2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"As Commander in Chief, I have a deeply held preference for peace over war." Barack Obama 3/4/12 nt
judy
(1,942 posts)So fight for your deeply held preference, as if the world depended on it...stop the drone attacks, renditions, Guantanamo, etc. GO FOR IT!!!
vaberella
(24,634 posts)The Democratic run Congress and Senate at the time. The Republicans won't even hear him say "Gua..." before they shut him down.
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)dmoyer
(114 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)lumpy
(13,704 posts)is committed to taking the circumstances of conflict under consideration. Like most of us he would use retalitory force if we are attacked. We should be thankful that he is a leader who believes in using peaceful means to tackle conflicts.
rug
(82,333 posts)Sorry, his record on war is abyssmal.
Now, I really don't want him to explain why military action against Iran is necessary.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)There have been a few that would trump him. Eisenhower is probably the most recent to come to mind, although Kennedy was pissed when he came into office. Ike had spent time proclaiming "he kept us out of war" only to be told of all the places around the world that Kennedy might have to take military action, including Cuba and Vietnam. Carter was pretty "peaceful" in his 4 years. But yeah, considering the exteremly long list of conflicts in which this country has been involved since its inception, there aren't alot of pacificist periods to which to point. But even among this list, Obama has had sustained, increased, or started an incredible number of actions for a guy that ran in the primaries trying to appeal to the anti-war crowd.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,235 posts)JNathanK
(185 posts)babylonsister
(171,070 posts)And is that going to be Joe Wilson, or some other unknown Wilson?
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)1916 and Woodrow I'm sure is what he meant.