Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JaneQPublic

(7,113 posts)
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 01:43 AM Mar 2012

ABC News 10 years ago: "Erections Get Insurance; Why Not the Pill?"

I surfed onto the following article, and was surprised that it was written almost 10 years ago:

Within weeks of hitting the U.S. market in 1998, more than half of Viagra prescriptions received health insurance coverage. If many women weren't already outraged that they had to pay for birth control out of pocket, they were infuriated at the preference given to the anti-impotence pills.

...

This week, New York became the 20th state to require that insurers and employers provide contraceptive coverage. That means that half of U.S. women now live in states requiring at least some birth control coverage, according to Planned Parenthood. Massachusetts and Arizona passed similar bills earlier this year that will go into effect in 2003.

MORE...
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91538


Considering Rush's earlier legal problems with Viagra (http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-1753947.html), his vile remarks about contraception coverage certainly raise the question of boner-pill coverage for men. Any surprise he's not equally outraged by insurance for erections?
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ABC News 10 years ago: "Erections Get Insurance; Why Not the Pill?" (Original Post) JaneQPublic Mar 2012 OP
Isn't that interesting? So insurance should cover him with is doctor shopping so he can receive IndyJones Mar 2012 #1
You would THINK Cosmocat Mar 2012 #2
It was a legitimate complaint ten years ago. It's not anymore. bornskeptic Mar 2012 #3
Interesting. Have any links, or did you just pull those details out of your JaneQPublic Mar 2012 #4

IndyJones

(1,068 posts)
1. Isn't that interesting? So insurance should cover him with is doctor shopping so he can receive
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 04:28 AM
Mar 2012

all kinds of different pain pills AND viagra issued in someone else's name, but birth control....oh, that's horrific! So is Rush a slut for taking viagra?

Cosmocat

(14,566 posts)
2. You would THINK
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 09:37 AM
Mar 2012

that what these people SAY their objections are, that all of this moral/fiscal outrage would be over Viagra, not the pill.

The "liberal media" has been interjecting this all along, right?

bornskeptic

(1,330 posts)
3. It was a legitimate complaint ten years ago. It's not anymore.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 12:52 PM
Mar 2012

Since then most insurance plans have changed to include birth control and still only about half cover viagra. Medicare covered viagra briefly after the prescription drug benefit was instituted, but dropped it shortly afterwards, and that dispute was in the news also.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»ABC News 10 years ago: &q...