2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAs a person new to voting and politics (due to cynicism), I find the vote-splainin' frustrating!
It is very rude and condescending to be told that the values and principles I based my vote on are selfish or that I am to blame for the outcome of an election if it ends up with candidates I have no desire to vote for.
It is NOT selfish to vote based on the values and principles you hold dear. And I think the Hillary supporters who harp on this attack should reconsider their actions because it turns off voters even more.
I think a candidate must earn people's votes, not having an R next to your name is not good enough.
So next time when you think about denigrating someone's vote consider what kind of damage you are causing to the general election.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)Fine. If Hillary wins don't vote her. Don't use your threats of withholding your vote as a reason I should vote for your candidate over my candidate.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)I said plain and simple, votes have to be earned, they are not automatic (at least for me).
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Take your own advice.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)I think Bernie would be ineffective as President but at least get the Supreme Court nominees right. I think Trump or Cruz would be a disaster.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Hillary would be just as disastrous on the issues that matter to me.
Where does that leave me? I'm not willing to follow the party down the road they're heading. I care too much to vote party over people.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)Your choice doesn't influence my choice.
Just because you are threatening to not vote for my candidate doesn't make me more likely to vote for yours.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)In my world, people don't threaten, they just do.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)Again, I don't listen to people with guns to their own heads.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)the one pointing a gun to my head.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)I said I don't give a shit what you do and I told you why I don't give a shit.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Nothing shows you don't care as much as not leaving it alone. Really. Tell yourself that.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)Not the other way around.
unapatriciated
(5,390 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:48 AM - Edit history (1)
No one in this thread has told you who to vote for nor are they threatening not to vote in the GE.
We have primaries for a reason. It is so we might nominate the candidate that best represents our party's platform and what we dems have stood for since FDR. You are the one who jumped into this thread with anger and accusations.
We are not asking you to listen we are asking you to stop with the false rhetoric.
Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)If you don't vote for my candidate I will do X with my vote. My response is oh well.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)really?
Your replies state otherwise...
unapatriciated
(5,390 posts)dramatically accused everyone of doing. You're a hoot.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)electorate; they blast vitriol against policies that they adopt March of the following year, and blame us for election losses if we express disappointment while their lackeys jeer at the stoopid lefties
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)I didn't know they lost so many state seats... What the hell is going on?
MisterP
(23,730 posts)because a real principled liberal would annoy the donors; at the other end they're used to blaming the voters for absolutely anything--it was the voters, not Katherine Harris; it was the voters, not Joe Lieberman; it was the voters, not John Kerry; it was the voters, not DWS
Hydra
(14,459 posts)They are looking at taking over for the GOP, and in the interim they are sinking the progressives and others who are not part of the "club." You can see it happening here too.
At some point in the near future, the DWSs of our party will be the norm.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)eom
Hydra
(14,459 posts)The Third Way are the attempting to be outer party- the ones who do the heavy lifting for the people in power and get some benefits from it. The Inner party are the people who pay them (or shoot them in the back of the head later) and who have the actual control.
In other words, they're a bunch of suckers. We know the Inner Party feeds off of the outer party as much as the do the Proles.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Is stop using the "______ 'splaining" idiom. It's just stupid and out of control.
It's was cute once. Not any more.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)They have anxiety. They can't fix it with their vote, so THEY need you to fix it!
You see... they NEED A FIX!. Actually, they -MUST- have a fix.
'
They so worry, and they want a win. You know how it is to WANT what you think you may not get...
It just makes them WANT MORE. Really want More And MORE!
But they only have their own votes and those are sort of well, less filling and don't taste great.
So not satisfying...so they -MUST- have yours.
And if you don't cheerfully give it...then clearly -YOU- don't love them like a real democrat would.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)... but you have to consider that there are some people who are genuinely afraid of a Trump victory. Here's a true story: A Muslim woman is riding the subway in Boston. Someone gets nervous (perhaps someone mentally ill) because the Muslim woman carries a large bag and literally screams for help. A few men go up to the Muslim woman and without her permission search her bag. It's such a bizarre, scary scene, no one does anything. That's a true story told to me by a friend of that woman. Both the person who told me the story and the victim are now both afraid to ride the train, even though they must every day to go to work. That is Trump's America. Now, if you fear Trump in that way, then anyone who does not help defeat Trump is living selfishly in the world of privilege or is a bigot. But, I do see your point -- you have to reach your decision on your own, without feeling forced into it. That's counterproductive.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)I am part of the LGBTQ community and know very well the damage Repukes can cause. A discrimination law almost passed in my state, if not for the Governor vetoing it today.
The problem I feel is that if we don't stand up and demand (in the event Clinton is the nominee) that the Democratic party adopt at least some of Sanders platform and create some way to make people who don't trust Clinton to have any confidence it will mean anything then we will continue the march to the right.
That is why I am very happy that Sanders is staying in the race to the convention because he can force his demands into the party platform. What happens at the convention in the event of a Clinton nomination will have a big effect on my comfort level for voting for Clinton.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)I'm 51% for Sanders, 49% for Clinton, and very much want Sanders to stay in so that he can extract concessions, especially in terms of giving progressives more influence in the Party. And that's great news about Georgia. What a surprise!
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)unapatriciated
(5,390 posts)used live in Marietta, now in Wilmington NC. both states passed ass backward laws. Getting read to move back to the west coast, Portland , Or
Hopefully NC will do the same as Georgia.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)That "Bernie can't win" meme is a false talking point.
If people are really afraid of Trump winning then they should be campiagning for Bernie, the strongest candidate against him.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)If you candidate can't convince voters to vote for them because of their positions on issues, then you have no one to blame but yourself. And people who look for someone else to blame are losers who don't want to accept responsibility for themselves.
Say hello to Jimmy Carter down there.