About Bernie, the NYDN editorial board doesn't mince words.
Ouch.
Although Sanders has vowed a shock-and-awe bank-busting campaign that would risk global financial chaos, he was at a loss to show how he would execute the assault or to cite legal authority for such sweeping and unprecedented exercise of presidential power.
Although Sanders has repeatedly said, “It is an outrage that not one major Wall Street executive has gone to jail for causing the near collapse of the economy,” he was also at a loss to say what specific criminal statute the execs might have broken.
Similarly at sea on foreign affairs, Sanders asserted that Israel had killed 10,000 civilian Palestinians in a 2014 military operation — more than five times the true number. Still more, he answered: “Actually I haven’t thought about it a whole lot,” when asked where a President Sanders would imprison or interrogate a captured ISIS terrorist.
Finally, Sanders’ ideological purity has found a boundary in political convenience. He roundly and repeatedly denounces corporate America for destroying the fabric of America, yet, representing a Second Amendment-friendly state, he voted to grant the gun industry near total immunity from lawsuits.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/vote-hillary-clinton-article-1.2598171
= new reply since forum marked as read
Sanders correctly knew the process would involve legislation, they diverted mistakenly to the Fed as if he could just direct the Fed to do it on its own. He rightly doubted this was possible. They, and your talking points crew, blew that up into a slander.
In any case, several hundred thousand people a day see the Daily News front page - which today was excoriating Clinton and De Blasio for their stupid skit ("SKIT FOR BRAINS"
. In 2016, several thousand might read and take seriously a Daily News editorial. And it's mostly your Clintonista talking points crew!
Without disclosing the same to the investment consumers, while SIMULTANEOUSLY making extremely profitable bets for themselves against the very same economic indicators dependent upon the craptastic house of cards they were peddling to "the little people"----
If those execs had done something truly egregious - like, say, smoke a joint in the privacy of their own home to ease some chemo nausea - then, you know, we could put them in prison, because unlike crashing the economy and raiding peoples retirement savings for fun and profit, smoking pot is a menace to the societal fabric AND AN ACTUAL CRIME.
And gosh darnit, the DNC is determined to keep it that way! 
