2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie may pick Elizabeth Warren for Vice-President or appoint her Treasury Secretary
If Warren is the Vice-President that would set her up to run for President in 2020.
She would become the first woman President of the United States and one progressive women and men could be proud of.
I'm not predicting but either move makes sense.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,023 posts)Or is that just your own speculation?
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)I like Warren or Turner for VP. It would be great for Bernie to pick a woman for VP. There's so many to choose from. I'm sure of one he would never choose.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)In TYT, the interview that they took one excerpt on and ran with both the Bernie is quitting, and Bernie is blackmailing story...well asked about HRC on the ticket and it was a no.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)That's about as likely as vice-versa.
And she won't be his secretary of state, either.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)I frankly did not want to see her on Obama's list after I realized she was pulling those subtle race tricks. When this one started I thought they could make a good ticket. I was still happy with how she performed in the hearings...but after the sexism and racist cards were played on me the 4th month in a row I am very happy that he said no. Nothing heals the nation faster than questioning the very core of a person's morality.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I don't think he'll ever get to the point where he's contemplating those sorts of choices.
Elizabeth Warren is on track to hold great sway in the Senate--and not just theoretical sway, actual power. Harry Reid set her up to have a lot of clout.
Hillary Clinton will be our first female POTUS.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)Well, she would be a heartbeat away from the presidency (with a somewhat aged president), and would have a leg up on being the next Democratic nominee... all without having gone through the whole grueling primary process. Maybe not a bad deal.
brooklynite
(94,592 posts)thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)There are plenty of quotes saying she is not running, and she didn't. I don't remember her ever saying that she had no interest in ever becoming president. Link?
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Warren is great for Treasury - or Fed chair!
JudyM
(29,251 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Veteran, some foreign policy chops, and has immediate experience at something that's really missing everywhere in these presidential campaigns: being young!
JudyM
(29,251 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Same is true of Warren and I think everyone else mentioned here. None of them have ever been in an executive function.
JudyM
(29,251 posts)... for someone a heartbeat away from the presidency.
I hope Bernie appoints her to his cabinet, though!! She's a rising star.
Ash20
(3 posts)3+ years as a US Rep,
3+ years as Vice-chair at DNC
2 years on Honolulu City Council, which is one of the most powerful City Councils in the country
3 years as a legislative aide to U.S. Senator Daniel Akaka
2 years as State House rep
JudyM
(29,251 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)She's come around recently, but her past position is not great.
reddread
(6,896 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... the Tooth Fairy for his VP, and Batman for Treasury Secretary. Being as he won't be the Dem nominee OR president, he can "pick" whoever he chooses for his never-gonna-happen administration.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Do people even think about these things?
First off, and just most basically, you don't put two New Englanders on a ticket if you're a Democrat (Republicans could conceivably, just like Democrats could put two southerners on).
Secondly, should he manage to win the nomination, it's going to be through getting establishment support in time for the convention, which means he'll also need some ideological breadth to the ticket, and not just the geographical breadth that is a given nowadays. So look for a moderate or conservative governor or senator from the west or midwest or south; somebody like McCaskill, Landrieu, or Sebelius.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)I seriously doubt that. His credibility rests largely on an idealogical consistency, a rep for avoiding doing things against his philosophies for purely political reasons. A cynical move like putting a moderate/conservative on the ticket completely undermines his message and the persona that has gotten him this far. Also, quite honestly, I think having someone just as liberal as his vp may provide a bit of extra "life insurance" shall we say.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)His viability in the general election depends on reaching past that group, and in particular in being seen reaching past that group.
thesquanderer
(11,989 posts)And even that is, I think, due in part to people's perception of him as authentic. If he messes that up, he loses one of his biggest strengths. So no, I'd double down... pick a VP who's pretty much in sync with him. Warren would be good. Sherrod Brown would be a possibility, even though he's endorsed Hillary.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)brooklynite
(94,592 posts)...first, she didn't want to be President, she DEFINITELY won't want to be VP.
...second, TWO northeastern liberals would make the Sanders base happy but be terrible as a national GE ticket
FSogol
(45,488 posts)"to pull numbers or facts from."