2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVox: Most Bernie Sanders supporters aren't willing to pay for his revolution
This is an interesting article http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/4/14/11421744/bernie-sanders-tax-revolution
But in order to pay for his proposed programs, Sanders needs to increase taxes on virtually everyone in America. So if you're a voter, the question is simple:
Are you willing to pay more taxes for his proposals, like nationalized health care and free public college tuition?
How much more?
When we polled voters, we found most Sanders supporters aren't willing to pay more than an additional $1,000 in taxes for his biggest proposals. That's well short of how much more the average taxpayer would pay under his tax plan.
We asked voters how much more they are willing to pay for nationalized health care and free public college
We conducted a poll the week of April 4 in partnership with the nonpartisan technology and media company Morning Consult. In it, we asked voters how much more they would be willing to pay for two of Sanders's big propositions: a universal health care system covering all Americans and free tuition at public colleges and universities.
Most Americans say they are willing to pay something extra for these programs:
Nationalized health care: Around 80 percent of Sanders supporters are willing to pay more in federal taxes for universal health care coverage, compared with about 70 percent of Clinton supporters and about 40 percent of those supporting a Republican candidate.
Free public college tuition: A slightly lower percentage of people were willing to pay more for free public college tuition: 80 percent of Sanders supporters, 60 percent of Clinton supporters, and about 40 percent of those supporting a Republican candidate.
But when we look at how much more voters are willing to pay, we get a better idea of how voters view Sanders's plan.
Two in three Sanders supporters don't want to pay more than $1,000, or at all, for universal health care
About 66 percent of Sanders supporters said they wouldn't be willing to pay more than an additional $1,000 in taxes for universal health care. This includes the 8 percent of Sanders supporters who aren't willing to pay anything at all.
Sanders platform is not being supported by Sandes own supporters.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Gothmog
(156,305 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)More or less than for education?
It seems odd to me that education is suddenly where folks want to draw the line.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)yodermon
(6,147 posts)Did the poll question indicate that health care premiums would be eliminated?
eShirl
(18,906 posts)IamMab
(1,359 posts)Do as they say, not as they do, clearly.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Of course people don't want to pay more taxes, regardless of what benefits they might get in return. That's natural.
Those numbers would be even worse if Bernie was honest, and said that his college plan would not only require a tax on "Wall Street" (really anyone who has an investment), but also big tax increases at the state level to fund the portion of the plan he never talks about.
senz
(11,945 posts)He's had it up on his website for many months. He does his own work and doesn't pay progressives to write up his issues, like his opponent. He actually works it out for himself.
NOW READ: https://berniesanders.com/issues/how-bernie-pays-for-his-proposals/
Gothmog
(156,305 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Aww, too bad.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)He won 1 state.
senz
(11,945 posts)Gothmog
(156,305 posts)Sanders plan to raise taxes would kill down ballot candidates http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/27/politics/nancy-pelosi-bernie-sanders-taxes/
Speaking at the House Democratic Caucus' annual retreat here, Pelosi sidestepped a question about the growing concerns of fellow Democrats over the impact Sanders could have on 2016 House and Senate races, saying, "I'm very proud of all three of our candidates."
But the top House Democrat didn't mince words when it came to Vermont Senator Sanders' health care proposal, dismissing the notion of a single-payer health care plan, curtly saying, "That's not going to happen."
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:57 PM - Edit history (1)
Last night we had one candidate using right-wing talking points ("free stuff" and today we have DUers arguing against raising taxes on the rich.
No wonder so many are leaving the party.
Gothmog
(156,305 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Gothmog
(156,305 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Gothmog
(156,305 posts)I voted for Mondale but it was sad to see that defeat.
Maybe you should talk to Nancy Pelosi. She is clear that congressional candidates will avoid Sanders' sad platform because it would kill them in congressional races.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Nice to see you applauding Congressional obstruction.
Gothmog
(156,305 posts)Raising taxes is a bad party platform which is why Congressional democrats will be avoiding this stupidity
frylock
(34,825 posts)A fantasy land where trickle-down economics has proven to be a failure to all but a percentage of very wealthy individuals. A world of fantasy where our most prosperous years were during a time when a Republican was President, and the marginal tax rate was around 90%.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Maybe they're broke because they can't find work to repay their college loans.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Poll found that many or most are willing to pay a little more. Not coincidentally, most taxpayers will see their rates drop, with some high-income households having to pay a little more and the richest paying significantly more.
It's called progressive taxation, and it's why right-wing talking points are arrayed against it.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)No way in hell they interviewed real Sanders supporters and came up with those percentages, unless the questions were manipulated and didn't factor in the cost savings. There's a reason why we're Bernie supporters in the first place. Pure propaganda piece and not worth the time it took to read it.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)... propagating the GOP/HRC meme that no value is delivered in exchange for any social insurance tax.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)First of all this crappy poll is asking registered voters if they support Sander's tax initiatives, not Sanders supporters directly. For example:
As you may know, presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has proposed federal tax increases to pay for his proposed government programs.
How much more would you be willing to pay in federal taxes each year for each of the following programs?
A universal healthcare system that covers all Americans
59% of registered voters would pay something for these programs vs. 30% who wouldn't pay anything.
No where on that report does it say Sanders supporters or Clinton supporters. I'd rather look at raw data than read spin.
amborin
(16,631 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)they don't want it apparently.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Considering that privatized health insurance costs 15-20% more (in the form of profits and executive salaries) than the public equivqalent would, I'd be more than happy to pay the same to the government as I'm paying to a private insurer; I would demand a 15-20% improvement in benefits to go along with it.
Same for education. I would prefer that the young people who keep the economy running after I retire (if I can ever retire) know what they are doing and run it productively. That's worth some money.
One more thing: there is a ton of money tied up in the parasite class (the banksters, oil slimers, and pharma drug pushers). It's time to stop the upward transfer of wealth and start investing OUR money in a better society.
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)He educated them and we will live with it until young people continue Bernie's revolution for their share. Unfortunately we won't know what that might look like. The elderly may be their target eventually because they have no institutional memory of when our country worked for everyone.
Our troubles are not over. Bernie has the memory and intelligence and support of the young to make real change that is fair and just for all of us. With his loss, so goes the leader that can get it done and keep the young on an even path that benefits all of us. Without him who knows what will happen.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Go, Hillary! We love you!
Joob
(1,065 posts)ibegurpard
(16,889 posts)That does not take into account eliminating deductibles and out of pockets.