)on tax credits.
And tax credits can be set up so they're deducted from payments -- they wouldn't HAVE to wait till April.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)lead the shit out of us.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts)Tax credits are a right wing solution to benefit the wealthy while seeming to address the problems of the non-wealthy.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)The article is largely quotes and video. Where's the spin? Where's the "Conspiracy!", Dan?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)But go ahead, defend the right-wing media. It's fascinating that Bernie fans have such trust and even admiration for right-wing rags! Who'da thunk!
Wilms
(26,795 posts)She said Sanders wants to "dismantle" Obamacare. Are you OK with that?? Even the MSM cringed. You, Dan??
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)So just to be clear, you're OK with Chelsea lying about Sanders' intentions? And you think quoting her puts me in line with "the right-wing press"? Is that right, Dan??
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)...just like her Mom and Dad. And there's a ton of evidence...their own words...to support my assertion.
Got it, Dan? I AM calling the three of them liars. And it's a matter of public record.
Now, run along and play.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)I get that you hate the Clintons, but you should find a way to hate them without justifying the spreading of right-wing media on a Democratic Forum.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)There is no justifying the right wing. The ONLY thing I see being justified is you justifying lying.
That's a shame, Dan. You, the Clintons, and the right wing seem to have a lot in common.
Have you always justified liars, Dan? Or only certain ones?
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Oh, and of course I don't justify lying. I just don't buy into right-wing smears like you do.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Lying away, just like Mom and Dad, Dan.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)PS: the fact that you disagree with something doesn't make it a "lie."
Wilms
(26,795 posts)I knew you would, Dan.
Don't teach logic. Maybe intern for Brock. But do not teach logic.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Believe me, I get that you're not interested in learning logic.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Clearly, Chelsea is lying. But you don't care about that. You'd rather hurl insults at me for pointing the material out.
Gee, Dan. I don't know about that.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Oh, and LOL about the "hurl insults" quip.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511572648#post66
Wilms
(26,795 posts)I realize you are just mis-speaking, but be careful. I would not want someone to think you are a liar like the Clintons.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)They act as facilitators of an upward shift of capital to those who will use it more efficiently without any bloodshed.
That was sarcasm, right?
After WWII we had a golden opportunity to make hanges that gave people rights to life and to basic human rights that we never took. Instead peoples rights come out of their country of citizenship and who their parents are and their marital status and a bunch of similar things that together dont add up to anything close to what they should be.
Meanwhile, exponentially improving automation is taking away what TPTB see as people's main benefit, their status as the cheapest supercomputer out there, as more and more jobs that previouslly could only be done by people become doable by computer..
So, in the final analysis either they - either we all are scientists and money makes less importance - is deemphasized by making the esentials top quality and free (already prohibited by FTAs) or they are just consumers. And people without money are seen as a negative to them.
People with low or increasingly no incomes will become worse than irrelevant politically because they wont live anywher and wont be able to vote, or if they have managed to hold on to a place to live they may be seen as a "dead weight" by increasingly bought and sold lawmakers. That's how the advertising industry has seen older people all along. According to "ad men" Ive known.
Trade deals basically take all the good things government could do off the table and replace them with explicit declarations that they cannot do those things.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)She said she would do what she could through Executive Action, OR work with Congress on tax credits.
And, FYI, tax credits can be set up so they're directly deducted from monthly payments. Just because they're tax credits doesn't mean they'd have to wait till April.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)than deflect and muddy the waters????
DanTex
(20,709 posts)purpose of smearing the presumptive Democratic nominee.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)are not just limited to RW links...........but of course you knew that already
DanTex
(20,709 posts)me for pointing it out.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)on your replies, I have noticed a pattern............
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts)They always seem to work out a way to screw the "little people."
Tax credits are one of those Republican scams that end up benefitting the wealthy.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)Third Way is a bridge between all that.
For example, earning capacity in the future globalized service economy will be determined by objective and verifiable criteria.
i.e. education.
Firms are expected to locate wherever regulatory conditions are most favorable to them.
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)Nothing more than that.
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)Csainvestor
(388 posts)The government already pays the insurance companies with ACA subsidies. This will transfer even more tax payer dollars to the for profit insurance companies.
This will not decrease costs, and even worse, it means tax payers will subsidize corporate profits.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)in 1998, (Understanding on Commitments in Financial Service)
and health insurance is explicitly listed in the US's Schedule of Commitments as an included financial service, so there is no ambiguity, it definitely applies.
This was done to facilitate foreign investment (FDI) in our health insurance market.
They are what are called non-tariff barriers (NTBs) to trade.
Since they stand in the way of FDI they will be found to violate the standstill, and so "rollback" will kick in and roll them back to their state at the Understanding's signing in 1998.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)By covering their employees.
The premium costs for the City I retired from were about 1,800 dollars per month, per employee.
Tax dollars pay this corporate welfare (extortion).
Autumn
(45,071 posts)I would much rather those subsidies we are paying for the ACA go into an existing government program like medicare. Medicare for all.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)I doubt she has that consideration. Bit of a disconnect there.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)A "tax credit" still requires you to fork over the cash from your own coffers before qualifying for the tax credit the following year.
Clearly just a vacuous position. Bernie has the only plan that will actually HELP people.
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)This guy tho...
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)And that is definitely something.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)For poor people whose jobs don't offer health insurance, taking a chunk out of their monthly income is more of a fiancial strain than paying the penalty. A tax refund a few months down the lines means nothing to a person having trouble paying their rent in November.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)We shelled out $3k, not including premiums, from 1/1-2/4, mostly for Pharma. Plus an extra $850 oop rework on a root canal. Tax credit wouldn't save me from the pharma vultures, or helped with the dental that exceeded my plan. Medicare for all and sanely negotiated med & pharma rates like all of the 30+ counties that rank ahead of the US, might have helped us though.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)I pay $400 a month from $1,000 a month Social Security
For Medicare, Medigap, and a Drug Plan. Still does not cover Vision, Hearing or Dental.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)The first public statement she made about healthcare was to lie about Bernie's healthcare plan and smear him.
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
onecaliberal
(32,854 posts)Out of touch! As we are all aware
Baobab
(4,667 posts)The Constitution is clear that persons cannot be asked to quarter troops in their houses (which is interpreted as corporations or any business must be paid what they ask for things. All price controls in the US are legally challengeable and on shaky legal grounds in this country.
The only way Hillary could reduce costs apart from globalizing the provision of services (after all, its an emergency, isnt it?) were prevented in perpetuity by Bill's trade deal.
So kiss those high wage services jobs goodbye. We need to respond to these crises, dammit.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Besides, Hillary's "fix" wouldn't fix anything.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)If a person can't put forward the upfront cash...then how does waiting for tax time help.
longship
(40,416 posts)In other words, people too poor to pay taxes.
Healthcare for everybody, like every other modern country, is the only solution. A solution that Hillary Clinton will not support. She wants tax credits to buy health insurance from private companies instead of providing healthcare to everybody, tax credits which do nothing for those who still cannot afford insurance.
And Chelsea Clinton is as much a part of the problem as her mother and father. Entitled, wealthy, blind to anybody who isn't.
Screw them all.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Many people pay for insurance just in case. That doesn't mean they can afford to use it.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)The people who can't afford high deductibles and out of pocket expenses aren't paying enough in taxes for tax credits.
Talk about tone-deaf.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)She doesn't care about paying bills. They seem to just pay themselves, including her $50,000 a month mortgage.
andym
(5,443 posts)and then the government will pay you, raising income.
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/css/resource/income-tax-credit-for-low-income-working-individuals
MoonchildCA
(1,301 posts)But, you can receive a tax credit whether you paid taxes or not. It's a tax deduction that doesn't benefit. I know because back when I was a single working mom, I received an earned income credit of over $2000, when I owed virtually nothing in federal income taxes.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)We ourselves have gone from the gold plan the first year, to the silver plan the following year, and now we have the bronze plan all due to rising premium payments every year. Next year we will probably be relegated to the Lead plan due to further premium increases.
I know Hillary supporters are wholly against a True Government healthcare plan like the one proposed by Senator Sanders because they are fervently against having the Government come between you and your doctor, but are they able to explain the true benefit of having a For-Profit Middleman between you and your doctor instead? How is that superior to a Government run system? If they can, I haven't seen it. If their criticism of Bernies plan is based on "access", well we already know that is a load of bunk. So what is it really? Why the need for a for-profit middleman in US healthcare?
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)I am also in North Carolina and went from a gold plan to a silver plan when the premiums for the gold plan jumped 60-70%. My deductible went up from something like $1500 to $6000 last year. And I hit the jackpot, had my first flare up from Crohn's disease in 5-6 years and spent the full $6000 plus monthly health premiums last year.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)are not in as good a position as States that have embraced the ACA, but the fact that states can even opt out if they choose is a huge shortcoming. Medicare for all single payer is what truly makes sense, and is unarguably the most moral position to take.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)I was talking with a pregnant waitress at a local restaurant, probably in her early to mid 30's, late last year. I told her I had just gotten a flu shot and she was wondering if a pregnant woman should get one and what it cost. I told her that her health insurance policy would probably pay for it and she said she didn't have one, that it was cheaper to pay the fine. For somebody with little money, having an insurance policy with a $5000 annual deductible is like not having insurance, so why pay monthly premiums if the fine is cheaper? They just gamble that they won't get sick. If they get unlucky, a big medical bill will drive them into bankruptcy.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)If you're grossing maybe $20K and have a high deductible that you can't afford to use, just what exactly will a tax credit do for you?
onecaliberal
(32,854 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)dumb as shit solutions.
Got love the Clinton's rich man's solution for tax cuts and right offs for corporate poor people..
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)2 1/2 & 3 1/2 years to go. Fingers crossed.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Chelsea has tried but can't bring herself to care about money. Of course, money seems to fall in her lap. $50,000 a month from NBC to do almost nothing, $300,000 plus stock options to attend a few board meetings a year at IAC, etc. And her hedge fund husband has a ready made clientele with investors like Lloyd Blankfein and other Goldman Sachs executives putting millions into his fund; and he only has to pay a 15% tax rate on his "carried interest" that is called ordinary income in any other industry and taxed at a much higher rate.
Doesn't everybody have a $52,000 per month mortgage?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/10902554/Chelsea-Clinton-interview-I-will-always-work-harder-than-anyone.html
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Insurance agencies are pushing hard to move everyone to high-deductible plan. That puts the load of paying for coverage on the taxpayer. Insurance is basically doing nothing and we may as well move to single payer.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Chelsea seems to think Republicans will pass a bill to strengthen the ACA. After voting more than 60 times to repeal it.
Who's the "realistic" candidate again?
Prism
(5,815 posts)Have the Clintons ever met a poor person? Hell, I'd settle for working or middle class at this point.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)Unfortunately it doesn't get at the actual root cause of the high deductibles, which is driven by corporate greed. This is why we should eschew Obamacare, which is basically a 1990s Heritage Foundation corporate welfare program for the insurance industry, and merely expand the Medicare system to provide care for all Americans instead of just those over 65. The structure is already there.
And for those who will read this and sputter something about 'unicorns,' I'll point out that between my employer and I, we pay 18.8% of my gross pay for shitty, rationed healthcare with growing copays, and huge deductibles in case I have to have surgery.
IF OBAMACARE IS SO WORTH SAVING, THEN WHY ARE WE STILL PAYING A GREATER PERCENT OF OUR GDP THAN ANYONE ELSE, AND NOT GETTING AS MUCH FOR IT???
Just asking...
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I posted a thread about it very early this morning http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1571795 and got hammered by Hillary supporters who would rather attack the source despite Chelsea saying what she does on video. I always find that both amazing and hilarious. Some don't ever want to see the truth, ever.
Vinca
(50,269 posts)A tax credit in April won't keep your credit from going down the tubes if you break your leg in July of the previous year and can't pay the deductible. Chelsea can explain this with a straight face because, as she's previously said, she's tried to care about money, but just can't.
Autumn
(45,071 posts)These pampered people have no fucking clue what life is like.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)this simple truth does she fail to comprehend: if people do not have the money to pay for the deductible, a tax credit means ZIP.
Insurance is not healthcare , and if people are struggling for basics like food and shelter, insurance may be too high even with the so-called ACA. Then, if one can squeeze in the cost of insurance, the deductibles make using the insurance for actual care WORTHLESS.
Chelsea is just as tone deaf as Momma $Hillary. She needs to STFU and go back to decorating her 6.5 bathrooms!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It's a lie she tells every day.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Typical shill.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)They are, of course, very helpful for people who can afford to earn them and use them.
The term "Limousine Liberal" comes to mind.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)I'm sure she'll be running some day too.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)mail. How you going to help her Hillary? My guess is you won't.