2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary just gave a disastrous interview to a Philly editorial board
http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/04/hillary-not-happy-when-asked-about-transcripts-to-wall-street-luncheon-speeches/Just listen to that clip, it's brutal.
apcalc
(4,465 posts)To the majority of Democratic voters.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)Is there some poll you are talking about?
demwing
(16,916 posts)apcalc supports Hillary and doesn't give a shit. Apparently, poster believes no one else does either.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Even a "meh" interview should be turned into a near-scandal. Let's see how she likes it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I thought only the GOP pushed fake scandals?
dogman
(6,073 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)JudyM
(29,251 posts)When Bernie releases his returns I'm sure Hillary will then release her speeches.
The question was very well-constructed, if a bit long.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Then she'll probably ask for his long for birth certificate and college transcripts. . . . .
JudyM
(29,251 posts)of the double standard.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Soooooo .... she's complaining about what, exactly?
salinsky
(1,065 posts)Why not surrender all pretense, don a tri-cornered hat, and start c&ping for the Gateway Pundit at this point.
Sheesh.
LisaM
(27,813 posts)I don't know if it's astroturf or clickbait.
dcbuckeye
(79 posts)Nothing new here. She was forceful but it certainly wasn't "disastrous." LOL
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)On Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:13 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Hillary just gave a disastrous interview to a Philly editorial board
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511721209
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Legal Insurrection is a notorious wingnut blog, made famous for throwing a temper tantrum that President Obama ordered Dijon mustard. No, really. http://legalinsurrection.com/2009/05/msnbc-hides-obamas-dijon-mustard-aka-dijongate/
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Apr 13, 2016, 11:22 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The alert could have been a response. Leave it alone.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Can we please, for the love of being liberal stop using wingnut sources here. If I wanted to read this shit I'd go to their sites. I took the time to look it up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_A._Jacobson https://twitter.com/leginsurrection https://www.facebook.com/legalinsurrection/ Stop using these sources. I'm hiding this.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Alerter is correct. Here is how they describe themselves: "Legal Insurrection now is one of the most widely cited and influential conservative websites, with hundreds of thousands of visitors per month. Our work has been highlighted by top conservative radio personalities, such as Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin, and Professor Jacobson regularly appears as a guest on radio shows across the nation."
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Right wing sources inappropriate
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Thin skinned alerter? where was any rudeness?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: While it may be true the source of the youtube is linked from a wingnut website, the reference is to an audio recording of HRC's own words.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Bravo.
Desert805
(392 posts)Did she say it or not?
Assuming you can admit she did (who knows lately), well... what gymnastics?
#6 was quite clear.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)bullshit is allowed to stand.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Hillary supporters are mad now because people are capturing Hillary's own words and posting them??
Who the hell cares what entity put the clip on youtube?
She said what she said.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Yep. Definitely right-wing. No doubt about it.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)back into the interwebs until the next opportunity to bash Democrats arises?
revbones
(3,660 posts)Can't admit she just readily lies - like being under sniper fire and running for cover? Or to unions? Or is corrupt?
She's only a Democrat because she has the "D" behind her name, definitely not by her actions.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)what I don't like is when people blatantly violate the TOS that they agreed to when they signed up by posting to RW garbage.
revbones
(3,660 posts)I'm tired of people whining about right-wing sources when it's their own candidate speaking. Or a video clip from CNN or MSNBC.
Response to revbones (Reply #38)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Always shows how Democratic they really are.
revbones
(3,660 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)First it was when every candidate, Republican or Democrat released their speech transcripts. Now she'll only release speech transcripts when Sanders releases all his tax returns, even though he released his latest already.
When Sanders releases his tax returns, it'll just be something else to delay with.
She is completely pathetic.
DookDook
(166 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Very revealing "Transparency" page. You must be proud of your "progressive" cred. LOL!
revbones
(3,660 posts)Regardless of source, it's an audio recording of Hillary. It's not like they doctored it up. Get over yourself.
factfinder_77
(841 posts)ok by be.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Ah, let's turn to conservatives to get our arguments.
http://legalinsurrection.com/about/
amborin
(16,631 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Kill the messenger because they have no answer to the message.
Desert805
(392 posts)Because I think it is.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)And now he is causing Hillary to say things on tape!!1!
Faux pas
(14,681 posts)bigtree
(85,998 posts)...when posting videos on behalf of your revolutionary candidate produced and distributed by openly conservative sources like 'legal insurrection.'
This is what the Sanders campaign has brought to DU, right-wing propaganda under the guise of progressiveness.
We can see you.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)It says, "Hillary Clinton interview with the Inquirer and Philadelphia Daily News Editorial Board"
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20160412_What_Hillary_Clinton_told_The_Inquirer.html
Maybe someone can start a fresh thread so as to avoid the association with the linked source in the OP?
This was audio of Sec Clinton. No spin, just Sec Clinton's own words.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)She does not like the questions.
jillan
(39,451 posts)that will be coming up in the GE.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Hillary Clinton interview with The Inquirer & Philadelphia Daily News Editorial Board
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511721590
frylock
(34,825 posts)Not ready for prime time.
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
The paper purchased to increase regional power and drive political goals.
The same empire that is preventing the Democratic voter records from being released to his son's challenger, Alex Law.
No sweat, she's got their endorsement.
.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)BWAHAHAHA. Hoisted on her own petard.
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts)TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)It's just a clip of Hillary responding to a question, so unless you are willing to claim it is doctored in some way, you have just done nothing but reveal your own inability to deal with truth.
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
That's the truth.
I've seen shit, from my poli-sci research, that would blow most minds.
This would be a time-waster compared the those.
Yet, at the same time, I am not revealing anything because I am not providing GOP opposition research.
You can shovel what you selling somewhere else.
.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)There will be time right then, before the vote, to release her speaking transcripts to Wall Street. Hillary played right into his hands...like putty.
First she wanted Bernie's speaking transcripts released. That was the fair bar for her. Oooopsie, he doesn't have any. So she's moved the post, and is asking for something she knows he has to give. She is stalling.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)I hope this gets a lot of coverage: her arrogance and disdain for average, working Americans and their desire to know the truth about how she has made her money and achieved her influence is remarkable. Bow down, peasants!
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Was she face to face or on a phone?
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Your true political allegiance is on display.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)they would have been released long ago. It makes no sense to take the grief and appearance of hiding something if there truly is nothing in them. Instead of defending not releasing them, she could be espousing her policy proposals.
Perhaps they are truly innocent. If that is the case, she is letting her feelings that it isn't fair cloud her judgment. That's not a good trait in a president.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Response to Csainvestor (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)She says she just talked about being Sec State and told the story of the Bin Laden raid etc etc, so why not just release the damn things and shut everyone up?
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Takes responsibility for nothing unless it makes her look good. She has the art of deceit down like a science. I fear for our country if she is elected. Seriously afraid.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)But the audio of it was even worse. Very contentious exchanges.