2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFlorida early vote totals revised, raising questions - (The Grio)
* See chart at link
http://thegrio.com/2012/10/29/florida-early-vote-totals-revised-raising-questions/
In Florida, counting votes has been controversial for some time; particularly since the 2000 election. And with early voting underway as of Saturday, there are already questions being raised about the vote count in Broward County.
Broward is a Democratic stronghold that Barack Obama is expected to carry by a large margin. But initial early vote totals reported by the office of the Broward Supervisor of Elections changed on Sunday, in some cases dramatically, causing some to question the numbers.
An analysis of the unofficial totals by early voting location on the Broward Supervisor of Elections website from Saturday, compared to the tallies posted on Sunday, shows that in one location, the E. Pat Larkins Community Center, located on Martin Luther King Blvd. in Pompano Beach, the revised totals showed 1,003 fewer votes. The initial tally reported from the polling place in the heavily black neighborhood showed 2,945 votes, but the revised tally was 1,401. Across the 17 Broward polling locations, 15 saw their vote totals revised, mostly by minute amounts of between 1 and 7 votes. But the three more significant changes, including the addition of 398 votes in Tamarac (a racially mixed community) and adding 99 votes to the totals from Pompano Beach City Hall, whose demographic is majority white.
The revisions mean that 536 fewer total votes were reported in Broward a reduction from 28,330 votes to 27,794 votes. That could be significant in a close election in a state where the presidential contest was decided by just 538 votes in 200 MORE AT LINK
1monster
(11,012 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Can anyone trust the Florida elections system!?
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Does anyone know the right channels?
Follow the Grio here - I hope that Joy Reid reports on this on the Ed Show
https://twitter.com/thegrio
@thegrio
Joy Reid twitter account:
https://twitter.com/TheReidReport
ffr
(22,670 posts)Called them and they corrected. Republicans were under-recorded the most, so they picked up a disproportionate 366 votes (D - 651, R - 1017), whereas the voter turnout favors Democrats by 10 points. I have to reconcile their two PDF reports, b/c there are still 281 votes I cannot accounted for (missing).
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Is this unusual? Ouch.
doublethink
(6,823 posts)Are you serious? Would like to hear more on this please.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)on the elections? If not I'm going to make some calls too! Woo hoo.
ffr
(22,670 posts)Actually, nobody else on the planet caught it, but me. GMU.EDU is using the NV SoS revised PDF numbers.
I will attempt to reconcile their two PDFs later, the one from 11:00AM and the second from 12:00PM (after my call). I have to work at least some of today .
If anyone would like to take the numbers as I have posted them & reposted them again within the same thread (DU post link here) you should come up with the same numbers as I did. The error occurred today, reflecting post 10/27/12 votes and had not been out of balance prior to this morning. The NV SoS phone number is 775-684-5708 (Carson City, NV), option #7.
Use these numbers from the 11:00AM 10/29/12 PDF:
Dems - 194914
Reps - 159141
Others - 76619
Total shown- 433029 <== does not equal, off by 2,355
ffr
(22,670 posts)The number was plugged, whereas the detail, which did not change, was correct.
They had two reports this morning for Week 2 EV results which began on Saturday. Here are the numbers as they posted them per their time stamps:
10:00AM
Dems - 4,923
Reps - 4,352
Others 2,334
Total = 13,964 <== 2,355 over-reported
Revised
11:30AM
Dems - 4,923
Reps - 4,352
Others 2,334
Total = 11,609 <== Correct formula total
Took me an hour to determine exactly where this formula/data entry error was, but I found it.
So the only question remaining, if there is one, is where did the 13,964 number come from? Was it a plugged number, was it human error or are there numbers to substantiate it? Seems like case closed IMO.
doublethink
(6,823 posts)was used a lot in the 2004 election Kerry vs Bush. The 'glitches' were about 98% in the Republican favor and they stayed that way. I hate that word glitch to this day.
-LOKI -BAD FOR YA
(308 posts)MuttLikeMe
(279 posts)she's on his show all the time