2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Problem With Clinton's Calls for Sanders to Adjust His Tone. This may backfire.
http://fortune.com/2016/03/29/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-2/The Problem With Clinton's Calls for Sanders to Adjust His Tone
Statements like Benensons make it seem like Clinton and her supporters think she should be able to run for the Democratic nomination unchallenged.
Weve seen this before, and it didnt work well for Clinton. In 2008, Hillary Clinton was seen by many as the inevitable Democratic candidate. Many campaign watchers have argued this is why her team in Iowa wasnt as sophisticated as Barack Obamas, allowing Obama to win that states caucuses, which ultimately catapulted him to the nomination and the presidency.
Now, history seems to be repeating itself, at least partly. Clinton likely thought shed have the nomination sewed up by now, if not much earlier in the primary race. She is clearly done debating with Sanders. But for one of Clintons main advisors to call out Sanders for his tone rings hollow. Sure, Sanders has been negative towards Clinton; he is, after all, running against her. But when you compare the tone on the Democratic side to that of the Republican race, or to almost any political campaign, it has been downright collegial. The Vermont senator has lobbed almost no personal attacks against Clinton. And Sanders hasnt hit her on the e-mail scandal or Benghazi.
Clinton is still the frontrunner for the nomination and it is going to be a long and difficult general election. But as much as she may want the primary to be over, it isnt.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Hillary never said there would be a debate in NY. She only said a debate in April. Sanders was FORCEFULLY DEMANDING a debate in NYC for his own political gain. He has been running a negative campaign with his paid surrogates. He wants to set the time and date of the debate. Who the F left all this authority up to him? Then he takes it to the public to try and make it look like Hillary won't debate. "DEBATE ME IN NY or I will publicly call you out!" He looks and feels like an aggressive bully. I'm glad he is showing the public this crazy display. That and the cluster fuck of claims by Devine that they did not compete in states Hilary won. LMFAO
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)I agree with Bernie that it should be but I realize that isn't guaranteed.
It's the issue of the campaign saying that he needs to change his tone before they would agree to the scheduled debate. That shows extreme weaknesses on Hillary's part and people are noticing.
Whether or not NY thinks it's important that the debate is held there and before the primary is up to them. I do think it will be tho.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)No one should adhere to demands from a bully.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)She can't be tuff and weak at the same time.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)its being tough on a bully. It's working since Sanders camp is in such a fit.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)I'm not saying he's soft and cuddly tho either.
I hope you aren't calling me a bully
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Clinton speaking to an AIDS activist who had a few months left to live:
So tone? Bullying? Seriously?
Hillary 2008- Honestly, I just believe that this is the most important job in the world, its the toughest job in the world, you should be willing to campaign for every vote, you should be willing to debate anytime, anywhere."
She made no mention of tonal requirements.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Trump will be hysterical
Stocking up on the popcorn
grasswire
(50,130 posts)..I am picturing you in a room filled with popcorn by now. LOL.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)(And that is real. From time to time I buy it for mostly a conure)
grasswire
(50,130 posts)They seem to like it pretty well, too.
KPN
(15,670 posts)Lol. My how I wish her campaign would say that ... but if enough Hillies do, that'll suffice. Talk about backfire!
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Really pathetic. Poor, helpless, maligned, misunderstood Hillary
pat_k
(9,313 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:19 PM - Edit history (1)
I mean what is she gonna say to Trump? Is Hillary gonna back down again?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)you are probably correct.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)emails, I am stunned that this schmuck had the gall to call tone here. He has been a gent all the way through. she and her team don't like what he says. That's content, not tone and she looks weak and petulant having her people say this.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)I would love to see thousands of these posted across the state.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)He wants Hillary to do things that are in his favor.
He should be willing to give as well as take
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Surprise, surprise!
Avalon Sparks
(2,569 posts)It's not in her favor....
Makes me wonder why you support her.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)mac56
(17,575 posts)Avalon Sparks
(2,569 posts)LOL
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)That was a lie?
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)You had better change your tone, young man.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)They used to beat the shit out of my left hand when I naturally wanted to use it for writing, art, whatever. I still recall clearly the 3 foot steel ruler they used on the "Devil's hand."
If I persisted, I got to kneel on hard peas in the corner. Damn sadists.
Worried senior
(1,328 posts)with the inquisition in my opinion.
How old were your six? Terrible way to teach a child but I went to Catholic school too and had a couple nuns that hated me for whatever reason. I tried.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)That's what Chris Matthews said! He said it sounded like what a nun would say.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Clinton leads him in NY polling by roughly 30 points. She doesn't need to face him, while he is desperate for free airtime in an expensive media market.
This isn't everyone's first election, only Sanders supporters. Most of us know what's what, despite all the spin. Sanders has privately acknowledged that he's going to lose, otherwise his campaign wouldn't be floating such dumb ideas like that he "chose not to compete in 8 states" or that "super-delegates will flip to the candidate with the least votes, least wins, and least pledged delegates."
It's just shameful he won't be honest with his supporters about what he's already admitted to himself.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)No.
No.
No, and,
No.
There, I fixed your post for you.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Since she agreed to the debate. If she's so confident, she would agree to the debate. Another excuse that is as hollow as her promises.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)you're using actually mean here, friend. Consult a dictionary.
Being "confident" doesn't mean allowing your opponent to dictate your actions. Far from it.
TheBlackAdder
(28,239 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Seriously, truthiness is not going to win Sanders a pre-NY debate. Enough already.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)but it looks weak and bad that Hillary refuses to debate. That's what it looks like. You may argue with yourselves but to most people, she looks weak by refusing. period.
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)It seems like ages ...
Byebye ...
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)If she genuinely has a 30 point lead, then shouldn't that be because of her policies and positions? Yet apparently talking about them and contrasting them with her opponent is a risk to her? How does that work exactly? If she's a strong candidate, wouldn't a debate allow her to extend her lead?
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)It also gives the public the opportunity to see Democratic positions and contrast them against the constant stream of Trump.
longship
(40,416 posts)David Brock posts an attack piece impugning Bernie Sanders' relationship with Jane implying that she is abused. They, in part do this by misquoting Bernie. AKA all lying!
On the same damned day, HRC justifies weaseling out of a NY debate because she doesn't like the "tone" of Bernie's campaign.
It's kind of amazing that the discordance of her campaign is echoing all over the place and she blames it on Bernie, and his wife, Jane.
The irony is thick. And the HRC supporters don't see it at all. Nor does HRC.
One doesn't know whether to laugh out loud or to break down crying at such a sad state of affairs.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Instead, I am committing time and money to the BERN
longship
(40,416 posts)The primary here is over (MI -- yea! Bernie). Unfortunately I am not too mobile. But I'll be ready to go for November when it comes time.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)it warps space-time. It's a terrible burden for her, because people who don't understand see the distortions that her mere presence causes to perceived reality as lying.
It's really just evidence of her massive greatness.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,208 posts)She doesn't have to debate. Heck, she doesn't even have to run ads. Her name's on the ballot, what MORE do these foolish little people want?
Jeb! may have some helpful insight into that attitude.
Don't you sass me, mister! Go to your room!
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Clinton's camp has statisticians that have been right nearly 100% of the time. This shows that the race is much closer than most polls, and she is afraid of him swaying any voters.
Just saying...
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Our nominee will probably face Trump, so it's not a gig for those who can't handle respectful debate. How can she run against Donald if she can't deal with a nice guy like Bernie? Trust me, Trump will never get sick of hearing about her e-mails. Never tire of mentioning them.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)JesterCS
(1,827 posts)Been a member since 06 and never put anyone on ignore. This primary, I'm up to almost a dozen on ignore. Some really nasty Clintonites here