2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHRC Tells Tabloid NYDN: Honduras Coup Not Illegal
(unbelievable!)
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/04/13/hillary-clinton-says-honduras-coup-not-illegal-ny-daily-news-editorial-board
At a meeting with the New York Daily News editorial board on April 8, Clinton was asked about her direct involvement in the coup in Honduras, which took place when she was secretary of state.
interviewer to HRC:
As you know in 2009, the military overthrew President Zelaya. There was a period there where the OAS was trying to isolate that regime, but apparently some of the emails that have come out as a result of the State Department releases show that some of your top aides were urging you to declare it a military coup, cut off U.S. aid. You didnt do that. You ended up negotiating with Oscar Arias [former Costa Rican president] a deal for new elections.
But the situation in Honduras has continued to deteriorate. Theres been 300 people killed by government forces, and all these children fleeing and mothers from Honduras over the border into United States. And just a few weeks ago, one of the leading environmental activist, Berta Cáceres, was assassinated in her home. Do you have any concerns about the role that you played in that particular situation, even not necessarily being in agreement with your top aides in the State Department?
Clinton responded, The legislature, the national legislature in Honduras and the national judiciary actually followed the law in removing President Zelaya.
snip
The U.S. embassy in Honduras rejected all of the coup defenders rationalizations for a patently illegal act and outlined the following: the military had no authority to remove Zelaya from the
country;
Congress has no constitutional authority to remove a Honduran president; Congress and the judiciary removed Zelaya on the basis of a hasty, ad-hoc, extralegal, secret, 48-hour process; and Zelayas arrest and forced removal from the country violated multiple constitutional guarantees, including the prohibition on expatriation, presumption of innocence and right to due process.
How can anyone claiming to have sound judgment read such a clear-cut assessment and still assert there was a strong argument the constitution and rule of law was followed in Honduras?
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)At least Tricky Dick was more liberal than her on several issues.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Hill and Bill seem to think they create their own reality...hmmm...
where have we heard that before
factfinder_77
(841 posts)Clinton: Well, let me again try to put this in context. The legislature, the national legislature in Honduras and the national judiciary actually followed the law in removing President Zelaya. Now I didn't like the way it looked or the way they did it but they had a very strong argument that they had followed the constitution and the legal precedence. And as you know, they really undercut their argument by spiriting him out of the country in his pajamas, where they sent the military to take him out of his bed and get him out of the country. So this began as a very mixed and difficult situation.
If the United States government declares a coup, you immediately have to shut off all aid including humanitarian aid, the Agency for International Development aid, the support that we were providing at that time for a lot of very poor people, and that triggers a legal necessity. There's no way to get around it. So our assessment was, we will just make the situation worse by punishing the Honduran people if we declare a coup and we immediately have to stop all aid for the people, but we should slow walk and try to stop anything that the government could take advantage of without calling it a coup.
So you're right. I worked very hard with leaders in the region and got Oscar Arias, the Nobel Prize winner, to take the lead on trying to broker a resolution. Without bloodshed. And that was very important to us that
Zelaya had friends and allies not just in Honduras but in some of the neighboring countries like Nicaragua, and that we could have had a terrible civil war that would have been just terrifying in its loss of life.
So I think we came out with a solution that did hold new elections, but it did not in any way address the structural, systemic problems in that society. And I share your concern that it's not just government actions. Drug gangs, traffickers of all kinds are preying on the people of Honduras.
So I think we need to do more of a Colombian plan for Central America, because remember what was going in Colombia when first my husband and then followed by President Bush had Plan Colombia, which was to try to use our leverage to rein in the government in their actions against the FARC and the guerillas, but also to help the government stop the advance of the FARC and guerillas.
And now we're in the middle of peace talks. It didn't happen overnight. It took a number of years, but I want to see a much more comprehensive approach towards Central America because it's just Honduras. The highest murder rate is in El Salvador and we've got Guatemala with all the problems you know so well.
So I think in retrospect we managed a very difficult situation without bloodshed, without a civil war that led to a new election, and I think that was better for the Honduran people, but we have a lot of work to do to try to help stabilize that and deal with corruption, deal with violence and the gangs and so much else
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)islandmkl
(5,275 posts)trying to score hard to make up for lost time...
JudyM
(29,251 posts)RandySF
(58,911 posts)While some use the Post on occasion to trash Hillary.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)Not much substance.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)The history from 2009:
Hillary Clintons Honduran Disgrace
By Matthew Rothschild
The Progressive, March 5, 2010
Hillary Clinton continues with her hawkish ways, making Obamas foreign policy less distinguishable from Bushs every day.
She just met with Honduran President Pepe Lobo, shes notified Congress that the Obama administration is restoring aid to Honduras, and shes urging Latin American nations to recognize the Lobo government in Tegucigalpa.
The democratic opposition in Honduras boycotted lobos election, since hes allied with the forces that overthrew Manuel Zelaya last June.
But for the longest time, Hillary Clinton stubbornly refused to call the June takeover a coup, even though her boss, the president of the United States, immediately denounced it as such.
SNIP..
Other countries of the region say that they want to wait a while, she said on her Latin American trip. I dont know what theyre waiting for.
CONTINUED...
http://progressive.org/wx030510.html
Originally, President Obama backed ousted Honduran president (supporters shown in civilian clothes below).
Dancing with Monsters: The U.S. Response to the 2009 Honduran Coup
"A coup anywhere in Latin America is a very big deal.
By Alvaro Valle
Harvard Political Review, April 13, 2015
SNIP...
The U.S. Response
Latin American governments immediately denounced Zelayas ouster as a military coup. The United States was not quite as decisive in its diction, with the initial statement from the Obama administration merely calling on all political and social actors in Honduras to respect democratic norms. Obama did go on to denounce the coup in the following days, but Frank noted that Obamas characterization of the government change was very important. He very clearly failed to call it a military coup. If he had called it a military coup, the United States would have had to immediately suspend all police and military aid, Frank explained. Eventually some money sent was suspended, but the vast majority was not.
Following the coup, President Obama called many times for the reinstatement of Zelaya. In contrast, Secretary of State Clinton made remarks that were far more equivocal. When asked if the United States had any plans to alter aid to the coup government, , Much of our assistance is conditioned on the integrity of the democratic system. But if we were able to get to a status quo that returned to the rule of law and constitutional order within a relatively short period of time, I think that would be a good outcome. Clinton seemed to prioritize having a stable regime over preserving democratic ideals.
As further evidence, Clinton wrote in her book, Hard Choices, In the subsequent days [after the coup] we strategized on a plan to restore order in Honduras and ensure that free and fair elections could be held quickly and legitimately, which would render the question of Zelaya moot, revealing that even as the administration publicly advocated for Zelayas return, Clinton was not working to ensure that it would happen.
Pastor added that Clinton had personal connections with supporters of the coup government that may have led her to soften her stance. For instance, Lanny Davis, Bill Clintons former personal lawyer and a longtime Hillary Clinton supporter, lobbied in Washington for the Honduran coup government, Honduran elites, the Business Council of Latin America, and the American companies that took issue with Zelayas reforms. Bennett Ratcliff, another top Democratic campaigner with close ties to the Clintons, also worked for the Honduran coup government as a lobbyist in Washington. These personal connections to advocates for the coup government raise troubling concerns that political ties influenced Clintons stance.
In Clintons defense, these personal connections were not the only political forces supporting the coup. Levitsky noted that initial opposition to the coup in the United States may have given way because Republicans held a couple of major U.S.-Latin America appointments: the Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs and the Ambassador to Brazil. They held these positions hostage to a softening of U.S. policy toward the coup government.
CONTINUED w/ links sources etc....
http://harvardpolitics.com/united-states/us-honduran-coup/
If you believe in Democracy, you think others deserve it, too -- NOT just the rich and white.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)(No, I did not call it a career of evil
factfinder_77
(841 posts)its in the details
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)that can then define the 'details'....
the events themselves do not change one iota just because of some arbitrary 'definition'...
kind of like deciding whether, should i, for some reason, hit you over the head with a baseball bat...that it was 'battery' or 'admonishment'...
DetroitSocialist83
(169 posts)I have always voted straight Dem my whole life, but I just don't know if I can bring myself to support her.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)At least five children have died in Honduras after being deported back to Honduras.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/minors-honduras-killed_n_5694986.html
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)Does she have any idea how destructive that was and how much it is hated in Latin America?
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)must be good for Wall Street...
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)known by State since 2004 as the kingpin who'd wrestled the cocaine routes from the Haitians and she backed the coup they'd engineered and ended real democracy--did she think there'd be a DOWNSIDE?!
Lone_Wolf
(1,603 posts)Perhaps she is lying about being a lawyer too?
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Dog knows she says it often enough.