Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh, my! ... (Original Post) 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 OP
Did you make sure to put on that neckbrace... This much spin is sure to give whiplash... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #1
He's desperate. senz Apr 2016 #3
No; but I AM amused. 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #5
Well ignorance can make life amusing... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #14
Logic: ur doin it wrong beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #21
1SBM ignorant? oh my you are so wrong. rbrnmw Apr 2016 #22
To be educated is to know one's own ignorances... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #25
I will not rise to the bait. 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #23
We found out today you are both ignorant and you do what your leaders tell you. Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #30
I'se sorry. I be fergit'in to mind myself. Thanks, (President) OBAMA! 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #34
Your cover is now entirely blown, calling 1strongblackman ignorant. Took a while but we know now Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #29
His post is ignorant... I'm not sure what cover has been blown? GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #31
DOUBLES down... Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #33
Okay... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #35
I am far from "ignorant" ... actually, I'm quite learned ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #37
But Sanders is a man. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #2
Yes he is! NWCorona Apr 2016 #8
Good idea; but, too late ... you've already started the spin! 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #4
In other words... HumanityExperiment Apr 2016 #6
And? NWCorona Apr 2016 #7
I know ... That's my point! 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #10
Ok I can understand that NWCorona Apr 2016 #17
Look up and down ... visit the GD-P ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #24
I have looked NWCorona Apr 2016 #28
Avocados at law. mac56 Apr 2016 #42
That was a good episode! NWCorona Apr 2016 #44
But, but but . . . you guys have been shouting for months that Bernie was so clean . . . brush Apr 2016 #15
So this law firm gives Bernie money? dogman Apr 2016 #36
Bernie gives the law firm money. But how can a candidate rail against corporate ties . . . brush Apr 2016 #45
I see agreat deal of difference between me giving some one money and them giving me money. dogman Apr 2016 #46
Perhaps not...lobbyist bundlers. nt jmg257 Apr 2016 #9
Do any of these companies give MONEY to the Sanders campaign? senz Apr 2016 #11
I don't know ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #16
But I bet people who work for them might. nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #49
It's worse....Bernie gives them money....nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #53
So you're using the guilt-by-association fallacy and you're shocked by what? Your own lack of logic? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #12
LOL ... Really? 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #18
That's how I originally felt about your op, Hector Projector, but it was too hard to resist. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #20
Right'O. 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #26
BS supporters use it all the time against Hillary...or haven't you noticed? Jitter65 Apr 2016 #50
Hillary is being criticized for receiving money from lobbyists. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #51
OMG Lawyers represent good and bad people alike?!?! HOLY SHIT! berni_mccoy Apr 2016 #13
I know ... who would'a thunk it ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #19
Who has complained about Hillary's campaign legal firm? dogman Apr 2016 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #41
As you've pointed out, you're smart. Therefore, you already know that your argument DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #59
Most people hate lawyers until they need them. Then they want the meanest lawyer they can find. Armstead Apr 2016 #27
You get NO argument from me on ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #39
Then I guess I don't understand your point Armstead Apr 2016 #40
He is trying to suggest... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #47
There would be 30 threads on this his if it were Clinton, and calls for indictment and Hoyt Apr 2016 #32
Bernie washed all their sins away. JoePhilly Apr 2016 #43
This is amusing Gothmog Apr 2016 #48
Great post k&r n/t cosmicone Apr 2016 #52
lol. your post proves you are just here to spam Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #54
And your post proves you're cosmicone Apr 2016 #55
nope. gotta hella big grin on my face actually Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #56
LMAO ..... this is too surreal cosmicone Apr 2016 #57
I wondered where you were going with your question earlier! Lucinda Apr 2016 #58
Don't hurt yourself. PowerToThePeople Apr 2016 #60
So looking forward to Bravenak's redundant "I GOP trolled DU 2016" reveal on election night. n/t ieoeja Apr 2016 #61
Wow, this distrortion is so beneath you I'm shocked. Scuba Apr 2016 #62
I'd rather talk about the candidate's own words and actions: Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #63
 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
14. Well ignorance can make life amusing...
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:41 PM
Apr 2016

Special interests are paying Clinton Campaign and Superpacs in the form of donations... In this case Sanders is paying a law firm for services rendered. If you can't see the difference then I am sorry the school system failed you so greatly.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
22. 1SBM ignorant? oh my you are so wrong.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:47 PM
Apr 2016

He is a very educated man, I guess you don't know so I am informing you.

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
25. To be educated is to know one's own ignorances...
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:50 PM
Apr 2016

There are plenty of subjects I am ignorant on, I'll admit. But this was just flat out misleading spin.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
30. We found out today you are both ignorant and you do what your leaders tell you.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:54 PM
Apr 2016

Did Jesse Jackson tell you to back talk the white folk?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
37. I am far from "ignorant" ... actually, I'm quite learned ...
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 05:08 PM
Apr 2016

That I can argue my point of disagreement, without calling you "ignorant" (implying some unestablished know or wisdom), says it all.

Now ... Please place me on ignore before you cross a line, and I read you for filth.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
10. I know ... That's my point!
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:39 PM
Apr 2016

Lobbyist lobby ... law firms lawyer ... rarely does a firm's client list represent a political statement.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
17. Ok I can understand that
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:43 PM
Apr 2016

was someone else bringing it up?

I would like to hire Nelson & Murdoch but it's hard to find firms like that.

brush

(53,871 posts)
15. But, but but . . . you guys have been shouting for months that Bernie was so clean . . .
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:41 PM
Apr 2016

and free of any corporate ties, while Hillary was virtually owned by corporations.

Please, please, please . . . tell us this is not true.

dogman

(6,073 posts)
36. So this law firm gives Bernie money?
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 05:06 PM
Apr 2016

And does work for him? That's a strange business model. I need a law firm like that.

brush

(53,871 posts)
45. Bernie gives the law firm money. But how can a candidate rail against corporate ties . . .
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 05:16 PM
Apr 2016

when he is tied to someone with corporate ties?

That's not six degrees of separation, it's one half of a degree.

Kinda close don't you think?

Wonder what kind of quid pro quo is afoot?

dogman

(6,073 posts)
46. I see agreat deal of difference between me giving some one money and them giving me money.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 05:19 PM
Apr 2016

The second is rare for me too.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
11. Do any of these companies give MONEY to the Sanders campaign?
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:39 PM
Apr 2016

But just about all the bad-guy companies contribute to Hillary, don't they?

That's not going away.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
16. I don't know ...
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:41 PM
Apr 2016

but I do know all the bad-guy firms contribute to a super-pac that benefits all Democrats ... except for maybe, Sanders.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
51. Hillary is being criticized for receiving money from lobbyists.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 05:46 PM
Apr 2016

The op thinks that using Bernie's lawyer's client list exposes hypocrisy, but it doesn't, it just makes Hillary's supporters look desperate to divert attention from this story.

Response to dogman (Reply #38)

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
59. As you've pointed out, you're smart. Therefore, you already know that your argument
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 08:30 PM
Apr 2016

is intellectually dishonest. What, did you think no one would point that out?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
27. Most people hate lawyers until they need them. Then they want the meanest lawyer they can find.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:51 PM
Apr 2016

And what, Sanders is supposed to ignore that basic reality?

Just like Tad Devine is no angel. But he makes damn good ads.

You find it funny that Sanders is smart enough to hire people who know what they're doing. But guess who calls the shots? He does.

But that's a whole lot different than a career of being enmeshed with bad actors and perpetuating a bad system as part of a campaign/politician's basic DNA.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
39. You get NO argument from me on ...
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 05:11 PM
Apr 2016
Most people hate lawyers until they need them. Then they want the meanest lawyer they can find.


Or, this:

Just like Tad Devine is no angel. But he makes damn good ads.


But that's not my point.
 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
47. He is trying to suggest...
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 05:24 PM
Apr 2016

That paying a law firm for legal services is the same as accepting donations from lobbyists from a special interest group. Disingenuous false equivalency

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
32. There would be 30 threads on this his if it were Clinton, and calls for indictment and
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:55 PM
Apr 2016

protests at her campaign speeches.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
54. lol. your post proves you are just here to spam
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 07:16 PM
Apr 2016

You should read the whole thread first. At least that might slow you down a little.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
56. nope. gotta hella big grin on my face actually
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 07:28 PM
Apr 2016

The tide has already turned. Feels the same as '08

thanks for your concern tho

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
62. Wow, this distrortion is so beneath you I'm shocked.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 08:58 AM
Apr 2016

You're generally a straight shooter; this post doesn't meet that standar.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
63. I'd rather talk about the candidate's own words and actions:
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 09:47 AM
Apr 2016

"It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan — in particular Mrs. Reagan — we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too." Hillary Clinton, March 2016

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Oh, my! ...