Bernie supporters in closed primary states r having their party affiliation changed without consent

[kgnu_fan]

Bernie supporters in closed primary states are having their party affiliation changed without consent. Not just AZ.
https://twitter.com/MichaelSalamone/status/714643098941460481/photo/1

[djean111]

1. Counting down until someone's supporters sneer at this as conspiracy theories.

Like they know they don't have to be concerned about it, almost!

[Cobalt Violet]

2. Once a cheater, always a cheater!

I can't stand it anymore!

[GeorgiaPeanuts]

3. Is this why the DNC/Clinton Campaign....

Have refused to comply with a full investigation into the voter database breaches between campaigns?

[Merryland]

6. pretty sure that's why. unfreakingbelievable. n/t

[Chasstev365]

4. If this can be proven

Bernie needs to confront her on it NOW!

[Gwhittey]

7. He can not

Because then M$M will just report on how he has sour grapes.
They have not reported on one single thing comping out of Arizona. Like many do not know that Az Sanders HQ had someone hack the supporter list for AZ. Then the AZ voter website having some serious exploits open to SQL injection attacks. So now you have a list of people that donated to Sanders and their IDs. You have a means to exploit the AZ states voter database so then you now can change people from (D) to (I).

[upaloopa]

5. How the hell does someone know that a voter is a Bernie supporter to change their party affiliation

This stuff is getting pretty ludicrous.

[-none]

8. There it is.

All they had to do is look at the Bernie lists during the breach in the DNC servers. That breach worked both ways. If the Bernie employee has not noticed it, then no one would have known about it and we would not have a clue on how they could have known who the Bernie supporter are.

[Dem2]

13. This was changed last August according to the tweet

[upaloopa]

19. This is growing by leaps and bounds.

[Matt_in_STL]

9. Bernie's DNC database, donor records...there are plenty of ways to identify enough of them

[upaloopa]

20. I don't buy any of this conspiracy bull shit

[Matt_in_STL]

24. I don't think anyone is asking you to. Just pointing out it is possible.

I am sure you don't believe any of the Republican vote changing or election fraud conspiracies then either.

[Dem2]

10. That story was posted here already

I was hoping for a somewhat thorough analysis of the situation, not the same anecdotal story that's been debated here previously.

Also, the theory above about the data breech and/or Hillary somehow involved don't make sense since the voters registration was changed last August. Nobody could possibly have known back then that this would become a competitive race.

[NorthCarolina]

11. The establishment will use every trick available to them.

Altering voter registration info is just one of those tricks at their disposal.

Bernie wants to turn their "public service job" into an actual Public Service Job the like of which he has been serving for 30+ years.

Bernie has been in the public service domain for at least as long as the Clintons. One family got EXTREMELY rich from their public service duties, whereas one didn't. Ever wonder why?

[All in it together]

12. How despicable, If this is true, and it's looking that way.

This needs to be investigated, another thing to investigate. Why not just vote Bernie instead!
Trouble is if you steal an election you get to keep it. Just ask the Repubs

[NorthCarolina]

14. It has become quite evident what the firewall breach in the DNC voter database

was created for.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

16. This happened BEFORE the breach. nt

[jeff47]

17. There was more than one breach. (nt)

[Dr Hobbitstein]

18. This happened in August.

The timelines don't match up. And the "other breach" was an issue with unrelated software and was reported to the DNC (ie, NOT the NGP/VAN database). It was NOT the NGP/VAN breach that so many have donned tinfoil over.

If you want to don tinfoil to think it's some widespread mass conspiracy, that's cool. Just expect to be called out.

[jeff47]

21. Again, there was more than one NGP/VAN breach.

The reason given for "See what we can do with this breach" was because it had already happened before. It's also extremely unlikely that there were only two breaches.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

22. Link to the other breach. nt

[jeff47]

23. It's in the lawsuit against the DNC.

Mentions previous breaches, going back to the 2008 Obama campaign.

Snopes has a decent overview in their "undetermined" section
http://www.snopes.com/bernie-sanders-campaign-data-breach-controversy/

[Dr Hobbitstein]

35. Undetermined being the operative word. nt

[Kip Humphrey]

29. There was a DNC data breach in August.

[Dr Hobbitstein]

34. Not NGP/Van.

Which is the breach that the whole "conspiracy" is based on.

[MineralMan]

15. Just Bernie Supporters? Do you have any evidence of that?

If so, please link to that evidence.

[salinsky]

30. I believe there's a term for that type of evidence ...

... and, that term is "anecdotal" ...

... but, they've got a tweet, ...

... so, there's that.

[amborin]

25. K&R and check status here: http://www.canivote.org/

[RandySF]

26. Sure

All those county clerks activated their tin-foil proof rays to discern who's voting for whom.

[jillan]

27. Did you know there was a breach of 191 million Voter Registrations Leaked? Here-

http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/12/28/us-voter-database-leak/#7a867cff1bb9

A whitehat hacker has uncovered a database sitting on the Web containing various pieces of personal information related to 191 million American citizens registered to vote. On top of the concomitant problems of disclosing such a significant leak to that many people, no one knows who is actually responsible for the misconfiguration that left the data open to anyone.

Researcher Chris Vickery, who this month found myriad databases left open to all and sundry, told FORBES he has his hands on all 300GB of voter data, which includes names, home addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, party affiliations, and logs of whether or not they had voted in primary or general elections. The data appears to date back to 2000. It does not contain financial data or social security numbers.

We have a problem.

[kgnu_fan]

28. kick

[bbrady42]

31. So how does that identify someone as a Bernie supporter? n/t

[ViseGrip]

32. Under 45?

[jillan]

33. Did you know know that Hillary voters were also impacted? Oh yeah. They have been screaming

just as loudly as the rest.

One of the most passionate 2 minute speeches at the meeting with the AZ elections committee came from a republican.

This was not just about Bernie supporters.

[NorthCarolina]

36. Why would the establishment NOT use any tactic in their arsenal?

Bernie represents a complete rejection of their chosen income stream. Desiring to turn elected positions with massive access to personal gain into nothing more than public service jobs earning whatever congressional salaries pay. If he prevails NOBODY will spend millions to acquire a public service job that pays only six figures annually.