2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo emily's list is not endorsing a liberal Latina
Last edited Wed Apr 13, 2016, 04:27 PM - Edit history (1)
wow just wow, got an email from the Sanders campaign on this asking to split donations between Sanders and Flores
edited to take out never should of put incumbent in post
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)What exactly is your problem with their endorsement of Susie Lee?
EMILYs List Endorses Susie Lee for Congress in Nevadas Fourth Congressional District
WASHINGTON, D.C. Today EMILYs List, the nations largest resource for women in politics, endorsed Susie Lee, whos running to represent Nevadas Fourth Congressional District and continue her lifelong fight for women and families.
Susie Lee is an experienced problem solver and a powerful advocate for Nevada women and families, said Stephanie Schriock, president of EMILY's List. As one of eight children raised in a working-class family, Susie knows that hardworking people all too often struggle to make ends meet. She is deeply committed to serving the most vulnerable Nevadans because she saw firsthand that community support can help disadvantaged children overcome barriers to opportunity. The stakes are high for women and families in this swing district, and the EMILYs List community of over three million members is excited to endorse Susies strong campaign to move Nevada forward.
Susie Lee grew up one of eight children in a working class family that often struggled to make ends meet on her veteran fathers single income. She worked several jobs, took out loans, and earned scholarships to pay her way through college and graduate school. Susie counted on her teachers, coaches, and other mentors in her community who believed in her and gave her the support she needed to achieve her academic goals, and she is deeply committed to connecting children with the resources they need to have a fair shot. After making Las Vegas her home over twenty years ago, she quickly set out to make a difference in the lives of women and families in her community. Susie served as a campaign policy advisor to the first woman elected mayor in Las Vegas history, Jan Laverty Jones, and was the founding executive director of a crisis intervention program serving women and families experiencing homelessness. She served as founding director of the After-School All-Stars, an organization that provides thousands of Nevada children with afterschool activities and enrichment programs. Today Susie leads Communities In Schools of Nevada as president of the board, working tirelessly to increase the high school graduation rate by connecting at-risk youth with the personal support and resources they need to succeed. She lives in Las Vegas with her husband Dan and two children Cody and Nevada, and from leading her daughters Girl Scout troop to advocating for tens of thousands of Nevada students, she is unwavering in her commitment to service. When elected to Congress, Susie will fight to increase educational and economic opportunities for all of Nevadas working families.
When Susie was growing up, she learned firsthand what it's like for a family to live paycheck to paycheck and she understands that Nevadas working families need their elected leaders to help get our economy working for all of us. When elected, she will advocate for policies that will grow the middle class and increase opportunities for women and families to get ahead. Susie understands that families and communities are stronger when women succeed in the workplace, and when elected she will fight for policies aimed at ending gender discrimination in pay, implementing paid family and medical leave, and increasing the minimum wage. Susie knows from personal experience that teachers and mentors can help disadvantaged children overcome barriers to opportunity. Under her leadership, Communities in Schools of Nevada serves 58,000 students in 56 schools, ensuring there are caring adults providing personal support to children who are at risk of dropping out. We all have a responsibility to help our young people have the highest level of opportunities, she has said. In the last school year, students in the program graduated on time at a rate 25 percentage points above the Nevada state average. When elected she will work tirelessly to move Nevada forward for all children and families.
http://www.emilyslist.org/news/entry/emilys-list-endorses-susie-lee-for-congress-in-nevadas-fourth-congressional
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)#IDidMyResearch.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)What is your problem with Susie Lee?
This research tells a lot more than what you are bringing to the table.
http://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=790611
When all one dreams about is Sanders, Sanders then rules every aspect of ones worldview.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)And then did not endorse a Latina when the option was available. One they had endorsed in the past and one who was the first Latina successful in getting elected to the State Assembly.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Because they are a kick ass organization.
"And then did not endorse a Latina when the option was available."
That is actually an easily disprovable statement by you. Even with respect to Flores herself. At least try.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)It is fact they did not endorse Lucy Flores for her Congress bid for 2016 which is the year that this Latina initiative is for.
Susie Lee is a white woman so it doesn't make sense why they endorsed her over Lucy Flores.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)then took it away.
senz
(11,945 posts)It seems like everything a certain person touches becomes corrupted. She has a strange kind of "Midas touch" -- for corruption.
Makes me sick.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)gabeana
(3,166 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)gabeana
(3,166 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)Perhaps they where not that impressed with her campaigning.
gabeana
(3,166 posts)then your not being serious
it is because she endorsed Sanders, not on the ability of Flores
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Tell me, what is your problem with Susie Lee?
gabeana
(3,166 posts)but when they write a paper saying they want to support more Latinas, and there is a Latina running for office, has been elected to office, ran for state wide office before, and then Emily list endorses a white women over a women of color
I think it is clear why they did it
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)gabeana
(3,166 posts)back it up why it is stupid
gabeana
(3,166 posts)come up with anything yet
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Amazing what passes for discussion here. More like deflection and deception.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)It is embarrassing how you denigrate her accomplishments to fit your argument framing.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)That is the second time you have been dishonest in this short conversation.
Please show where I denigrated her accomplishment.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)as a rationalization that she is a bad candidate therefore EMILY's list was right in not endorsing her. But the fact she is the FIRST Latina in history of Nevada to be elected to the State Assembly says otherwise.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)You can't because it is a lie.
At the same time, you directly denigrated Susie Lee by claiming she didn't deserve the endorsement because she is white. That is directly from you. Along with the fact you think it has something to do with Sanders. Once again, that is denigrating Susie Lee.
You cannot back up your falsehood in any way.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Here is an article about the anger the EMILY's list betrayal caused
http://www.latinorebels.com/2016/03/11/emilys-list-slammed-on-facebook-for-not-endorsing-latina-lucy-flores-for-congress/
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Please back up your claim that I denigrated Flores. Thanks.
"Susie Lee is a white woman so it doesn't make sense why they endorsed her over Lucy Flores." - GeorgiaPeanuts
My comment was spot on and I did not imply you were racist.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I said losing areas in your own district by sixty points might have something to do with it.
Please back up your claim that I denigrated Flores. Thanks.
Flores and Lee are both people worthy of endorsement. You have made multiple wild false accusations.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)This is her 2nd attempt at the Presidency, she already failed in 2008 so why do you think it is cogent that they endorsed her when she was the loser in 2008?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Some of those lies you have now stated multiple times. You know you can't back them up in any way so you just try to move along. Really poor debating style and not worth my time.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)I knew Kerry was too good of a candidate to lose in 2004. It was Edwards who lost that race!
gabeana
(3,166 posts)you are implying because she did so bad in her statewide match up she should not be endorsed
White Americans are represented 80% on congress
Latina/o only 7.8%
Their needs to be a lot more representation of women in Congress and even more so for Women of Color
so when say your organization is going to make a concerted effort for Latina's to hold elected office, and their is a candidate that has already broke through, has experience, and then you support the white women candidate after the Latina just happens to endorse Sanders, it is not too hard to figure out why Emily's list did this
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)A lot of their efforts, like this one, fall flat once the details catch up to the sensationalism.
I think they really exposed themselves as frauds with the whole "super-predator" thing, and now they're the proverbial "boy who cried wolf" on this subject. (Bro who cried wolf?) No one believes the phony outrage any more, because it's clearly insincere.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It's comical that this person is trying to claim I have denigrated Flores. I have done no such thing. I like Flores and Lee.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Isn't even from that district.
Beowulf
(761 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)by Emily's List. She is now running for Congress, again endorsed by Emily's List.
Until she endorsed Bernie.
Here's a link so you can download google. https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/95346?hl=en
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)LisaM
(27,813 posts)Not just any office!
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)MadBadger
(24,089 posts)Do you have the link to install the google specifically?
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)(Remember Encarta??!)
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Flores ran for Lt Gov in 2014, and did not win.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)offense to and shoot off an Alert over these days. If I'd said "she lost" my comment would probably already be hidden.
senz
(11,945 posts)It's been awful watching former "liberal icons" bite the dust one by one for Hillary. Planned Parenthood, the Democratic Party, Black Congressional Caucus ("leadership," not membership), Emily's List.
Corruption really is like a worm or like rust -- it eats into things, changes their character, ruins them.
But it makes me all the prouder of Elizabeth Warren for being the only Senate Democratic woman to resist the siren call of a Hillary endorsement and of the always brave Alan Grayson and Tulsi Gabbard.
I cannot even begin to imagine what a Hillary presidency would do to what's left of our country.
LisaM
(27,813 posts)You might want to fix the headline of the OP.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)LisaM
(27,813 posts)EMILY's List has done an awful lot of good since the 1990s raising money for women candidates. Of course their mission is to endorse pro-choice women Democrats, but given a choice of candidates, they're likely to choose the one they think is more viable.
And I'm really, really sick of misleading headlines. I guess it's the effect of social media, online journalism, and creating clickbait, but still.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
JI7
(89,251 posts)dragonfly301
(399 posts)but they really are endorsing just because a candidate is a woman and is pro-choice. I am a woman, but I have many issues - in my district I see that Emily's List has endorsed Kathleen Matthews (Mrs. Tweetybird) she is far less progressive than Jamie Raskin so the Emily's List endorsement means very little to me. None of the candidates running for the seat are against choice and I don't need Emily's List to point out to me which one has a uterus.
The question I have for Emily's List - do they offer their endorsement to any female, pro-choice candidate that has not endorsed Clinton? I ask because Donna Edwards has rec'd their endorsement and a big chunk of change and has endorsed Hillary although her political ideology is much more aligned with Bernie. I found her endorsement odd and questioned her on fb - she did not respond but did "like" my comment.