2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVoting for Bernie Sanders is a Win-Win for Democrats
(snip)
Bernie Sanders stances on nearly every major issue are enormously popular among Americans of all affiliations. Large majorities of voters, especially democrats, side with Bernie on issues like raising the minimum wage to $15/hour, requiring employers to provide paid family and sick leave, opposing the Wall Street bailout, decriminalizing marijuana, raising taxes on wealthy and corporations, opposing the U.S. policy of interventionism and regime-change, and opposing the use of U.S. ground troops to defeat ISIS, to name a few. These are progressive values that appeal widely across demographics, but, unfortunately, not to Hillary Clinton. Her proposals on many issues amount to less-than-half measures and premature compromises which will translate to very little, if any, substantive change in the status quo. She is a hawkish neoconservative on foreign policy, a corporatist neoliberal on economic policy and a moderate centrist on domestic and social policy; not exactly the standard bearer for most democratic voters. (If youre curious which candidate best represents your views on the issues, take this quiz at isidewith.com)
Many in the democratic base prefer Bernies ideas and stances on the issues to Hillarys, but choose to vote for her because they think she has a better shot at defeating the eventual republican nominee. This is false. For months, polling of hypothetical general election match ups between the democratic and republican candidates consistently show Bernie Sanders beating Trump, Cruz and Kasich by wider margins than Hillary Clinton. According to HuffPost Pollsters aggregated favorability polling, Bernie has a +8.7 rating compared to Hillarys -13 rating. In a recent Bloomberg Politics poll, Sanders pulled ahead of Clinton nationally among democrats, 49-48 percent. The same poll showed that 64 percent think that Bernie Sanders is the more honest and trustworthy candidate, whereas only 25 percent feel that way about Clinton. With ongoing scandals, including foreign government arms deals for Clinton Foundation donations and an FBI criminal investigation, its easy to see why that distrust exists.
The other big reason given by democrats for choosing Clinton over Sanders is they think she has better foreign policy experience. Serving as Secretary of State for four years certainly gives her an advantage in that category, that is, until you look at her judgement during that time. In 2009, she legitimized the coup which ousted democratically elected Honduran President Manuel Zelaya. That country is now one of the most violent in the world. In 2011, she played a central role in the ousting of Col. Muammar Gaddafi, later laughing about it saying, We came, we saw, he died! Libya is now a stronghold for ISIS and other terrorist groups. In 2012, she pushed hard for the Obama administration to arm the Syrian rebels, another blatant attempt at regime-change. Now she is calling for a no-fly zone in Syria and the possibility of U.S. ground troops. Apart from further entrenching our armed forces in yet another Middle Eastern quagmire, her proposals have a very real chance at sparking a war with Russia. Oh, and did I mention she voted for the Iraq war? That too.
If you are a democrat who does not want to send our brave men and women in uniform to endless interventionist wars of regime-change, vote for Bernie Sanders. If you are a democrat who thinks that foreign policy judgement is more important than foreign policy experience, vote for Bernie Sanders. If you are a democrat who believes the most important issue is beating the republican candidate and regaining democratic majorities in the U.S. House and Senate, vote for Bernie Sanders. He is the only candidate at the helm of a political revolution bringing in millions of new voters who have previously given up on the political process. Bernie has the overwhelming support of Independents, millennials and the progressive base, and one third of his supporters have reported they will not vote for Hillary if she becomes the nominee, even to prevent a Trump presidency.
(snip)
Voting for Bernie Sanders in the democratic primaries is a win-win for democrats. He has a better chance of beating the eventual republican nominee, he has better judgement in matters of foreign policy, and he better represents the American publics views on a host of issues important to democrats. If he ends up losing the nomination, youve still got Hillary to fall back on. So tell me, what do you have to lose?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/d-c-rutledge/voting-for-bernie-sanders-is-a-win-win-for-democrats_b_9548640.html
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)After months or Hill advocacy, you can hear a little edge of excitement in the announcers' voices.
He is taking off! So of course the opposition wants to stop it as quickly as possible!
Ain'ta gonna happen.
senz
(11,945 posts)The OP explains it well.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)it will be a win win for all
even wall street will win - just not like they want
senz
(11,945 posts)His ideas are people-centered ideas that will return us to our original course before corporate sharks took over our government.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Tx Uncle Joe great article
proving that there is every reason to vote for Bernie!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Bernie's no McGovern. Bernie is vital and clear in his message and intent. Big difference.
Nice try, but: NO.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)landslide).
senz
(11,945 posts)"Real liberals can't win! Only newfangled Third Way/DLC, corporate Dems can win! We gotta sell out our values or we're goners!"
I should have known.
Well here's the news for you: Bernie excites even non-Democratic working people. His appeal is across the board, not just to a tiny pure demographic of old leftists and hippies. Corporatism is being exposed for what it is -- all across the political landscape.
The tide is turning, Hoyt.
BTW, if that is a photo of Woody Guthrie in your avatar, is entirely too ironic to stomach.
senz
(11,945 posts)He polls far better than Hill against Republicans.
Just won't work, Hoyt.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)No thanks.
I voted for McGovern, and would do so again under the same circumstances.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 28, 2016, 03:58 PM - Edit history (1)
I'm actually for single payer -- have been since early 1980s -- and a decent education for everyone. But, Sanders isn't being honest about the cost of providing these things and the revenue his proposals can raise without impacting other aspects of the economy. It's easy for him to say he is going to cut healthcare expenditures annually from $3 Trillion to $1.38 Trillion, but only the gullible believe it.
If he wants to come out and say, we are going to insure everyone, cut out deductibles and coinsurance, cover all drugs, have no utilization review, refuse any care, etc., I might well be for it if he also says your taxes will go up proportionately and it will be substantially more than I've been saying. He's not doing that.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)system.
Uncle Joe
(58,469 posts)The current system is dysfunctional, inefficient and corruptive.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)A country with no cancer would be great too, but . . . . . .
I think adding a Public Option to ACA and more subsidies, will get us there quicker than starting all over.
Uncle Joe
(58,469 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)..."rather than scrapping it and letting the GOPers give us a voucher system."
Bernie is an experienced politician. No way he would start out by "scrapping" the ACA, and then try and pass single payer. The ACA would stay in place until something else passed, if it ever did, which we all know is not likely without a big change in the makeup of Congress.
Look, it's okay if you don't like him making bold proposals. Great, looks like you're a good fit for the timid (domestically, anyway) candidate, Hillary Clinton. But try and refrain from lying.
If you want to claim that you are not lying about this then by all means, provide a link where Bernie says he will scrap the ACA before he has a single payer system in place, or will do so if he is unable to achieve single payer.
Waiting...
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)He couldn't even convince them to keep studying it. He might be a US senator, but he should have been involved in that important state legislation.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...and going into neener-neener-neener mode. Not that it's surprising; it is par for the course.
But the LIE you are promoting is that he will "scrap" the ACA. He never said that, no one believes that, but some are willing to put it out there in hopes that people will believe that is how it would go down.
You ought to be ashamed, but it seems you are incapable of that emotion.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)any faster, if as fast, as Clinton.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)So does my nose.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)The hands-down winner is Bernie.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Electing Bernie Sanders would be a suicide for democrats.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Hillary has not laid a glove on him. Trump will not be so kind.
Bernie will be bloodied, bruised and his wall-street message will be unrecognizable after one round with Trump. Then the revolution will be tarred, feathered, put on a donkey and taken on a parade of ridicule.
Trump (or any republican) will keep calling him communist. The nuance of "democratic socialist" won't fly -- it doesn't fly with me. The guy spent time in a communist kibbutz in Israel, hates rich people and met with Daniel Ortega and Fidel Castro -- not to mention had his honeymoon in Moscow. I don't trust that he or a lot of supporters believe in democracy. They want free stuff from rich people, using torches and pitchforks if necessary.
It is seen on DU every day as any post critical of Bernie is swarmed, stalked and hidden. There is no room for discussion. "Bow before Bernie or you'll be silenced" is the attitude. Trump doesn't have to worry about that.
Unfortunately, the detachment from reality is cultivated from silencing all opposition and creating a toxic echo chamber that makes people oblivious to the skills of Trump and his soundbites. Don't forget that Trump has destroyed major players like Jeb and Chris Christie already.
Now, don't come back with "but but Trump will do that to Hillary too" posts. Yes, he will do that to Hillary but the Clinton machine is much much stronger and skillful in dealing with it.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)So, if we are fortunate, and Bernie is elected, how will that "destroy the Democratic Party"?
BTW. in my 15 years here, I've alerted one exactly one post which was blatantly racist and had nothing to do with politics or elections. I've never put anyone on ignore because I like hearing opposing views.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Trump will destroy him if nominated.
Fortunately, Bernie won't get the nomination.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)admit it. (Pretty much the same situation the Republicans are in)
After all, they already have theirs. Why do you need to be a copy cat?