2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton Foundation failed to disclose 1,100 foreign donations. So much for transparency
The reason this is a politically explosive revelation is because the Clinton Foundation promised to disclose its donors as a condition of Hillary Clinton becoming secretary of state. Shortly after Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, the Clinton Foundation signed a memorandum of understanding with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year. The agreement stipulates that the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative (as the charity was then known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow the same protocols.
It hasnt.
Giustra says thats because Canadas federal privacy law forbids CGEP, a Canadian-registered charity, from revealing its donors. A memo he provided explaining the legal rationale cites CGEPs fiduciary obligations to its contributors and Canadas Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure Act. We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the names of our donors, he says.
On Saturday, responding to the Times story, Maura Pally, the acting CEO of the Clinton Foundation, issued a statement echoing this assertion: This is hardly an effort on our part to avoid transparencyunlike in the U.S., under Canadian law, all charities are prohibited from disclosing individual donors without prior permission from each donor.
Also on Bloomberg Politics: The Definitive Hillary Clinton Scouting Report, by Mark Halperin and John Heilemann
Canadian tax and privacy law experts were dubious of this claim. Len Farber, former director of tax policy at Canada's Department of Finance, said he wasn't aware of any tax laws that would prevent the charity from releasing its donors' names. "There's nothing that would preclude them from releasing the names of donors," he said. "It's entirely up to them."
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-04-29/clinton-foundation-failed-to-disclose-1-100-foreign-donations
How shocking that Clinton's Cheerleader didn't raise this issue.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
peacebird
(14,195 posts)THAT is what I want to know. It would be one thing if all these foreign govts had been donating like amounts BEFORE she was nominated to be SoS.....
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)The campaigns January financial disclosure filing listed contributions from foreign nationals and unregistered political committees, the FEC said. Other contributions came from donors who exceeded the $2,700 per-election limit.
But it's OK when Bernie does it, right? Because hypocrisy is your new progressive platform, as far as I can tell.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Just a FYI but I would watch your sources before you get raked over the coals for posting links to RW sites, which WFB certainly is.
OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)Emilie Teresa Stigliani, Free Press Staff Writer 12:58 p.m. EST March 1, 2016
[font size=3]Bernie Sanders received a warning from the Federal Election Commission, citing problems with his campaign's February finance report.
The letter states the report lists amounts of contributions, receipts, expenses and disbursements that "appear to be incorrect."
The letter also cites possible impermissible contributions that exceed the allowed limit per election cycle ($2,700 for individuals) along with donations that come from outside the United States and from unregistered political committees.
The FEC sent the letter Thursday to the campaign asking for more information regarding the report filed Feb. 20. The letter warned: "Failure to adequately respond by the response date noted above could result in an audit or enforcement action."
[/font][/font]
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Better.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)the names, etc. of his donors are on his FEC submissions. Hillary gets money that passes thru a Canadian "money washing machine" -- original donors are not reported to FEC. So, I'm making a legal donation to his campaign now to help replace the money being returned.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)are errors they will be corrected. This is apples and oranges re: Hillary and her dishonest dealings and YUGGGEE amounts of donations that were overwhelming to say the least for Bernie.
GeorgeGist
(25,326 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Who cares how old it is? Is it relevant to this election? Yup.
Response to pinebox (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
pinebox
(5,761 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)y'know, just keeping the good old American tradition of financially sleeping with our enemies alive.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)to the Clinton Foundation.
http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187
<Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States' oil-rich ally in the Middle East.
Israeli officials were agitated, reportedly complaining to the Obama administration that this substantial enhancement to Saudi air power risked disrupting the region's fragile balance of power. The deal appeared to collide with the State Departments documented concerns about the repressive policies of the Saudi royal family.
But now, in late 2011, Hillary Clintons State Department was formally clearing the sale, asserting that it was in the national interest. At press conferences in Washington to announce the departments approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been a top priority for Clinton personally. Shapiro, a longtime aide to Clinton since her Senate days, added that the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army have excellent relationships in Saudi Arabia.
These were not the only relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.>
And of course, the Hillary and the Clinton Foundation didn't just collect from foreign governments, they also collected ample commissions from Boeing and other defense contractors for facilitating sales. And we know from the debates that Hillary champions the Bank of Boeing, otherwise known as the Export-Import Bank.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/for-hillary-clinton-and-boeing-a-beneficial-relationship/2014/04/13/21fe84ec-bc09-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html
On a trip to Moscow early in her tenure as secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton played the role of international saleswoman, pressing Russian government officials to sign a multibillion-dollar deal to buy dozens of aircraft from Boeing.
A month later, Clinton was in China, where she jubilantly announced that the aerospace giant would be writing a generous check to help resuscitate floundering U.S. efforts to host a pavilion at the upcoming Worlds Fair.
Boeing, she said, has just agreed to double its contribution to $2 million.
Clinton did not point out that, to secure the donation, the State Department had set aside ethics guidelines that first prohibited solicitations of Boeing and then later permitted only a $1 million gift from the company. Boeing had been included on a list of firms to be avoided because of its frequent reliance on the government for help negotiating overseas business and concern that a donation could be seen as an attempt to curry favor with U.S. officials.>
Ethics guidelines? We don't need no stinkin' ethics guidelines!
How is all of this anything but bribery?
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Minus all the things that made Shadowrun cool. (I'd vote for a dragon if he were running.)
MisterP
(23,730 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)If Hillary or a repub gets in, I want the dragons to come like immediately.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)or a white hole gets tossed into it and the Urth floods!
leveymg
(36,418 posts)and that pass-through wasn't reported by the Clinton Foundation in violation of federal tax law:
One money-laundering expert and former intelligence officer based in the Middle East who had access to the foundations confidential banking information told me that members of royal families in Middle Eastern countries, including Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, have donated money to the CGEP that has then been sluiced through to the Clinton Foundation. . . There are other signs that the Clintons and their foundation may have violated federal, state, and international law. Under Treasury Department money-laundering rules, the Clinton Foundation is required to disclose every financial account it holds abroad. It has failed to disclose an account linked to the CGEP on its past eight tax returns.
randome
(34,845 posts)But that might provide context, and we can't have that, can we?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
Scuba
(53,475 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)And just because Canada has a law forbidding donors being revealed isn't much of a 'crime', from what I can see.
Although obviously there is some disagreement on whether it's prohibited or not.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
Scuba
(53,475 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)Can lead a horse to water, can't make them drink. You can show the truth, can't make people see it...
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)in their devotional echo-chamber.
The rest of the world doesn't care and moves on.
revbones
(3,660 posts)but then sprinkling it with "sparklepony" word sauce makes it ok.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)William K. Black helped put the S&L crooks behind bars in the 1990s as a regulator and forensic economist for the SEC. He also helped Iceland put its banksters behind bars, but for some reason, the Federal government failed to call on him for help in the great Bankster Bailout of 2008. He knows a bit about Inspector Generals and Control Fraud.
The Clintons Have Not Changed: The Clintonian War on the IGs
By William K. Black
February 23, 2016 Bloomington, MN
Secretary Hillary Clinton is asking Democratic voters to believe that she has experienced a Road to Damascus conversion from her roots as a leader of the New Democrats the Wall Street wing of the Democratic Party. When exactly this conversion occurred is never stated, but an interesting fact has emerged that demonstrates it did not occur during her service as the Secretary of State. A Wall Street Journal story provides the key facts, but none of the analysis.
Newly released emails indicate that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top staff were involved in the selection process for the State Departments internal watchdog, a position that ultimately went unfilled throughout her four-year tenure.
The WSJs angle is that such involvement in the selection of the Inspector General (IG) is a threat to the IGs vital independence. True, and also true as the story notes that Hillary was far from rare as an agency or department head in seeking to select behind the scenes the supposedly independent IGs.
The function of the IG is to speak truth to power. Naturally, power hates IGs with a purple passion. Government leaders are most likely to hate having its abuses made public by IG when the government leader is secretly acting in concert with immensely powerful private leaders for their mutual benefit at the expense of the public.
What the WSJ missed is that the Clintons, for decades, have sought to destroy the independence and effectiveness of the IGs precisely because of the threat that they pose of blowing the whistle on these abuses. The Obama administration, of course, is famous for its prosecutions of those who blow the whistle on such abuses. The real story is not that Hillary attempted to select a lap dog as IG the real story is that for her entire tenure as Secretary, four years, she left unfilled the leadership position of the only institution in the State Department dedicated to maintaining integrity and preventing the abuse of public power to aid cronies. That aid, of course, comes with the clear expectation that the cronies will make the head of the State Department wealthy as soon as she or he steps down. There is no possible defense for that, and it does not happen accidentally. The primary blame goes to President Obama, who made no nomination for the position for the entire four years. It wasnt Republican intransigence that explains this scandal.
CONTINUED...
http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2016/03/clintons-not-changed-clintonian-war-igs.html#more-10101
Bill Black is one of "those" economists who won't play ball with the money crowd. Why? He. Has. Integrity.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)astounding, isn't it?
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Because my head explodes, and I have only been paying attention for a few weeks!
grasswire
(50,130 posts)He knows how skeevy the Clintons are about transparency.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Here's more from a Harper's article that makes it clear that US law was continually violated in the Foundations filings for several years:
One money-laundering expert and former intelligence officer based in the Middle East who had access to the foundations confidential banking information told me that members of royal families in Middle Eastern countries, including Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, have donated money to the CGEP that has then been sluiced through to the Clinton Foundation. . . There are other signs that the Clintons and their foundation may have violated federal, state, and international law. Under Treasury Department money-laundering rules, the Clinton Foundation is required to disclose every financial account it holds abroad. It has failed to disclose an account linked to the CGEP on its past eight tax returns.
The Bloomberg article has been sanitized.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
frylock
(34,825 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)in Sub Saharan Africa and other Third World nations. Stop the political hate. You sound like a Republican.
frylock
(34,825 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Who knows where the rest goes? Most likely into someone's pockets.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)All in it together
(275 posts)And Clintons have investigation after investigation looking into their activities.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Or a hater, or a right wing troll, or a "Berniebro," or stupid.