2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOh, my! ...
So Bernie's campaign counsel engages in lobbying for energy companies, advises the Banking industry, and does anti-union work!
http://www.gsblaw.com/services/election_and_political_law_public_policy_and_lobbying_58/
http://www.gsblaw.com/industries/financial_services/
http://www.gsblaw.com/industries/health_care/labor_relations_and_employment/
Perhaps, now, we can put the "HRC is connected to someone that worked for someone evil DU narrative to rest?
All large law firms, that are worth a hill of beans, work with/lobby for client in {insert evil industry here}.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Special interests are paying Clinton Campaign and Superpacs in the form of donations... In this case Sanders is paying a law firm for services rendered. If you can't see the difference then I am sorry the school system failed you so greatly.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)He is a very educated man, I guess you don't know so I am informing you.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)There are plenty of subjects I am ignorant on, I'll admit. But this was just flat out misleading spin.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Did Jesse Jackson tell you to back talk the white folk?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Are certain members above any criticism?
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)On to my ignore list you go.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)That I can argue my point of disagreement, without calling you "ignorant" (implying some unestablished know or wisdom), says it all.
Now ... Please place me on ignore before you cross a line, and I read you for filth.
LexVegas
(6,095 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)You'll be hearing from my attorneys.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)is this kitchen sink time?
Please explain this away:
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
https://theintercept.com/2016/03/09/hillary-clinton-wants-to-regulate-fracking-but-still-accepts-a-lot-of-fracking-money/
I'll wait...
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)They are lawyer's what do you expect?
Do you really want Hillary's client list brought up?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Lobbyist lobby ... law firms lawyer ... rarely does a firm's client list represent a political statement.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)was someone else bringing it up?
I would like to hire Nelson & Murdoch but it's hard to find firms like that.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)but somehow it's always "different."
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But I don't see anyone bashing Hillary's legal counsel.
mac56
(17,574 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)brush
(53,871 posts)and free of any corporate ties, while Hillary was virtually owned by corporations.
Please, please, please . . . tell us this is not true.
dogman
(6,073 posts)And does work for him? That's a strange business model. I need a law firm like that.
brush
(53,871 posts)when he is tied to someone with corporate ties?
That's not six degrees of separation, it's one half of a degree.
Kinda close don't you think?
Wonder what kind of quid pro quo is afoot?
dogman
(6,073 posts)The second is rare for me too.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)But just about all the bad-guy companies contribute to Hillary, don't they?
That's not going away.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)but I do know all the bad-guy firms contribute to a super-pac that benefits all Democrats ... except for maybe, Sanders.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)The is just too stupid to respond to.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The op thinks that using Bernie's lawyer's client list exposes hypocrisy, but it doesn't, it just makes Hillary's supporters look desperate to divert attention from this story.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)but, I guess it only goes one way.
dogman
(6,073 posts)And what was the complaint they made?
Response to dogman (Reply #38)
1StrongBlackMan This message was self-deleted by its author.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)is intellectually dishonest. What, did you think no one would point that out?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)And what, Sanders is supposed to ignore that basic reality?
Just like Tad Devine is no angel. But he makes damn good ads.
You find it funny that Sanders is smart enough to hire people who know what they're doing. But guess who calls the shots? He does.
But that's a whole lot different than a career of being enmeshed with bad actors and perpetuating a bad system as part of a campaign/politician's basic DNA.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Or, this:
But that's not my point.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)That paying a law firm for legal services is the same as accepting donations from lobbyists from a special interest group. Disingenuous false equivalency
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)protests at her campaign speeches.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Gothmog
(145,563 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)You should read the whole thread first. At least that might slow you down a little.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)The tide has already turned. Feels the same as '08
thanks for your concern tho
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)#feelthemath
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Well done!
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)This is pathetic. Almost as pathetic as HRC's campaign.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)You're generally a straight shooter; this post doesn't meet that standar.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan in particular Mrs. Reagan we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too." Hillary Clinton, March 2016