Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy Clinton Supporters Need to Speak up More on Social Media
I realize Facebook is not a scientifically controlled microcosm of the real world. Unlike the real world, which is made up of diverse, often oppositional elements mixed in with all our familial/friend solidarities, the Facebook world is typically less eclectic. We tend to build our circles with people who think similarly, share similar tastes, follow similar threads, with, perhaps, a smattering of contrariness here and there. Even I, who has a public page, find the bulk of my Facebook circle to be largely of like-mind. (Though I certainly get my share of random haters!)
Then Election 2016 happened and I discovered that not only does my circle include a few libertarians, Tea Partiers and right-wingers, but theres a solid contingent of hard-lefties, uber progressives and extremist liberals. And I am none of those, on either end of the spectrum. Im a registered Democrat who falls ever-so-slightly left of center and who believes being a centrist, a moderate, is a good thing. That assessment is based on years (Im moderately old) of being around extremists from both sides of the aisle and finding extremism to be, well, extreme; often close-minded, tunnel-visioned, self-focused and largely uncompromising. And while being uncompromising is good when it comes to morality, integrity, and honor, it is less so when working amongst people with diverse interests, learning to collaborate, listen, and consider the needs and realities of many different views. Which is certainly the assignment of any politician, particularly the president of the United States.
So given my stated political status, as well as the aforementioned stew that is my Facebook circle, you would not be surprised to learn that I hear a lot of chatter, view a lot of posts and witness a lot of political haranguing that is not of my ilk, not my perspective, not my think. I dont mind I think its important we stay aware of whats going on in other corners of the world/country; equally important that we dont spend all our time preaching to the choir. But while I find political solidarity with most/all memes, jokes, concerns, expressions of horror related to the Republican ticket, I am less in-line with what I see most in my newsfeed on the Dem side: the #FeeltheBern-ers. Ive gotten so I cringe when I see that hashtag. Which got me to wondering why.
As Ive always maintained, I like Bernie. I think hes a passionate, well-meaning guy whos been deeply involved in issues that resonate with a lot of people. They resonate with me. But theyre not all that resonates with me. Theres much that he pays little attention to, or has a different opinion about, that is also important to me. So hes not my guy for president. Because I believe being the president of this country, particularly at this time in our history, requires talents, skills, experiences, nuances, personality traits and worldviews that are not necessarily in his wheelhouse. They are in the wheelhouse of Hillary Clinton. Which is why shes my guy.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lorraine-devon-wilke/why-clinton-supporters-ne_b_9554372.html
Then Election 2016 happened and I discovered that not only does my circle include a few libertarians, Tea Partiers and right-wingers, but theres a solid contingent of hard-lefties, uber progressives and extremist liberals. And I am none of those, on either end of the spectrum. Im a registered Democrat who falls ever-so-slightly left of center and who believes being a centrist, a moderate, is a good thing. That assessment is based on years (Im moderately old) of being around extremists from both sides of the aisle and finding extremism to be, well, extreme; often close-minded, tunnel-visioned, self-focused and largely uncompromising. And while being uncompromising is good when it comes to morality, integrity, and honor, it is less so when working amongst people with diverse interests, learning to collaborate, listen, and consider the needs and realities of many different views. Which is certainly the assignment of any politician, particularly the president of the United States.
So given my stated political status, as well as the aforementioned stew that is my Facebook circle, you would not be surprised to learn that I hear a lot of chatter, view a lot of posts and witness a lot of political haranguing that is not of my ilk, not my perspective, not my think. I dont mind I think its important we stay aware of whats going on in other corners of the world/country; equally important that we dont spend all our time preaching to the choir. But while I find political solidarity with most/all memes, jokes, concerns, expressions of horror related to the Republican ticket, I am less in-line with what I see most in my newsfeed on the Dem side: the #FeeltheBern-ers. Ive gotten so I cringe when I see that hashtag. Which got me to wondering why.
As Ive always maintained, I like Bernie. I think hes a passionate, well-meaning guy whos been deeply involved in issues that resonate with a lot of people. They resonate with me. But theyre not all that resonates with me. Theres much that he pays little attention to, or has a different opinion about, that is also important to me. So hes not my guy for president. Because I believe being the president of this country, particularly at this time in our history, requires talents, skills, experiences, nuances, personality traits and worldviews that are not necessarily in his wheelhouse. They are in the wheelhouse of Hillary Clinton. Which is why shes my guy.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lorraine-devon-wilke/why-clinton-supporters-ne_b_9554372.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 881 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Clinton Supporters Need to Speak up More on Social Media (Original Post)
SecularMotion
Mar 2016
OP
Hillary is so divisive, it isn't even funny. And I mean even in the Democratic Party.
highprincipleswork
Mar 2016
#1
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)1. Hillary is so divisive, it isn't even funny. And I mean even in the Democratic Party.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)2. It's not that they don't try, among those that use the internet.
Many do not have knowledge of social media. Others do not have access.
I bet after the primary, studies will show that the number one predictor of Sanders v Clinton support was internet use, not race, gender or even age.
http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/
Vote2016
(1,198 posts)3. we need more "goshdarnit, it's her TURN" posts? she's our Romney, don't expect enthusiasm
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)4. too late
All your internets belong to us!
Red Oak
(697 posts)5. There aren't that many 1% on Facebook
I guess they could always hire out for some comments.